Advertisement

Research on Public Transit Priority Level and Travel Cooperation Level

  • Chengming ZhuEmail author
  • Zhenhua MouEmail author
  • Changxi Ma
  • Yugang Wang
Conference paper
  • 12 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 617)

Abstract

Public transit priority strategy is a key measure for alleviating urban traffic congestion problem, but there are few researches on public transit priority level. The connotation of public transit priority level is analyzed. Public transit priority level includes travel time priority level, travel expense priority level, travel comfort priority level and comprehensive priority level. Public transit travel time priority level is analyzed at different travel distance, different public transit carrying speed and car travel speed. Questionnaire survey based on traveler’s acceptance is conducted. The relationship between travel cooperation level and travel time priority level, travel expense priority level, travel comfort priority level is obtained. The results shows that the key of improving travel cooperation level is to moderately increase car travel expense, increase public transit travel time priority as far as possible and increase public transit travel comfort as far as possible.

Keywords

Public transit Priority level Acceptability Travel cooperation level 

References

  1. 1.
    Eriksson L, Friman M, Garling T (2013) Perceived attributes of bus and car mediating satisfaction with the work commute. Transp Res Part A 47:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shirmohammadli A, Louen C, Vallée D (2016) Exploring mobility equity in a society undergoing changes in travel behavior: a case study of Aachen, Germany. Transp Policy 46:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farber S, Ritter B, Fu LW (2016) Space–time mismatch between transit service and observed travel patterns in the Wasatch Front, Utah: a social equity perspective. Travel Behav Soc 4:40–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller P et al (2016) Analyzing the sustainability performance of public transit. Transp Res Part D 44:177–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Morton C, Caulfield B, Anable J (2016) Customer perceptions of quality of service in public transport: Evidence for bus transit in Scotland. Case Stud Transp Policy 4:199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chakrabarti S (2017) How can public transit get people out of their cars? An analysis of transit mode choice for commute trips in Los Angeles. Transp Policy 54:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verbich D, El-Geneidy A (2017) Public transit fare structure and social vulnerability in Montreal, Canada. Transp Res Part A 96:43–53Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang ZL, Zhao B, Tian QF (2012) Resident trip mode structure and social benefit maximization based on transit priority. J Highw Transp Res Dev 29(8):127–131Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karner A (2018) Assessing public transit service equity using route-level accessibility measures and public data. J Transp Geogr 67:24–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stiglic M et al (2018) Enhancing urban mobility: integrating ride-sharing and public transit. Comput Oper Res 90:12–21MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lierop DV, El-Geneidy A (2016) Enjoying loyalty: the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit. Res Transp Econ 59:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun YX et al (2016) Implications of the cost of public funds in public transit subsidization and regulation. Transp Res Part A 91:236–250Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhao B (2011) Synergetic relation between resident trip mode choice and transit priority. Jilin University, Chang ChunGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhuo J (2013) Misunderstandings on the prioritization of public transit development. Int Urban Plann 28(3):51–52Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zuo ZY, Yang GC, Shao CF (2012) Modeling modal shift of car travelers to buses based on public transport priority. J Transp Syst Eng Inf Technol 12(1):124–129Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang LP (2014) The model of commute mode shift from private car to public transport. Beijing Jiaotong University, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Energy Science and EngineeringHenan Polytechnic UniversityJiaozuo CityChina
  2. 2.Beijing Key Laboratory of Traffic EngineeringBeijingChina
  3. 3.Shandong Jianzhu UniversityLicheng District, JinanChina
  4. 4.School of Traffic and TransportationLanzhou Jiaotong UniversityLanzhouChina

Personalised recommendations