Advertisement

Sampling Approaches

  • Ping JiangEmail author
  • Qi Zhou
  • Xinyu Shao
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering book series (STME)

Abstract

The design of experiments (DoE) is a key process in constructing a surrogate model: DoE methods are used to select the sample points at which simulations are to be conducted.

References

  1. Box GE, Behnken DW (1960) Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. 2:455–475Google Scholar
  2. Box GE, Hunter JS (1961) The 2 k − p fractional factorial designs 3:311–351Google Scholar
  3. Branchu S, Forbes RT, York P, Nyqvist H (1999) A central composite design to investigate the thermal stabilization of lysozyme. 16:702–708Google Scholar
  4. Chen W (1995) A robust concept exploration method for configuring complex systems. Georgia Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke SM, Griebsch JH, Simpson TW (2005) Analysis of support vector regression for approximation of complex engineering analyses. J Mech Des 127:1077–1087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coello CAC (2000) Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems. Comput Ind 41:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Currin C, Mitchell T, Morris M, Ylvisaker D (1988) A Bayesian approach to the design and analysis of computer experiments. Oak Ridge National Lab, TN (USA)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Currin C, Mitchell T, Morris M, Ylvisaker D (1991) Bayesian prediction of deterministic functions, with applications to the design and analysis of computer experiments. J Am Stat Assoc 86:953–963MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evans M, Swartz T (2000) Approximating integrals via Monte Carlo and deterministic methods. OUP OxfordGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang K-T, Lin DKJ (2003) Ch. 4. Uniform experimental designs and their applications in industry. 22:131–170Google Scholar
  11. Fang K-T, Lin DK, Winker P, Zhang Y (2000) Uniform design: theory and application. 42:237–248MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garud SS, Karimi IA, Kraft M (2017) Design of computer experiments: a review. 106:71–95Google Scholar
  13. Goel T, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Queipo NV (2007) Ensemble of surrogates. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33:199–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gratiet LL, Cannamela C (2012) Kriging-based sequential design strategies using fast cross-validation techniques with extensions to multi-fidelity computer codes. arXiv:1210.6187
  15. Hedayat AS, Sloane NJA, Stufken J (2012) Orthogonal arrays: theory and applications. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  16. Homaifar A, Qi CX, Lai SH (1994) Constrained optimization via genetic algorithms. Simulation 62:242–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jin R, Chen W, Sudjianto A (2002) On sequential sampling for global metamodeling in engineering design. In: ASME 2002 international design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference, pp 539–548. American Society of Mechanical EngineersGoogle Scholar
  18. Le Gratiet L, Cannamela C (2015) Cokriging-based sequential design strategies using fast cross-validation techniques for multi-fidelity computer codes. Technometrics 57:418–427MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lindley DV (1956) On a measure of the information provided by an experiment. Ann Math Stat 986–1005MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McKay MD, Beckman RJ, Conover WJ (2000) A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. 42:55–61Google Scholar
  21. Mordechai S (2011) Applications of Monte Carlo method in science and engineeringGoogle Scholar
  22. Morris MD, Mitchell TJ (1995) Exploratory designs for computational experiments. 43:381–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Myers RH, Montgomery DC, Anderson-Cook CM (2016) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. WileyGoogle Scholar
  24. Owen AB (1992) Orthogonal arrays for computer experiments, integration and visualization. 439–452Google Scholar
  25. Rasmussen CE (2004) Gaussian processes in machine learning. Advanced lectures on machine learning. Springer, pp 63–71Google Scholar
  26. Robert C, Casella G (2013) Monte Carlo statistical methods. Springer Science & Business MediaGoogle Scholar
  27. Roberts GO, Gelman A, Gilks WR (1997) Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms. Ann Appl Probab 7:110–120MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sacks J, Welch WJ, Mitchell TJ, Wynn HP (1989) Design and analysis of computer experiments. Stat Sci 409–423MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27:379–423MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shewry MC, Wynn HP (1987) Maximum entropy sampling. J Appl Stat 14:165–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Viana FA, Venter G, Balabanov V (2010) An algorithm for fast optimal Latin hypercube design of experiments. 82:135–156Google Scholar
  32. Xiao M, Gao L, Shao X, Qiu H, Jiang P (2012) A generalised collaborative optimisation method and its combination with kriging metamodels for engineering design. J Eng Des 23:379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou Q, Shao X, Jiang P, Zhou H, Cao L, Zhang L (2015a) A deterministic robust optimisation method under interval uncertainty based on the reverse model. J Eng Des 26:416–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhou Q, Shao X, Jiang P, Zhou H, Shu L (2015b) An adaptive global variable fidelity metamodeling strategy using a support vector regression based scaling function. Simul Model Pract Theory 59:18–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhou Q, Shao X, Jiang P, Gao Z, Zhou H, Shu L (2016) An active learning variable-fidelity metamodelling approach based on ensemble of metamodels and objective-oriented sequential sampling. J Eng Des 27:205–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhou Q, Wang Y, Choi S-K, Jiang P, Shao X, Hu J (2017) A sequential multi-fidelity metamodeling approach for data regression. Knowl Based Syst 134:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of Aerospace EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  3. 3.The State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations