Advertisement

Research on Accident Causing Chains with Bayesian Networks on Waterborne Engineering

  • Junyong WangEmail author
  • Yongrui WenEmail author
Conference paper
  • 5 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 617)

Abstract

The accident mechanism is established to strengthen the safety management and reduce accidents of waterborne transport projects combined with security science. Basing on “2-4” model theory, this mechanism analyzes the influences on the security of waterborne projects construction. The impact factors include personal behaviors, project management and environment. We calculate the probability of each factor with Bayesian network and rank them as they contribute the accident. According to the probability, prevention measure and security management methods can be made to reduce accidents.

Keywords

Waterborne engineering Accident mechanism Bayesian network 

References

  1. 1.
    Fu G, Yin W, Dong J et al (2013) Behavior-based accident causation: the “2-4” model and its safety implications in coal mines. J China Coal Soc 38(7):1123–1129Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reason J, Hollnagel E, Paries JS (2006) Revisiting the “Swiss Cheese” model of accidents. Euro Control Experimental Center, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stroeve SH, Sharpanskykh A, Kirwan B (2011) Agent-based organizational modeling for analysis of safety culture at an air navigation service provider. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:515–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Park H (2011) Man-made disasters: a cross-national analysis. Int Bus Rev 20:466–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hollnagel E (2004) Barriers and accident prevention. Ashgate Publishing Group, Burlington, pp 21–50Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Qureshi ZH (2008) A review of accident modelling approaches for complex critical socio-technical systems. Defence Science and Technology OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 173–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fan Y, Guo Y (2014) Csusal factor analysis of Chinese coal mining accident based on HFACS frame. Disaster Adv 7(4):19–26Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geoff C, Hussein S (1998) A project specific risk management concept. Int J Proj Manage 16(6):353–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Everson (2004) A systems-theoretic approach to safety engineering. In: Monograph of the ESD Symposium, pp 41–44Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.China Waterborne Transport Research InstituteBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations