Advertisement

Mode of Communication Between Plants During Environmental Stress

  • Sameer DixitEmail author
  • Akanchha Shukla
  • Santosh Kumar Upadhyay
  • Praveen Chandra Verma
Chapter
Part of the Energy, Environment, and Sustainability book series (ENENSU)

Abstract

Plants are considered to be intelligent enough to communicate with each other. This happens with the help of signals that are emitted by the emitter plant in response to any biotic or abiotic inducer. These signals are perceived by neighboring plant (receiver) and which enables them adapt better to the stress conditions. Plants communicate with the help of biological as well as chemical mediator or sometimes without any mediator. These cross-talks are mainly dedicated to share the information about the invading pathogen, mechanical injuries, and availability of light and nutrient. Generally, emitters are less benefited in all communications still the phenomenon evolves because it benefits the other member of emitter species. Plant communication is beyond the species boundary, both inter and intra species communications occur in nature. A very fine interplay of various gene networks regulates this communication resulting in change of gene expression profiles in both emitter as well as receiver plant. Plant communication might be used in future to protect crops against necrotrophic as well as biotropic pathogens.

Keywords

Eavesdropping Emitter Receiver Talking tree Volatile organic compounds 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to apologize to all the authors whose work we were unable to cite, because of space constraint, We express gratitude to all the lab members of the PC Verma laboratory for valuable discussions. We also like to acknowledge Dr. Nidhi Thakur and Varsha Srivastava for their constructive comments.

