Advertisement

Literature Review and Framework

  • Ji Yeong IEmail author
  • Hyewon Chang
  • Ji-Won Son
Chapter
Part of the Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective book series (MATHEDUCASPER)

Abstract

This chapter explains the conceptual framework, research-based strategies for teaching mathematics, and how we situated existing theories in the context of teaching KLLs. Particularly, we frame this study within a modified Culturally Responsive Mathematics Teaching tool, which was developed as a teacher self-analysis tool by Aguirre and del Rosario Zavala (Pedagogies Int J 8:163–190, 2013). This chapter also describes the conceptual framework in detail with specific examples.

Keywords

Culturally responsive mathematics teaching Research-based teaching strategies 

References

  1. Aguirre, J. M., & del Rosario Zavala, M. (2013). Making culturally responsive mathematics teaching explicit: A lesson analysis tool. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 8(2), 163–190.Google Scholar
  2. Aguirre, J. M., Zavala, M. D. R., & Katanyoutanant, T. (2012). Developing robust forms of pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through culturally responsive mathematics teaching analysis. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 14(2), 113–136.Google Scholar
  3. Ahn, R., Catbagan, P., Tamayo, K., I, J. Y., Lopez, M., & Walker, P. (2015). Successful minority pedagogy in mathematics: US and Japanese case studies. Teachers and Teaching, 21(1), 87–102.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.928125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. American Educational Research Association. (2006). Do the math: Cognitive demand makes a difference. Research Points, 4(2).Google Scholar
  5. Anstrom, K. (1997). Academic achievement for secondary language minority students: Standards, measures, and promising practices. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education. http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/pubs/reports/acadach.htm.
  6. Barwell, R. (2003). Patterns of attention in the interaction of a primary school mathematics student with English as an additional language. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53(1), 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brenner, M. E. (1998). Development of mathematical communication in problem solving groups by language minority students. Bilingual Research Journal, 22(2–4), 103–128.Google Scholar
  8. Celedon-Pattichis, S., & Ramirez, N. G. (Eds.). (2012). Beyond good teaching: Advancing mathematics education for ELLs. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  9. Center for Mathematics Education of Latinos/as (CEMELA). (2006). Mathematics classroom observation protocol. Tucson: University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  10. Chval, K. B., & Chávez, Ó. (2011). Designing math lessons for English language learners. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 17(5), 261–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chval, K. B., & Khisty, L. L. (2009). Latino students, writing, and mathematics: A case study of successful teaching and learning. In R. Barwell (Ed.), Multilingualism in mathematics classrooms: Global perspectives (pp. 128–144). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Civil, M. (2002). Culture and mathematics: A community approach. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 23(2), 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Civil, M. (2007). Building on community knowledge: An avenue to equity in mathematics education. In N. Nasir & P. Cobb (Eds.), Improving access to mathematics: Diversity and equity in the classroom (pp. 105–117). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Civil, M. (2016). STEM learning research through a funds of knowledge lens. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 41–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9648-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Araujo, Z. (2012). Transferring demand: Secondary teachers’ selection and enactment of mathematics tasks for English language learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Athens, GA: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  16. Echevarria, J., Vogt, M., & Short, D. (2010). The SIOP model for teaching mathematics to English learners. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  17. Gandara, P. C., & Contreras, F. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Garcia, O., Kleifgen, J. A., & Falchi, L. (2008). From English language learners to emergent bilinguals. Equity matters. Research review no. 1. Campaign for Educational Equity, Teachers College, Columbia University. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED524002.
  19. Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gay, G. (2002). Preparing for culturally responsive teaching. Journal of teacher education, 53(2), 106–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Gee, J. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Grossman, P., Schoenfeld, A., & Lee, C. (2005). Teaching subject matter. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world (pp. 201–231). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  25. Gutiérrez, R. (2009). Embracing the inherent tensions in teaching mathematics from an equity stance. Democracy and Education, 18(3), 9–16.Google Scholar
  26. Gutiérrez, R. (2010). The sociopolitical turn in mathematics education. [Editorial, special equity issue]. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education. http://www.nctm.org/uploadedFiles/Journals_and_Books/JRME/articles/JRME_Special_EquityIssue/jrme2010-08-5a.pdf.
  27. Hansson, Å. (2012). The meaning of mathematics instruction in multilingual classrooms: Analyzing the importance of responsibility for learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(1), 103–125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-012-9385-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. I, Y. J., & Chang, H. (2014). Teaching mathematics for Korean language learners based on ELL education models. ZDM, 46(6), 939–951.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0631-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jang, Y. Y., & Choi-Koh, S. S. (2009). A case study on the instructional dimensions in teaching mathematics to the elementary school students from multi-cultural backgrounds. Journal of Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series A: The Mathematical Education., 48(4), 419–442.Google Scholar
  30. Khisty, L. L., & Chval, K. (2002). Pedagogic discourse and equity in mathematics: When teachers’ talk matters. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(3), 154–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kitchen, R. S. (2005). Making equity and multiculturalism explicit to transform mathematics education. In A. J. Rodriguez & R. S. Kitchen (Eds.), Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy (pp. 33–60). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. Kitchen, R. S., DePree, J., Celedón-Pattichis, S., & Brinkerhoff, J. (2007). Mathematics education at highly effective schools that serve the poor: Strategies for change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  33. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  35. Lim, C. S., & Presmeg, N. (2011). Teaching mathematics in two languages: A teaching dilemma of Malaysia Chinese primary schools. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 137–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moll, L. (1988). Key issues in teaching Latino students. Language Arts, 65(5), 465–472.Google Scholar
  37. Moll, L. (1989). Teaching second-language students: A Vygotskian perspective. In D. M. Johnson & D. H. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing: Empowering ESL students (pp. 55–69). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  38. Morales, H., Lena L. K., & Chval, K. (2003). Beyond discourse: A multimodal perspective of learning mathematics in a multilingual context. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3, 133–140.Google Scholar
  39. Moschkovich, J. (1999). Supporting the participation of English language learners in mathematical discussions. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(1), 11–19.Google Scholar
  40. Moschkovich, J. (2002). A situated and sociocultural perspective on bilingual mathematics learners. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4(2–3), 189–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Moschkovich, J. (2010). Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Moschkovich, J. N. (2012). Mathematics, the Common Core, and language: Recommendations for mathematics instruction for ELLs aligned with the Common Core. In Proceedings of the Understanding Language Conference. Stanford, CA: Stanford University. Retrieved from http://ell.stanford.edu/publication/mathematics-common-core-and-language.
  43. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.Google Scholar
  44. Raborn, D. T. (1995). Mathematics for students with learning disabilities from language-minority backgrounds: Recommendations for teaching. New York State Association for Bilingual Education Journal, 10, 25–33.Google Scholar
  45. Reeves, J. (2006). Secondary teacher attitudes toward including English-Language Learners in mainstream classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(3), 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanders, N. M. (1966). Classroom questions: What kinds?. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  47. Secada, W. G., & De La Cruz, Y. (1996). Teaching mathematics for understanding to bilingual students. In J. L. Flores (Ed.), Children of la Frontera (pp. 285–308). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.Google Scholar
  48. Setati, M. (1998). Code-switching in a senior primary class of second-language mathematics learners. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18(1), 34–40.Google Scholar
  49. Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2000). Between languages and discourses: language practices in primary multilingual mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43, 243–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Son, J., & Kim, O. (2015). Teachers’ selection and enactment of mathematical problems from textbooks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 27(4), 491–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Son, J., & Kim, O. (2016). Curriculum enactment patterns and associated factors from teachers’ perspectives. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(4), 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sowder, J. (2007). The mathematical education and professional development of teachers. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157–224). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  54. Stigler, J. W., Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (1996). Traditions of school mathematics in Japanese and American elementary classrooms. In L. P. Steffe, P. Nesher, P. Cobb, G. A. Goldin, & B. Greer (Eds.), Theories of Mathematical Learning (pp. 149–175). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  55. TEACH MATH. (2012). Culturally responsive mathematics teaching lesson analysis tool. Unpublished Instrument.Google Scholar
  56. Villegas, A., & Lucas, T. (2002). Preparing culturally responsive teachers: Rethinking the curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(1), 20–32.Google Scholar
  57. Vomvoridi-Ivanović, E. (2012). Using culture as a resource in mathematics: the case of four Mexican-American prospective teachers in a bilingual after-school program. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 15(1), 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wisconsin Center for Educational Research (WCER). (1992). Mathematics classroom observation protocol. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  59. Yoon, Y. N. (2010). A study on the current status of “Korean for learning” of multicultural students in elementary school and support methodology for it. Seoul National University of Education.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Iowa State UniversityAmesUSA
  2. 2.Seoul National University of EducationSeoulKorea (Republic of)
  3. 3.Department of Learning and InstitutionUniversity at Buffalo - SUNYBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations