The ‘Coercive Control Framework’: Making Law Work for Women

  • Evan StarkEmail author


The potential efficacy of a new offence of coercive control will be determined by the constellation of factors that surround its implementation. Drawing on experiences with s 76 of the Serious Crime Act 2015 (E&W) in England and Wales and the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018 (Scot), these factors are identified as: a coherent national strategic framework; an articulation of the current dilemma posed to the justice system by policing domestic violence; centralised coordination by justice professionals; activist pressure from advocacy organisations such as Women’s Aid; and exhibitions of political will. I endorse the comprehensive, bespoke offence crafted in Scotland; however, the cases of Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic also illustrate how meaningful reform can be achieved despite narrow or ambiguous statutory language. I conclude by responding to critics of the new offence as ‘more law’, and by clarifying the definition of coercive control and the underlying value commitments.


Domestic abuse offence Coercive control Human rights abuse Law enforcement Social change 


  1. BBC News. (2013, September 20). Bill Walker jailed for 12 months for domestic abuse. Retrieved from
  2. BBC News. (2018, January 24). Paul Playle Jailed for Stalking Wife for Two Years. Retrieved from
  3. Bumiller, K. (l987). Victims in the shadow of the law: A critique of the model of legal protection. Signs, 12(3), 421–439.Google Scholar
  4. Burman, M., & Brooks-Hay, O. (2018). Aligning policy and law? The creation of a domestic abuse offence incorporating coercive control. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 18(1), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chesney-Lynd, M. (2006). Patriarchy, crime, and justice: Feminist criminology in an era of backlash. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 6–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chilton, J. (2013, September 7). Bill Walker: Law change could make him quit. Sky News. Retrieved from
  7. Coker, D. (2001). Crime control and feminist law reform in domestic violence law: A critical review. Buffalo Criminal Law Review, 4(2), 801–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coker, D., & Macquaid, A. (2015). Why opposing hyper-incarceration should be central to the work of the anti-domestic violence movement. Race and Social Justice Law Review, 5(2), 585–618.Google Scholar
  9. Crown Prosecution Service. (2018). Violence Against Women and Girls Report: 2017–18. Retrieved from
  10. Danis, F. (2003). The criminalization of domestic violence: What social workers need to know. Social Work, 48(2), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DasGupta, S. (2003). Safety and Justice for All: Examining the Relationship Between the Women’s Anti-Violence Movement and the Criminal Legal System. Retrieved from
  12. Douglas, H. (2015). Do we need a specific domestic violence offence? Melbourne University Law Review, 39(2), 434–471.Google Scholar
  13. Hamby, S., Finkelhor, D., & Turner, H. (2015). Intervention following family violence: Best practices and helpseeking obstacles in a nationally representative sample of families with children. Psychology of Violence, 5(3), 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Henderson, E. (2016, October 18). Basford man who threatened his partner jailed under new ‘controlling behaviour’ law. Notts TV. Retrieved from
  15. Hester, M. (2006). Making it through the criminal justice system: Attrition and domestic violence. Social Policy and Society, 5(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hester, M., & Westmarland, N. (2006). Domestic violence perpetrators. Criminal Justice Matters, 66(1), 34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Home Office. (2015). Controlling or Coercive Behaviour in an Intimate or Family Relationship: Statutory Guidance Framework. Retrieved from
  18. Kerley, P., & Bates, C. (2016, April 5). The Archers: What effect has the Rob and Helen story had? BBC News Magazine. Retrieved from
  19. Kohn, N. (2012). Elder (in)justice: A critique of the criminalization of elder abuse. American Criminal Law Review, 49(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  20. Maguigan, H. (2003). Wading into professor Schneider’s ‘murky middle ground’ between acceptance and rejection of criminal justice responses to domestic violence. American University Journal of Gender, Policy and the Law, 11(2), 427–446.Google Scholar
  21. Mehrotra, G. R., Kimball, E., & Wahab, S. (2016). The braid that binds us: The impact of neoliberalism, criminalization, and professionalization on domestic violence work. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 31(2), 153–163.Google Scholar
  22. Mills, L. G. (1999). Killing her softly: Intimate abuse and the violence of state intervention. Harvard Law Review, 113(2), 551–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mills, L. G. (2003). Insult to injury: Rethinking our responses to intimate abuse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Padfield, N. (2016). Editorial: Controlling or coercive behaviour in an intimate or family relationship. Criminal Law Review, 3, 149–151.Google Scholar
  25. PF v Bill Walker. (2013, August 23). Retrieved from
  26. PF v Bill Walker. (2013, September 20). Retrieved from
  27. Police Scotland and Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service. (2013). Joint Protocol between Police Scotland and the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service: In Partnership Challenging Domestic Abuse. Retrieved from
  28. Presser, L., & Gaarder, E. (2000). Can restorative justice reduce battering? Some preliminary considerations. Social Justice, 27.1(79), 175–195.Google Scholar
  29. Rennison, C. M., & Welchans S. (2000). Intimate Partner Violence, Bureau of Justice Statistics: Special Report NCJ-178247. Retrieved from
  30. Richie, B. E. (2015). Reimagining the movement to end gender violence: Anti-racism, prison abolition, women of color feminisms, and other radical visions of justice. Miami Race and Social Justice Law Review, 5(2), 257–274.Google Scholar
  31. Rivera, J. (1994). Domestic violence against latinas by latino males: An analysis of race, national origin and gender differentials. Third World Law Journal, 14(2), 231–257.Google Scholar
  32. Schneider, E. (2000). Battered women and feminist law making. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Schneider, N. (2018). The mask of happiness: Unmasking coercive control in intimate relationships. Journal of Psychiatric Practice, 24(1), 48–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scottish Executive. (2003). Preventing Domestic Abuse—A National Strategy. Retrieved from
  35. Sharp-Jeffs, N., Kelly, L., & Klein, R. (2017). Long journeys toward freedom: The relationship between coercive control and space for action—Measurement and emerging evidence. Violence Against Women, 24(2), 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Somers, C. H. (1994). Who stole feminism?. New York, NT: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  37. Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Stark, E. (2018). Coercive control as a framework for responding to male partner abuse in the UK: Opportunities and challenges. In N. Lombard (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of gender and violence. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  39. Stark, E. (2016). Policing partner abuse and the new crime of coercive control in the United Kingdom. Family & Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly, 8(4), 345–353.Google Scholar
  40. Stark, E. (1993). The myth of black violence. Social Work, 38(4), 485–491.Google Scholar
  41. The Guardian. (2013, September 20). Former MSP Bill Walker jailed over violent domestic abuse. Retrieved from
  42. Tolmie, J. (2018). Coercive control: To criminalise or not to criminalise? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 18(1), 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trueman, P. (2018). The Helen Titchener (nee Archer) Rescue Fund. Retrieved from
  44. Walby, S., Towers, J., & Francis, B. (2014). Mainstreaming domestic and gender-based violence into sociology and the criminology of violence. Sociological Review, 62(S2), 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walby, S., & Towers, J. (2017). Measuring violence to end violence: Mainstreaming gender. Journal of Gender-Based Violence, 1(1), 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Walklate, S., Fitz-Gibbon, K., & McCulloch, J. (2017). Is more law the answer? Seeking justice for victims of intimate partner violence. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 18(1), 1–17.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Affairs and AdministrationRutgers UniversityNJUSA

Personalised recommendations