Advertisement

Effect of Glass Fibers and Aramid Fiber on Mechanical Properties of Composite Based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Skin

  • Benni F. RamadhoniEmail author
  • Ara Gradiniar Rizkyta
  • Atik Bintoro
  • Afid Nugroho
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The use of carbon-based fiber that can disrupt radar signal transmission on the flights especially on UAV remains problem. To address the problem, composites based UAV skin using E-glass, S-glass and aramid fibres as well as epoxy resin has been successfully manufactured by vacuum infusion process. Full factorial design of experiment (DoE) and analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed using Minitab 16 to analyse the effects of layer variations on specific tensile, compression and bonding shear. Fiber configuration was divided into two layers, namely layer 1–9 and 10–18. In general, mechanical properties i.e. tensile strength, bonding shears and compression strength increased compared with epoxy resin properties. Tensile strength and modulus increased by 484% and 204% respectively, while bonding shear and compressive strength increased by 24226% and 94% respectively. The overall result indicated that the best properties of composites-based UAV skin were obtained by the utilization of aramid fiber.

Keywords

Composite Mechanical properties UAV 

References

  1. 1.
    Karger-Kocsis, J., et al.: Interphase engineering with nanofillers in fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Interface/interphase in Polymer Nanocomposites, pp. 71–102 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Muhammed, O.S., Hussein, A.K., Abdel-Rahim, R.H.: Effect of filler type on some physical and mechanical properties of carbon fibers/polyester composites. Eng. Tech J. 31 Part (A)(15) (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    He, X., Li, Y., Nie, M.: Root-like glass fiber with branched fiber prepared via molecular self-assembly. R. Soc. Chem. 6, 45492–45494 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goh, G.D., Agarwala, S., Goh, G.L.: Challenges and potential, aerospace science and technology. Additive Manufacturing in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAVs), pp. 45492–45496 (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fan, Y., Yang, H., Liu, X.: Preparation and study on radar absorbing materials of nickel-coated carbon fiber and flake graphite. J. Alloy. Compd. 461, 490–494 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Maley, A.J.: An investigation into low-cost manufacturing of carbon epoxy composite and a novel “mouldless” technique using the Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Moulding (VARTM) method. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang, P., Drapier, S., Molimard, J.: Numerical and experimental analysis of resin infusion manufacturing processes of composite materials. J. Compos. Mater. 46(13), 1617–1631 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mohd Yuhazri, Y., Phongsakon, P.T., Sihombing, H.: A comparison process between vacuum infusion and hand lay-up method toward Kenaf/Polyster composites. Int. J. Basic Appl. Sci. IJBAS-IJENS 10(03) (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jogi, S.A., et al.: Evaluation of impact strength of epoxy based hybrid composites reinforced with E-Glass/Kevlar 49. Mehran Univ. Res. J. Eng. Technol. 36(4) (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benni F. Ramadhoni
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ara Gradiniar Rizkyta
    • 1
  • Atik Bintoro
    • 2
  • Afid Nugroho
    • 2
  1. 1.Balai Teknologi PolimerTangerang SelatanIndonesia
  2. 2.Pusat Teknologi PenerbanganBogorIndonesia

Personalised recommendations