References

  1. Aratchige NS, Lesna I, Sabelis MW (2004) Below-ground plant parts emit herbivore-induced volatiles: olfactory responses of a predatory mite to tulip bulbs infested by rust mites. Exp Appl Acarol 33(1–2):21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arimura G, Ozawa R, Shimoda T, Nishioka T, Boland W, Takabayashi J (2000) Herbivory-induced volatiles elicit defense genes in lima bean leaves. Nature 406(6795):512–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arimura G, Ozawa R, Nishioka T, Boland W, Koch T, Kühnemann F, Takabayashi J (2002) Herbivore-induced volatiles induce the emission of ethylene in neighboring lima bean plants. Plant J 29(1):87–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Babikova Z, Johnson D, Bruce T, Pickett JA, Gilbert L (2013) How rapid is aphid-induced signal transfer between plants via common mycelial networks? Commun Integr Biol 6(6):e25904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baldwin IT, Schultz JC (1983) Rapid changes in tree leaf chemistry induced by damage: evidence for communication between plants. Science 221(4607):277–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin IT, Halitschke R, Paschold A, von Dahl CC, Preston CA (2006) Volatile signaling in plant–plant interactions: “talking trees” in the genomics era. Science 311(5762):812–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballaré CL (1999) Keeping up with the neighbours: phytochrome sensing and other signalling mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci 4(5):201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barto EK, Hilker M, Müller F, Mohney BK, Weidenhamer JD, Rillig MC (2011) The fungal fast lane: common mycorrhizal networks extend bioactive zones of allelochemicals in soils. PLoS ONE 6(11):e27195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bate NJ, Rothstein SJ (1998) C6-volatiles derived from the lipoxygenase pathway induce a subset of defense-related genes. Plant J 16(5):561–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birkett MA, Campbell CA, Chamberlain K, Guerrieri E, Hick AJ, Martin JL, Matthes M, Napier JA, Pettersson J, Pickett JA, Poppy GM (2000) New roles for cis-jasmone as an insect semiochemical and in plant defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(16):9329–9334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bruin J, Dicke M, Sabelis MW (1992) Plants are better protected against spider mites after exposure to volatiles from infested conspecifics. Experientia 48:525–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Creelman RA, Mullet JE (1997) Biosynthesis and action of jasmonates in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 48:355–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolch R, Tscharntke T (2000) Defoliation of alders (Alnus glutinosa) affects herbivory by leaf beetles on undamaged neighbours. Oecologia 125(4):504–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dorokhov YL, Komarova TV, Petrunia IV, Frolova OY, Pozdyshev DV, Gleba YY (2012) Airborne signals from a wounded leaf facilitate viral spreading and induce antibacterial resistance in neighboring plants. PLoS Pathog 8(4):e1002640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engelberth J, Alborn HT, Schmelz EA, Tumlinson JH (2004) Airborne signals prime plants against insect herbivore attack. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(6):1781–1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erb M, Ton J, Degenhardt J, Turlings TC (2008) Interactions between arthropod-induced aboveground and belowground defenses in plants. Plant Physiol 146(3):867–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Falik O, Mordoch Y, Ben-Natan D, Vanunu M, Goldstein O, Novoplansky A (2012) Plant responsiveness to root–root communication of stress cues. Ann Bot 110(2):271–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farag MA, Paré PW (2002) C6-Green leaf volatiles trigger local and systemic VOC emissions in tomato. Phytochemistry 61(5):545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farmer EE, Ryan CA (1990) Interplant communication: airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase inhibitors in plant leaves. Proc Natl Acad Sci 87(19):7713–7716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Frost CJ, Appel HM, Carlson JE, De Moraes CM, Mescher MC, Schultz JC (2007) Within-plant signalling via volatiles overcomes vascular constraints on systemic signalling and primes responses against herbivores. Ecol Lett 10(6):490–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gagliano M (2013) Green symphonies: a call for studies on acoustic communication in plants. Behav Ecol 24(4):789–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glinwood R, Ninkovic V, Pettersson J, Ahmed E (2004) Barley exposed to aerial allelopathyfromthistles (Cirsium spp.) becomes less acceptable to aphids. Ecol Entomol 29:188–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hatanaka A (1993) The biogeneration of green odour by green leaves. Phytochem 34:1201–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heil M (2008) Indirect defense via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol 178(1):41–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heil M, Silva Bueno JC (2007) Within-plant signaling by volatiles leads to induction and priming of an indirect plant defense in nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(13):5467–5472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hildebrand DF, Brown GC, Jackson DM, Hamilton-Kemp TR (1993) Effects of some leaf-emitted volatile compounds on aphid population increase. J Chem Ecol 19(9):1875–1887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hilker M, Meiners T (2002) The plant’s response towards insect egg deposition. In: Hilker M, Meiners T (eds) Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell Verlag, Oxford, pp 205–233Google Scholar
  28. Horiuchi J, Badri DV, Kimball BA, Negre F, Dudareva N, Paschke MW, Vivanco JM (2007) The floral volatile, methyl benzoate, from snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus) triggers phytotoxic effects in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 226(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Karban R, Yang LH, Edwards KF (2014) Volatile communication between plants that affects herbivory: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 17(1):44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kikuta Y, Ueda H, Nakayama K, Katsuda Y, Ozawa R, Takabayashi J, Hatanaka A, Matsuda K (2011) Specific regulation of pyrethrin biosynthesis in Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium by a blend of volatiles emitted from artificially damaged conspecific plants. Plant Cell Physiol 52(3):588–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kost C, Heil M (2006) Herbivore-induced plant volatiles induce an indirect defence in neighbouring plants. J Ecol 94(3):619–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Masters GJ, Jones TH, Rogers M (2001) Host-plant mediated effects of root herbivory on insect seed predators and their parasitoids. Oecologia 127(2):246–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Myers JH, Williams KS (1984) Does tent caterpillar attack reduce the food quality for red alder foliage? Oecologia 62:74–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Neveu N, Grandgirard J, Nenon JP, Cortesero AM (2002) Systemic release of herbivore-induced plant volatiles by turnips infested by concealed root-feeding larvae Delia radicum L. J Chem Ecol 28(9):1717–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pare PW, Tumlinson JH (1997) De novo biosynthesis of volatiles induced by insect herbivory in cotton plants. Plant Physiol 114(4):1161–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peng J, Van Loon JJA, Zheng S, Dicke M (2011) Herbivore-induced volatiles of cabbage (Brassica oleracea) prime defence responses in neighbouring intact plants. Plant biology 13(2):276–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pichersky E, Gershenzon J (2002) The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defense. Curr Opin Plant Biol 5(3):237–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Poveda K, Steffan-Dewenter I, Scheu S, Tscharntke T (2005) Effects of decomposers and herbivores on plant performance and aboveground plant-insect interactions. Oikos 108:503–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Preston CA, Laue G, Baldwin IT (2004) Plant–plant signaling: application of trans- or cis-methyl jasmonate equivalent to sagebrush releases does not elicit direct defenses in native tobacco. J Chem Ecol 30(11):2193–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramadan A, Muroi A, Arimura GI (2011) Herbivore-induced maize volatiles serve as priming cues for resistance against post-attack by the specialist armyworm Mythimna separata. J plant Interact 6(2–3):155–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rasmann S, Köllner TG, Degenhardt J, Hiltpold I, Toepfer S, Kuhlmann U, Gershenzon J, Turlings TC (2005) Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize roots. Nature 434(7034):732–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rhoades DF (1983) Responses of alder and willow to attack by tent caterpillars and webworms: evidence for phenomonal sensitivity of willows. In: Hedin PA (ed) Plant resistance to insects, symposium series 208. American Chemical Society, Washington DC, pp 55–68Google Scholar
  43. Rodriguez-Saona CR, Rodriguez-Saona LE, Frost CJ (2009) Herbivore-induced volatiles in the perennial shrub, Vaccinium corymbosum, and their role in inter-branch signaling. J Chem Ecol 35(2):163–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rose U, Manukian A, Heath RR, Tumlinson JH (1996) volatile semiochemicals released from undamaged cotton leaves (a systemic response of living plants to caterpillar damage). Plant Physiol 111(2):487–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Runyon JB, Mescher MC, De Moraes CM (2006) Volatile chemical cues guide host location and host selection by parasitic plants. Science 313(5795):1964–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ruther J, Kleier S (2005) Plant-plant signaling: ethylene synergizes volatile emission in Zea mays induced by exposure to (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol. J Chem Ecol 31(9):2217–2222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shulaev V, Silverman P, Raskin I (1997) Airborne signalling by methyl salicylate in plant pathogen resistance. Nature 386:718–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simard SW, Perry DA, Jones MD, Myrold DD, Durall DM, Molina R (1997) Net transfer of carbon between ectomycorrhizal tree species in the field. Nature 388:579–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Song YY, Zeng RS, Xu JF, Li J, Shen X, Yihdego WG (2010) Interplant communication of tomato plants through underground common mycorrhizal networks. PLoS ONE 5(10):e13324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Theologis A (1992) One rotten apple spoils the whole bushel: the role of ethylene in fruit ripening. Cell 70(2):181–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thistle HW, Peterson H, Allwine G, Lamb B, Strand T, Holsten EH, Shea PJ (2004) Surrogate pheromone plumes in three forest trunk spaces: composite statistics and case studies. Forest Sci 50(16):610–625Google Scholar
  52. Ton J, D’alessandro M, Jourdie V, Jakab G, Karlen D, Held M, Mauch-Mani B, Turlings TC (2007) Priming by airborne signals boosts direct and indirect resistance in maize. Plant J 49(1):16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turlings TC, Tumlinson JH (1992) Systemic release of chemical signals by herbivore-injured corn. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89(17):8399–8402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vlot AC, Klessig DF, Park SW (2008) Systemic acquired resistance: the elusive signal(s). Curr Opin Plant Biol 11(4):436–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wackers FL, Bezemer TM (2003) Root herbivory induces an aboveground indirect defense. Ecol Lett 2003(6):9–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yan ZG, Wang CZ (2006) Wound-induced green leaf volatiles cause the release of acetylated derivatives and a terpenoid in maize. Phytochemistry 67(1):34–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sameer Dixit
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Akanchha Shukla
    • 2
  • Santosh Kumar Upadhyay
    • 3
  • Praveen Chandra Verma
    • 1
  1. 1.Council of Scientific and Industrial Research—National Botanical Research Institute (CSIR-NBRI)LucknowIndia
  2. 2.Department of BiologyUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  3. 3.Department of BotanyPanjab UniversityChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations