Advertisement

Introduction

  • Ping JiangEmail author
  • Qi Zhou
  • Xinyu Shao
Chapter
Part of the Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering book series (STME)

Abstract

Simulation models have been widely used to study and analyse complex real-world systems in the design of many modern products, such as vehicles, civil structures and medical devices (Zhou et al. 2016a, 2017). Various types of engineering tasks utilize simulation models, including design space exploration, design optimization, performance prediction, operational management, sensitivity analysis and uncertainty analysis. There are also various problems, such as model calibration and model parameter sensitivity analysis, related to enhancing the ability of simulation models to faithfully reproduce real-world systems (Razavi et al. 2012).

References

  1. Acar E, Rais-Rohani M (2009) Ensemble of metamodels with optimized weight factors. Struct Multidiscip Optim 37:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandler JW, Cheng QS, Nikolova NK, Ismail MA (2004) Implicit space mapping optimization exploiting preassigned parameters. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 52:378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bishop CM (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgee S, Giunta AA, Balabanov V, Grossman B, Mason WH, Narducci R, Haftka RT, Watson LT (1996) A coarse-grained parallel variable-complexity multidisciplinary optimization paradigm. Int J Supercomput Appl High Perform Comput 10:269–299Google Scholar
  5. Can B, Heavey C (2012) A comparison of genetic programming and artificial neural networks in metamodeling of discrete-event simulation models. Comput Oper Res 39:424–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen VC, Tsui K-L, Barton RR, Meckesheimer M (2006) A review on design, modeling and applications of computer experiments. IIE Trans 38:273–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christelis V, Mantoglou A (2016) Pumping optimization of coastal aquifers assisted by adaptive metamodelling methods and radial basis functions. Water Resour Manage 30:5845–5859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crombecq K, Laermans E, Dhaene T (2011) Efficient space-filling and non-collapsing sequential design strategies for simulation-based modeling. Eur J Oper Res 214:683–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fang H, Horstemeyer MF (2006) Global response approximation with radial basis functions. Eng Optim 38:407–424MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang H, Rais-Rohani M, Liu Z, Horstemeyer M (2005) A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Comput Struct 83:2121–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kennedy MC, O’Hagan A (2000) Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available. Biometrika 87:1–13MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kleijnen JP (1987) Statistical tools for simulation practitioners. Marcel DekkerGoogle Scholar
  13. Kleijnen JP (2008) Response surface methodology for constrained simulation optimization: an overview. Simul Model Pract Theory 16:50–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleijnen JP (2009) Kriging metamodeling in simulation: a review. Eur J Oper Res 192:707–716MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rayas-Sanchez JE (2016) Power in simplicity with ASM: tracing the aggressive space mapping algorithm over two decades of development and engineering applications. IEEE Microwave Mag 17:64–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Razavi S, Tolson BA, Burn DH (2012) Review of surrogate modeling in water resources. Water Resour Res 48Google Scholar
  17. Shan S, Wang GG (2010) Survey of modeling and optimization strategies to solve high-dimensional design problems with computationally-expensive black-box functions. Struct Multidiscip Optim 41:219–241MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shu L, Jiang P, Wan L, Zhou Q, Shao X, Zhang Y (2017) Metamodel-based design optimization employing a novel sequential sampling strategy. Eng Comput 34:2547–2564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Simpson TW, Mauery TM, Korte JJ, Mistree F (2001) Kriging models for global approximation in simulation-based multidisciplinary design optimization. AIAA J 39:2233–2241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sun G, Li G, Li Q (2012) Variable fidelity design based surrogate and artificial bee colony algorithm for sheet metal forming process. Finite Elem Anal Des 59:76–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tyan M, Nguyen NV, Lee J-W (2015) Improving variable-fidelity modelling by exploring global design space and radial basis function networks for aerofoil design. Eng Optim 47:885–908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Van Gelder L, Das P, Janssen H, Roels S (2014) Comparative study of metamodelling techniques in building energy simulation: guidelines for practitioners. Simul Model Pract Theory 49:245–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Viana FA, Simpson TW, Balabanov V, Toropov V (2014) Special section on multidisciplinary design optimization: metamodeling in multidisciplinary design optimization: how far have we really come? AIAA J 52:670–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wan X (2009) Stochastic optimization with simulation based optimization: a surrogate model framework. VDM PublishingGoogle Scholar
  25. Xiao M, Gao L, Shao X, Qiu H, Jiang P (2012) A generalised collaborative optimisation method and its combination with kriging metamodels for engineering design. J Eng Des 23:379–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xiong S, Qian PZ, Wu CJ (2013) Sequential design and analysis of high-accuracy and low-accuracy computer codes. Technometrics 55:37–46MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zerpa LE, Queipo NV, Pintos S, Salager J-L (2005) An optimization methodology of alkaline–surfactant–polymer flooding processes using field scale numerical simulation and multiple surrogates. J Petrol Sci Eng 47:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zheng J, Shao X, Gao L, Jiang P, Li Z (2013) A hybrid variable-fidelity global approximation modelling method combining tuned radial basis function base and kriging correction. J Eng Des 24:604–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou XJ, Ma YZ, Li XF (2011) Ensemble of surrogates with recursive arithmetic average. Struct Multidiscip Optim 44:651–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhou Q, Shao X, Jiang P, Cao L, Zhou H, Shu L (2015) Differing mapping using ensemble of metamodels for global variable-fidelity metamodeling. CMES Comput Model Eng Sci 106:323–355Google Scholar
  31. Zhou Q, Shao X, Jiang P, Gao Z, Wang C, Shu L (2016a) An active learning metamodeling approach by sequentially exploiting difference information from variable-fidelity models. Adv Eng Inform 30:283–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou Q, Shao X, Jiang P, Gao Z, Zhou H, Shu L (2016b) An active learning variable-fidelity metamodelling approach based on ensemble of metamodels and objective-oriented sequential sampling. J Eng Des 27:205–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou Q, Wang Y, Jiang P, Shao X, Choi S-K, Hu J, Cao L, Meng X (2017) An active learning radial basis function modeling method based on self-organization maps for simulation-based design problems. Knowl Based Syst 131:10–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of Aerospace EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina
  3. 3.The State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and EngineeringHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations