Advertisement

Deaggregation of Seismic Hazards for Two Different Sites in Indore Region

  • Deepshikha ShuklaEmail author
  • C. H. Solanki
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 55)

Abstract

Education as well as health centers with advanced facilities play an important role in the growth and infrastructure development of any city. Past eight to nine decades have witnessed vast development in the infrastructure and these changes can be very clearly seen in Central Part of India namely Indore Region which has seen a lot many educational hubs like IIT and IIM. This region has also seen commercial development marking its importance in the economic development and growth of the region as a whole. To reduce the damage due to seismic activity, site-specific seismic hazarded analysis of these two institutes have been carried out using the probabilistic concepts. The study that has been carried out develops hazard curves and uniform hazards response spectra for three different probabilities of exceedance (50, 10, and 2%) in a span of 50 years. Seven different ground motion prediction equations have been used to estimate the uncertainty in the hazard estimation. To understand the seismic scenario of the earthquake sources, deaggregation of the seismic results has been done. Post deaggregation, it was observed that earthquakes with higher magnitude are contributing more significantly to the seismic activity for both the sites in Indore Region.

Keywords

Deaggregation Seismicity Hazard estimation Uniform hazard curves 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the valuable inputs given by Prof (Dr.) DeepankarChoudhary, IIT Mumbai, M. ASCE. We also extend our sincere thanks to India Meteorological Department (IMD), New Delhi for sharing the valuable earthquake data for the study area.

References

  1. 1.
    Jaiswal K, Sinha R (2007) Spatial variation of maximum considered and design basis earthquakes in peninsular India. Curr Sci 92(5):639–645Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bazzurro P, Cornell CA (1999) Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seism Soc Am 89:501–520Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shukla J, Choudhury D (2012) Seismic hazard and site specific ground motion for typical ports of Gujarat. Nat Hazards 60(2):541–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tinti S, Mulargia F (1985) Completeness analysis of a seismic catalog. Ann Geophys 3:407–414Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Desai S, Choudhury D (2014) Deterministic seismic hazards analysis for greater Mumbai, India. Geotechnical Special Publication No GSP 234, ASCE (ISBN 978-0-7844-1329-6), pp 389–398.  https://doi.org/10.1061/978084413272.038
  6. 6.
    Raghu Kanth STG, Iyengar RN (2006) Seismic hazard estimation for Mumbai city. Curr Sci 91(11):1486–1494Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abrahamson NA, Silva WJ (1997) Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):94–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boore DM, Joyner WB, Fumal TE (1997) Equations from estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from Western North American earthquakes: a summary of recent work. Seismol Res Lett 68:128–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campbell KW (1997) Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismol Res Lett 68(1):154–179MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sadigh K, Chang CY, Egan JA, Makdisi F, Youngs RR (1997) Attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismol Res Lett 68:180–189Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Toro GR, Abrahamson NA, Schneider JF (1997) Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in central and eastern North America: best estimates and uncertainties. Seismol Res Lett 68:41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Atkinson GM, Boore DM (1997) Some comparisons between recent ground motion relationships. Seismol Res Lett 68:24–40Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    CRISIS (2007) Version 7.2 Program for Computing Seismic Hazard developed by Ordaz M, Aguilar A, Arboleda. Instituto de Ingenieria, UNAM, MexicoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Mechanics DepartmentSVNITSuratIndia

Personalised recommendations