Advertisement

An Embodied View of Linguaculture

  • Joseph ShaulesEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter explores the relationship between language, culture, and cognition. It looks at contrasting ways to conceptualize linguistic meaning: (1) linguistic meaning as symbols or labels that reflect universal cognitive processes and (2) the idea that language reflects meaning particular to different cultural communities. It discusses insights from neurolinguistics, which reveal that linguistic meaning is not localized in a single place in the brain, and that the meaning of individual words is spread through regions of the brain responsible for different semantic categories. This implies that learning a foreign language requires more than new labels to attach to existing thoughts or concepts. It introduces embodied simulation theory, which hypothesizes that linguistic meaning is not primarily a manipulation of symbols, but an embodied re-creation of lived experience. From the perspective of embodied simulation theory, linguistic meaning is grounded in experience and thus rooted in the shared experience of cultural communities. In short, linguistic meaning is cultural by its very nature.

References

  1. Agar, Michael. 1994. Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: Perennial.Google Scholar
  2. Andric, Michael, and Steven L. Small. 2015. fMRI methods for studying the neurobiology of language under naturalistic conditions. In Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use, ed. Roel M. Willems. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, Milton J. 1993. Towards ethnorelativism: A developmental model of intercultural sensitivity. In Education for the intercultural experience, ed. Michael R. Paige, 21–71. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, Milton J. 1998. Overcoming the golden rule: Sympathy and empathy. In Basic concepts of intercultural communication, ed. Milton J. Bennett, 272. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, Milton J. 2013. Basic concepts of intercultural communication: Paradigms, principles and practices, 2nd ed. Boston: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bergen, Benjamin. 2005. Mental simulation in literal and figurative language understanding. In The literal and nonliteral in language and thought, ed. Seana Coulson and Barbara Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, 255–280. Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  7. Bergen, Benjamin K. 2012. Louder than words: The new science of how the mind makes meaning. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  9. D’Andrade, Roy. 1995. The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Vega, Manuel. 2015. Toward an embodied approach to inferences in comprehension: The case of action language. In Inferences during reading, ed. Edward J. O’Brien, Anne E. Cook, and Robert F. Lorch, Jr. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Evans, Vyvyan. 2009. How words mean: Lexical concepts, cognitive models, and meaning construction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evans, Vyvyan. 2015. The crucible of language: How language and mind create meaning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. 2006. Cognitive linguistics: An introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fantini, Alvino. 1997. Language: Its cultural and intercultural dimensions. In New ways in teaching culture, 3–15. Alexandria, VA.Google Scholar
  15. Fantini, Alvino. 2001. Exploring intercultural competence: A construct proposal. Paper presented at the national council of organizations of less commonly taught languages—fourth annual conference, Foreign Service Institute, National Foreign Affairs Training Center, Arlington Virginia.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, Edward L. 2013. No drama, King Obama. Aeon.Google Scholar
  17. Gardenfors, Peter. 2014. The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibbs, Raymond W. 2006. Metaphor interpretation as embodied simulation. Mind and Language 21 (3): 434–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibbs, Raymond W. 2013. Walking the walk while thinking about the talk: Embodied interpretation of metaphorical narratives. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42 (4): 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gibbs, Raymond W., and Marcus Perlman. 2010. Language understanding is grounded in experiential simulations: A response to Weiskopf. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (3): 305–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hiraga, Masako K. 2005. Metaphor and iconicity: A cognitive approach to analysing texts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huth, Alexander G., Wendy A. de Heer, Thomas L. Griffiths, Frédéric E. Theunissen, and Jack L. Gallant. 2016. Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature 532: 453.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17637, https://www.nature.com/articles/nature17637#supplementary-information.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kemmerer, David. 2015. Cognitive neuroscience of language. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Luna, David, Torsten Ringberg, and Laura A. Peracchio. 2008. One individual, two identities: Frame switching among biculturals. Journal of Consumer Research 35 (August).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maldarelli, Claire. 2016. A 3D map of the brain shows how we understand language. Popular Science.Google Scholar
  27. Marian, Viorica, and Ulric Neisser. 2000. Language-dependent recall of autobiographical memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129 (3): 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oller, John W. 1991. A theory of intelligence as semiosis: With a couple of comments on interlanguage development. In Language, culture & cognition, ed. Lilliam M. Malave and Georges Duquette. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  29. Pecher, Diane, and Rolf A. Zwaan. 2005. Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language and thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pinker, Steven. 1995. The language instinct. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  31. Pinker, Steven. 2007. The stuff of thought. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  32. Shaules, Joseph. 2007. Deep culture: The hidden challenges of global living. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaules, Joseph. 2010. Beneath the surface: A beginner’s guide to the deep culture experience. Boston, MA: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
  34. Strauss, Claudia, and Naomi Quinn. 1997. A cognitive theory of cultural meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Stryker, Sheldon. 1980. Symbolic interactionism. Caldwell, NJ: The Blackburn Press.Google Scholar
  36. Trompenaars, F., and C. Hampden-Turner. 1998. Riding the waves of culture. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  37. Weiskopf, Daniel. 2010. Embodied cognition and linguistic comprehension. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41 (3): 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Willems, Roel M. 2015. Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Japan Intercultural InstituteTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations