Geochemical modelling for prediction of chloride diffusion in concrete exposed to seawater

  • Hoang Long Nguyen
  • Van Quan TranEmail author
  • Long Khanh Nguyen
  • Tuan Anh Pham
  • Quoc Trinh Ngo
  • Van Loi Giap
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 54)


Steel corrosion is one of major problems that affect the durability of reinforced concrete structures. Chloride concentration is the key parameter for the steel corrosion risk of reinforced concrete exposed to seawater. Therefore, the durability of reinforced concrete can be evaluated by the prediction of chloride concentration into the reinforced concrete. Numerous numerical models have been developed to predict the chloride concentration in concrete however these numerical models have not yet fully simulated the nature of the chemo-physical processes taking place between the concrete and seawater. In this study, the prediction of chloride concentration is carried out by using the geochemical model including chemo-physical process. The geochemical model can improve the accuracy of the durability prediction of reinforced concrete. The accuracy of durability prediction is proved by the comparisons between modelled results and experiments results found in the literature.


Reinforced concrete seawater durability chloride geochemical model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



This research is funded by Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant number 107.99-2018.337.


  1. 1.
    E. Samson and J. Marchand, “Modeling the transport of ions in unsaturated cement-based materials,” Comput. Struct., vol. 85, no. 23–24, pp. 1740–1756, (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Baroghel-Bouny, M. Thiéry, and X. Wang, “Modelling of isothermal coupled moisture–ion transport in cementitious materials,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 828–841, (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Samson and J. Marchand, “Modeling the effect of temperature on ionic transport in cementitious materials,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 455–468, (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Xu, N. Spycher, and E. Sonnenthal, “TOUGHREACT User’s Guide: A Simulation Program for Non-isothermal Multiphase Reactive Transport in Variably Saturated Geologic Media, version 2.0,” Lawrence Berkeley …, no. October, (2012).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. L. Parkhurst and C. A. J. Appelo, “Description of input and examples for PHREEQC Version 3 — A computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations,” U.S. Geol. Surv. Tech. Methods, B. 6, chapter A43, (2013).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Blanc et al., “Thermoddem: A geochemical database focused on low temperature water/rock interactions and waste materials,” Appl. Geochemistry, (2012).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. C. Lasaga, J. M. Soler, J. Ganor, T. E. Burch, and K. L. Nagy, “Chemical weathering rate laws and global geochemical cycles,” Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 2361–2386, (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    I. Baur, P. Keller, D. Mavrocordatos, B. Wehrli, and C. A. Johnson, “Dissolution-precipitation behaviour of ettringite, monosulfate, and calcium silicate hydrate,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 341–348, (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. Henrik and E. Sørensen, “Chloride ingress in old Danish bridges,” (2014).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    T. Luping, “Cement and Concrete Research Engineering expression of the ClinConc model for prediction of free and total chloride ingress in submerged marine concrete,” vol. 38, pp. 1092–1097, (2008).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. A. Kulik et al., “GEM-Selektor geochemical modeling package: revised algorithm and GEMS3K numerical kernel for coupled simulation codes,” Comput. Geosci., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–24, (2013).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. L. Parkhurst and C. A. J. Appelo, “User’s Guide To PHREEQC (version 2) — a Computer Program for Speciation, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations,” U.S. Geol. Surv. Water-Resources Investig. Rep., (1999).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    U. Angst, B. Elsener, C. K. Larsen, and Ø. Vennesland, “Critical chloride content in reinforced concrete - A review,” Cem. Concr. Res., vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1122–1138, (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hoang Long Nguyen
    • 1
  • Van Quan Tran
    • 1
    Email author
  • Long Khanh Nguyen
    • 1
  • Tuan Anh Pham
    • 1
  • Quoc Trinh Ngo
    • 1
  • Van Loi Giap
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Transport TechnologyHanoiVietnam

Personalised recommendations