Advertisement

A Gradient-Damage Model for Cyclic Behavior of Concrete

  • A. H. Monnamitheen Abdul GafoorEmail author
  • D. Dinkler
Conference paper
  • 18 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

The present paper elaborates a continuum formulation using a single loading surface that relates a unified equivalent strain with a history deformation parameter to characterize both the softening and hardening behaviors of the material. The history parameter governs the growth of damage. Two additional history parameters capture the crack-opening/closure effectively. The model further incorporates an implicit-gradient regularization to avoid numerical difficulties such as localization of deformation into a vanishing size and ill-posedness of the boundary value problem. Numerical results exhibit good agreement with experimental data under several tests. Finally, the paper demonstrates the localization of deformation due to a gradient-enhanced variable.

Keywords

Isotropic damage History parameter Evolution law Implicit-gradient 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The financial supports by DAAD (Research Grants, No.:57048249) and DFG (GRK 2075) are greatly acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Bažant Z, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1988) Nonlocal continuum damage, localization instability and convergence. J Appl Mech 55(2):287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peerlings R, De Borst R, Brekelmans W, Geers M (1998) Gradient-enhanced damage modelling of concrete fracture. Mech Cohesive-Frict Mater 3(4):323–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Monnamitheen Abdul Gafoor AH, Dinkler D (2016) Influence of deformation history parameters on softening behaviour of concrete. PAMM 16(1):155–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mazars J, Pijaudier-Cabot G (1989) Continuum damage theory-application to concrete. J Eng Mech 115(2):345–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mazars J, Hamon F, Grange S (2015) A new 3d damage model for concrete under monotonic, cyclic and dynamic loadings. Mater Struct 48(11):3779–3793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Monnamitheen Abdul Gafoor AH, Dinkler D (2017) A model for coupled inelastic deformation and anisotropic damage behaviour of concrete. PAMM 17(1):241–242.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pamm.201710090, https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pamm.201710090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee J, Fenves G (1998) Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. J Eng Mech 124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gopalaratnam V, Shah S (1985) Softening response of plain concrete in direct tension. J Proc 82(3):310–323Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karsan I, Jirsa J (1969) Behavior of concrete under compressive loadings. J Struct Div 95(12):2543–2564Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mazars J, Berthaud Y, Ramtani S (1990) The unilateral behaviour of damaged concrete. Eng Fract Mech 35(4):629–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Structural AnalysisTechnische Universität BraunschweigBrunswickGermany

Personalised recommendations