Advertisement

Research on the Choice of Shared Car Travel Behavior Based on Medium Commuting Distance

  • Yongneng Xu
  • Xiaotian WangEmail author
  • Zhou He
Conference paper
  • 18 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 617)

Abstract

With the rapid development of urbanization level, the choice of urban residents to travel under medium commuting distance has a great impact on urban traffic congestion and environmental pollution. Shared car travel modes can alleviate traffic pressure. This paper takes the travel choice behavior of residents under the medium commuting distance as the research object. Through the t-test to the age, the number of private cars, whether there is car rental experience, travel expenses and travel time as the influencing factors. Multivariate Logit selection probability model of the traveler’s choice of private car, shared car, taxi and net car is established. The SPSS software is used to calibrate and test the model parameters by using the maximum likelihood estimation method to obtain the travel mode selection probability, which provides a reference for the development of shared car mode.

Keywords

Medium commute distance Shared car Multivariate Logit model SPSS software 

References

  1. 1.
    Kearney “互联网 + 智能交通”市场进入发展黄金期. 上海汽车, 2018(1):61–62Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    石飞, 陆振波. 出行距离分布模型及参数研究. 交通运输工程学报, 2008, 8(2):110–115Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    陈征, 刘英舜, 石飞. 城市居民出行方式距离曲线的研究与应用. 交通运输研究, 2006(8):157–160Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    荣萍, 罗 Open image in new window 辰. 引领汽车产业新趋势——EVCARD电动汽车分时租赁助力“智慧交通”建设. 中国高新区, 2016(17):146–150Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    程苑. 汽车共享下的城市交通出行方式博弈研究. 哈尔滨工业大学, 2015Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    代秋杰.基于消费者选择行为的汽车共享政策分析. 长春理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2012, 25(11):106–107 + 120Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim J, Rasouli S, Timmermans H (2017) Satisfaction and uncertainty in car-sharing decisions: an integration of hybrid choice and random regret-based models. Transp Res Part A 95:13–33Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    刘珺. 汽车共享出行模式选择的演化博弈研究. 南京大学, 2017Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    兰静, 诸大建. 可持续交通消费的接受和使用行为研究——基于上海市汽车共享的调查. 中国人口资源与环境, 2016, 26(11):98–105Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    张明, 刘菁. 适合中国城市特征的TOD规划设计原则. 城市规划学刊, 2007(1):91–96Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    韩晓玉, 朱从坤, 何承韡,等. Logit模型在轨道交通接驳方式预测中的应用. 交通科技与经济, 2016, 18(1):25–29Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    郭彧鑫. 基于出行链的轨道交通衔接方式研究[D]. 北京建筑大学, 2015Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    景鹏, 隽志才, 查奇芬. 考虑心理潜变量的出行方式选择行为模型. 中国公路学报, 2014, 27(11):84–92Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    朱顺应, 邓爽, 王红,等. 具有模糊特性变量的出行方式预测Logit模型. 交通运输工程学报, 2013, 13(3):71–78Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    杨励雅, 邵春福, HAGHANI A. 出行方式与出发时间联合选择的分层Logit模型. 交通运输工程学报, 2012, 12(2):76–83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nanjing University of Science and TechnologyTransport EngineeringNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations