Advertisement

Parametric Investigation of Bridge Piers Reinforced with Shape-Memory Alloys in Plastic Hinge Regions

  • Kanan ThakkarEmail author
  • Anant Parghi
Conference paper
  • 42 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 56)

Abstract

Bridge piers are one of the most vulnerable structural elements in a bridge system. The past earthquake reconnaissance report showed that the bridge structures with high residual displacements were unserviceable for the future use after a seismic event. Subsequently, post-disaster rescue and relief operations were rigorously affected. Generally, it is presumed that the utmost seismic demand in a bridge will focus in a small zone, which has a maximum inelastic curvature called as its plastic hinge length. As the bridge pier’s plastic hinge zone governs the load carrying and deformation capabilities of the entire pier, hence it has achieved remarkable focus to structural designers for the last decades to improve the ductility of a pier. Shape memory alloy (SMA) is distinctive class of smart materials, which can sustain the enormous amount of inelastic deformations and reappear to its parental shape after removal of stress or loading. Substituting the typical steel reinforcement in the plastic hinge region of a bridge pier with super-elastic SMA could diminish the damages of a pier. The present research is focused on the numerical investigation on circular concrete bridge piers reinforced with SMA rebars in plastic hinge region and rest part of a pier reinforced with conventional steel under the effect of monotonic static loads. The parameters considered in this study are plastic hinge length and material properties of SMA. Nonlinear static pushover analysis is performed to compare the behavior of steel-RC and SMA-RC bridge piers under the effect of monotonic load. The results are presented in terms of base shear, displacement, ductility and limit state performance criteria of bridge piers.

Keywords

Shape-Memory Alloy Plastic hinge length   Bridge piers Static pushover analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Abdulridha A, Palermo D, Foo S, Vecchio FJ (2013) Behavior and modeling of superelastic shape memory alloy reinforced concrete beams. Eng Struct 49:893–904.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alam MS, Nehdi M, Youssef MA (2008) Shape memory alloy-based smart RC bridges: overview of state-of-the-art. Smart Struct Syst 4(3):367–389.  https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2008.4.3.367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alam MS, Nehdi M, Youssef MA (2009) Seismic performance of concrete frame structures reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloys. Smart Struct Syst 5:565–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alam MS, Youssef MA, Nehdi M (2007) Utilizing shape memory alloys to enhance the performance and safety of civil infrastructure: a review. Can J Civ Eng 34(9):1075–1086.  https://doi.org/10.1139/l07-038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alam MS, Youssef MA, Nehdi ML (2010) Exploratory investigation on mechanical anchors for connecting SMA bars to steel or FRP bars. Mater Struct 43:91–107.  https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-010-9601-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andrawes B, Shin M (2008) Seismic retrofitting of bridge columns using shape memory alloys. In: SPIE—the international society for optical engineering, vol 6928, pp 69281K–1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1117/12.775480
  7. 7.
    Bajoria KM, Kaduskar S (2016) A review on: shape memory alloy and its application in civil structures. Int J Eng Res 5(3):721–724Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Billah M, Alam MS (2012) Seismic performance of concrete columns reinforced with hybrid shape memory alloy (SMA) and fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) bars. Constr Build Mater 28(1):730–742.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.10.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Billah M, Alam MS (2015) Seismic fragility assessment of concrete bridge pier reinforced with superelastic shape memory alloy. Earthq Spectra 31(3):1515–1541.  https://doi.org/10.1193/112512EQS337MCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Billah M, Alam MS (2016) Plastic hinge length of shape memory alloy (SMA) reinforced concrete bridge pier. Eng Struct 117:321–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.02.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boroschek RL, Farias G, Moroni O, Sarrazin M (2007) Effect of SMA braces in a steel frame building. J Earthq Eng 11(3):326–342.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460601125763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cai CS, Wu W, Chen S, Voyiadjis G (2003) Applications of smart materials in structural engineering. Department of Civil Engineering Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803 LTRC Project No. 02-4TIRE State Project No. 736-99-1055Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dong J, Cai CS, Okeil AM (2011) Overview of potential and existing applications of shape memory alloys in bridges. J Bridge Eng 16(2):305–315.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fugazza D (2003) Shape-memory alloy devices in earthquake engineering: mechanical properties, constitutive modelling and numerical simulations. European school of advanced studies in reduction of seismic risk, pp 1–141Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hedayati-Dezfuli F, Alam MS (2015) Seismic vulnerability assessment of a multi-span continuous steel-girder bridge isolated by SMA wire-based natural rubber bearings (SMA-NRB). In: Structures congress 2015—proceedings of the 2015 structures congress.  https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784479117.052
  16. 16.
    Madas P (1993) Advanced modelling of composite frames subjected to earthquake loading. Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College, University of London, London (UK)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Madas P, Elnashai AS (1992) A new passive confinement model for the analysis of concrete structures subjected to cyclic and transient dynamic loading. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 21(5):409–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mander JB, Priestley MJN, Park R (1988) Theoritical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng-ASCE 114(8):1804–1825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Martinez-Rueda JE, Elnashai AS (1997) Confined concrete model under cyclic load. Mater Struct 30(3):139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Menegotto M, Pinto PE (1973) Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending. Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Otani S (1974) SAKE: a computer program for inelastic response of R/C frames to earthquakes. University of Illinois Engineering Experiment Station. College of Engineering. University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ozbulut OE, Hurlebaus S, Desroches R (2011) Seismic response control using shape memory alloys: a review. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 22(14):1531–1549.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1045389X11411220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Palermo D (2011) Super elastic SMA reinforced concrete elements: applicability and practicability. In: Fib symposium PRAGUE, concrete engineering for excellence and efficiencyGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parghi A (2016) Seismic performance evaluation of circular reinforced concrete bridge piers retrofitted with fibre reinforced polymer. PhD. Thesis, University of British Columbia, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Paule T, Prisley MNJ (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. 2nd ed. WileyGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Saiidi MS, Wang H (2006) An exploratory study of seismic response of concrete columns with shape memory alloys reinforcement. ACI Struct J 103(3):436–443Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schoettler MJ, Restrepo JI, Guerrini G, Duck DE (2015) A full-scale, single-column bridge bent tested by shake-table excitation. Pacific earthquake engineering research center (PEER), BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    SeismoStruct (2018) SeismoStruct- a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures, Italy. www.Seismosoft.com
  29. 29.
    Shrestha B, Hao H (2014) Comparison of performance of shape memory alloy reinforced bridge piers with conventional bridge piers using incremental dynamic analysis. In: Smith ST (ed.) 23rd Australasian conference on the mechanics of structures and materials, vol I, pp 375–380, Byron Bay, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zadeh MS, Brien MO, Saiidi MS (2007) A study of concrete bridge columns using innovative materials subjected to cyclic loading: a report by University of Nevada Reno and National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zulfiqar N, Filippou FC (1990) Models of critical regions in reinforced concrete frames under earthquake excitations. Report No. EERC 90-06, University of California, Berkeley, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied MechanicsS. V. National Institute of TechnologySuratIndia

Personalised recommendations