Advertisement

Design of Water Retaining Embankment Using Geosynthetics for Hydraulic Conditions

  • Shubham SoniEmail author
  • Amit Prashant
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 55)

Abstract

Sand is often used in chimney and blanket drain to control the seepage inside the water retaining embankment. On many sites it is not economical to find a sufficient quantity of good quality sand. The objective of the present study is to minimize use of sand in design of water-retaining embankment by using geosynthetics material to control the seepage. Accordingly, two alternative designs of water retaining embankment with internal drainage system have been proposed. These designs are ‘water retaining embankment with vertical drainage composite’ and ‘water retaining embankment with horizontal drainage composite’. The functions of geosynthetics in both the designs are filtration and drainage, and the geosynthetics material used are geotextile, drainage composite (geonet sandwiched by geotextile) and perforated pipe. The performance of geosynthetics for drainage and filtration in various structures like earth dam, retaining wall, highway drains and landfills provides confidence to use geosynthetics effectively in place of sand in water retaining embankment. A detailed methodology is set to determine the drainage and filtration requirement of geosynthetics material in each component of proposed alternative designs. The specifications required for geosynthetics material in each component of the proposed alternative design are also given. Depending upon the requirement any one of the alternatives can be used in place of the conventional system.

Keywords

Seepage Internal drainage Drainage composite Filtration Drainage 

References

  1. 1.
    Faure YH et al (1999) Analysis of geotextile filter behaviour after 21 years in Valcros dam. Geotext Geomembr 17(5):353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Degoutte Gérard (1987) Practical examples of geotextile used in small earth dams. Geotext Geomembr 5(4):239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vogt Volkmer M, Gerheim Souza Dias T (2012) Design and construction aspects of a geocomposite drainage system in a dam. In: 2nd Pan-American geosynthetics conference: geoamericasGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Koerner GR, Koerner RM, Wilson-Fahmy RF (1996) Field performance of geosynthetic highway drainage systems. In: Recent developments in geotextile filters and prefabricated drainage geocomposites. ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang DT-T, Wu JY, Nieh YC (1996) Use of geosynthetics in the uplift pressure relief system for a raft foundation. In: Recent developments in geotextile filters and prefabricated drainage geocomposites. ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McKean Jim, Inouye Ken (2001) Field evaluation of the long-term performance of geocomposite sheet drains. Geotext Geomembr 19(4):213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Palmeira EM, Gardoni MG (2000) The influence of partial clogging and pressure on the behaviour of geotextiles in drainage systems. Geosynth Int 7(4-6):403–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Palmeira Ennio M, Gardoni Maria G (2002) Drainage and filtration properties of non-woven geotextiles under confinement using different experimental techniques. Geotext Geomembr 20(2):97–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pak Ali, Zahmatkesh Zahra (2011) Experimental study of geotextile’s drainage and filteration propertis under different hydraulic gradients and confining pressures. Int J Civ Eng 9(2):98–102Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hwu B, Koerner RM, Sprague CJ (1990) Geotextile intrusion into geonets. In: Proceedings of the international conference on geotextiles, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Degoutte G, Fry JJ (2002) Geotextiles in dams, feedback. In: Technical symposium on geotextiles and geomembranes in dams, held on behalf of CFG and FCOLD, 29 pGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luettich SM, Giroud JP, Bachus RC (1992) Geotextile filter design guide. Geotext Geomembr 11(4-6):355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    AASHTO (2006) Standard specifications for geotextiles—M 288, Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing, 26th edn. American Association of State Transportation and Highway Officials, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    IRC ( 2002) Guidelines for use of geotextiles in road pavements and associated works. SP—59, India Roads Congress, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carroll RC (1987) Hydraulic properties of geotextiles. In: Geotextile testing and the design engineer. ASTM InternationalGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Berg RR, Christopher BR, Samtani NC (2009) Design of mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes–volume I. No. FHWA-NHI-10-024Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sinha R (2005) Geo environmental design practice in fly ash disposal & utilization. Allied PublishersGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Giroud J-P (1981) Designing with geotextiles. Mater Struct 14(4):257–272Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Technical manual (2007) Plastic pipe used in embankment dam FEMAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    IS: 9429, Drainage system for Earth and Rockfill DamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban Development and Administration DepartmentBhopalIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Technology GandhinagarGandhinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations