Advertisement

The ‘Truth’ About Pakistan: Knowledge Production and Circulation in Area Studies

  • Ahmed W. WaheedEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter begins by exploring the development of the Area Studies enterprise beginning in the Cold War. The chapter argues that during the Cold War, Pakistan caught the attention of western policy-makers for primarily security reasons and continues to do so, for this reason most of the scholarship on Pakistan is largely focused on Pakistan’s security and Pakistan’s relationship with ‘international’ security. The chapter further explores Area Studies centers for their potential in producing knowledge on Pakistan. The data on Area Studies centers unveils two distinct patterns. First, it has unveiled the endemic lack of interest on the part of western knowledge producers in knowing Pakistan and the other states that make up the South Asian region. Secondly, while true to their proposed research ambit, South Asian area study centers across the West have intellectually explored India across the depths and breadths of various disciplines, so that the study of India has become a truly multidisciplinary enterprise, in the case of Pakistan, most of the research, however marginal, remains centered on matters of its security and international affairs. Finally the chapter analyzes the contributions on Pakistan in Area Studies journals to observe how Pakistan’s representational identity is discursively constructed.

Bibliography

  1. Acharya, Amitav. “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds.” International Studies Quarterly 58, no. 4 (December 1, 2014): 647–59.  https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12171.Google Scholar
  2. Appadurai, Arjun. “Grassroots Globalization and the Research Imagination.” Public Culture 12, no. 1 (2000): 1–19.Google Scholar
  3. Arturo Escobar. “Anthropology and the Development Encounter: The Making and Marketing of Development Anthropology.” American Ethnologist 18, no. 4 (1991): 658–82.Google Scholar
  4. ———. “Beyond the Third World: Imperial Globality, Global Coloniality and Anti-Globalisation Social Movements.” Third World Quarterly 25, no. 1 (2004): 207–30.Google Scholar
  5. Bates, Robert H. “Letter from the President: Area Studies and the Discipline.” Newsletter of the APSA Organised Section in Comparative Politics 7, no. 1 (1996): 1–16.Google Scholar
  6. ———. “Area Studies and the Discipline: A Useful Controversy?” PS: Political Science and Politics 30, no. 2 (1997): 166–69.Google Scholar
  7. Charsley, Katharine. Transnational Pakistani Connections Marrying ‘Back Home.’ 1st ed. London and New York: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar
  8. Chun, A. “The Postcolonial Alien in Us All: Identity in the Global Division of Intellectual Labor.” Positions: East Asia Cultures Critique 16, no. 3 (December 1, 2008): 689–710.  https://doi.org/10.1215/10679847-2008-018.Google Scholar
  9. Dirks, Nicholas B. “South Asian Studies: Futures Past.” In The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Disciplines, edited by David L. Szanton, 341–85. University of California Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Dreyfuss, Robert. Devil’s Game: How the United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam. Metropolitan Books, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. Enemark, Christian. “Drones over Pakistan: Secrecy, Ethics, and Counterinsurgency.” Asian Security 7, no. 3 (September 2011): 218–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2011.615082.Google Scholar
  12. Escobar, Arturo. “Imagining a Post-development Era? Critical Thought, Development and Social Movements.” Social Text, no. 31/32 (1992): 20–56.  https://doi.org/10.2307/466217.
  13. ———. “Power and Visibility: Development and the Invention and Management of the Third World.” Cultural Anthropology. Wiley American Anthropological Association, n.d.  https://doi.org/10.2307/656487.
  14. Fair, C. Christine. “Militant Recruitment in Pakistan: A New Look at the Militancy-Madrasah Connection.” Asia Policy 4, no. 1 (2007): 107–34.Google Scholar
  15. ———. “The Militant Challenge in Pakistan.” Asia Policy 11 (2011): 105–38.Google Scholar
  16. Gayer, Laurent. “Guns, Slums, and ‘Yellow Devils’: A Genealogy of Urban Conflicts in Karachi, Pakistan.” Modern Asian Studies 41, no. 3 (May 11, 2007): 515–44.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X06002599.Google Scholar
  17. Gibson-Graham, J.K. “Area Studies After Poststructuralism.” Environment and Planning A 36, no. 3 (March 1, 2004): 405–19.  https://doi.org/10.1068/a3652.Google Scholar
  18. Grare, Frédéric. “The Evolution of Sectarian Conflicts in Pakistan and the Ever-Changing Face of Islamic Violence.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 30, no. 1 (April 30, 2007): 127–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00856400701264068.Google Scholar
  19. Hagmann, Jonas, and Thomas J. Biersteker. “Beyond the Published Discipline: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of International Studies.” European Journal of International Relations 20, no. 2 (June 18, 2014): 291–315.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066112449879.Google Scholar
  20. Hanson, Stephen E. “The Contribution of Area Studies.” In The Sage Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Todd Landman and Neil Robinson, 541. Sage Publishers, 2009.Google Scholar
  21. Hoffman, Stanley. “An American Social Science: International Relations.” Daedalus 106, no. 3 (1977): 41–60. https://www.amherst.edu/system/files/media/0084/Hoffman.pdf.
  22. Jackson, Peter A. “The Neoliberal University and Global Immobilities of Theory.” In Area Studies at the Crossroads: Knowledge Production After the Mobility Turn, edited by Katja Mielke and Anna-Katharina Hornidge, 27–44. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59834-9_1.Google Scholar
  23. Johnson, Chalmer. “Preconception vs. Observation, or the Contributions of Rational Choice Theory and Area Studies to Contemporary Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 30, no. 2 (1997): 170–74.Google Scholar
  24. Katzenstein, Peter J. “Area and Regional Studies in the United States.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34, no. 4 (2001): 789–91.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1350268.
  25. Khan, Feisal. “Corruption and the Decline of the State in Pakistan.” Asian Journal of Political Science 15, no. 2 (August 2007): 219–47.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02185370701511644.Google Scholar
  26. Ludden, David. “Area Studies in the Age of Globalization.” Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad 6 (2000): 1–22.Google Scholar
  27. Manuela Boatcã. “Catching Up with the (New) West: The German ‘Excellence Initiative,’ Area Studies, and the Re-production of Inequality.” Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge 10, no. 1 (2012): 17–30.Google Scholar
  28. Mielke, Katja, and Anna-Katharina Hornidge, eds. Area Studies at the Crossroads: Knowledge Production After the Mobility Turn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar
  29. Milliken, Jennifer. “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods.” European Journal of International Relations 5, no. 2 (1999): 225–54.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066199005002003.Google Scholar
  30. Murad, A. “US Aid to Pakistan and Democracy.” Policy Perspectives 6, no. 2 (2009): 1–40.Google Scholar
  31. Rafael, Vicente L. “Regionalism, Area Studies, and the Accidents of Agency.” The American Historical Review 104, no. 4 (October 1999): 1208–20.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2649568.Google Scholar
  32. ———. “The Cultures of Area Studies in the United States.” Social Text 41, no. 41 (1994): 91–111.  https://doi.org/10.2307/466834.
  33. Schueller, Malini J. “Area Studies and Multicultural Imperialism: The Project of Decolonizing Knowledge.” Social Text 25, no. 1 90 (March 1, 2007): 41–62.  https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-2006-016.Google Scholar
  34. Soherwordi, Syed H.S. “‘Punjabisation’ in the British Indian Army 1857–1947 and the Advent of Military Rule in Pakistan.” Edinburgh Papers in South Asian Studies Number. Vol. 24, 2010. www.csas.ed.ac.uk.
  35. Szanton, David L. The Politics of Knowledge: Area Studies and the Discipline. Edited by David Szanton. Vol. 3. University of California Press, 2004. https://www.ucpress.edu/book.php?isbn=9780520245365.
  36. Teti, Andrea. “Bridging the Gap: IR, Middle East Studies and the Disciplinary Politics of the Area Studies Controversy.” European Journal of International Relations 13, no. 1 (March 25, 2007): 117–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074291.Google Scholar
  37. Tharoor, Ishaan. “The Taliban Indoctrinates Kids with Jihadist Textbooks Paid for by the U.S.” The Washington Post, December 2014. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/12/08/the-taliban-indoctrinates-kids-with-jihadist-textbooks-paid-for-by-the-u-s/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.fe1c2c219d73.
  38. Wagley, Charles. “Area Research and Training: A Conference Report on the Study of World Areas.” New York: Social Science Research Council, 1948.Google Scholar
  39. Waheed, Ahmed. The Wrong Ally: Pakistan’s State Sovereignty Under US Dependence. Oxford: Peter Lang, 2018.Google Scholar
  40. Weinbaum, Marvin G., and Jonathan B. Harder. “Pakistan’s Afghan Policies and Their Consequences.” Contemporary South Asia 16, no. 1 (March 6, 2008): 25–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for International Peace & StabilityNational University of Sciences and TechnologyIslamabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations