Advertisement

Contribution of Optimal Equipment for ELV Recycling to the Sustainable Development of Serbia and the Region

  • M. PavlovićEmail author
  • D. Tadić
  • A. Aleksić
  • N. Komatina
  • B. H. Hosam
Chapter
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

The “3R” (reduce, reuse and recycle) principle has been significantly employed in processing ELVs (end-of-life vehicles), particularly ELV parts and methods to promote sustainable development. Motivated by legislation such as Directive (2000/53/EC), recently, ELV problems have seriously been treated in developing countries as well. This paper analyses the impact of newly developed equipment for ELV recycling on the sustainable development of the Republic of Serbia through environmental protection, resource exploitation and socio-economic factors. Research is carried out on the national and regional level. The proposed research and analysis show the significant contribution of newly developed equipment on the sustainable development of the Republic of Serbia and the region.

Keywords

Sustainable development ELV recycling 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Research presented in this paper was supported by Ministry of Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia, Grant TR 35033.

References

  1. Arsovski, S., Putnik, G., Arsovski, Z., Tadic, D., Aleksic, A., Djordjevic, A., et al. (2015). Modelling and enhancement of organizational resilience potential in process industry SMEs. Sustainability, 7(12), 16483–16497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagheri, A., & Hjorth, P. (2007). Planning for sustainable development: a paradigm shift towards a process-based approach. Sustanable Development, 15, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., & Brown, C. (2011). The social dimension of sustainable development: defining urban social sustainability. Sustainable Development, 19, 289–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005). Sustainable development: mapping different approaches. Sustainable Development, 13, 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Milivojević, J., Grubor, S., Kokić-Arsić, A., Đokić, S., Tonić, N. (2011). Reciklaža motornih vozila na kraju životnog ciklusa u funkciji kvaliteta života, 38. Nacionalna konferencija o kvalitetu, Fakultet inženjerskih nauka, Univerzitet u Kragujevcu.Google Scholar
  6. Nikolić, M., Vulić, M., Pavlović, M., Desnica, E. (2017). Benchmarking of technologies of baling presses machines in the elv recycling process. In: VII International Conference Industrial Engineering and Environmental Protection 2017 (IIZS 2017), 12–13 Oct 2017, Zrenjanin, SerbiaGoogle Scholar
  7. Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2005). The theory of the knowledge-creating firm: subjectivity, objectivity and synthesis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(3), 419–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pavlović, A., Tadić, D., Arsovski, S., Jevtić, D., & Pavlović, M. (2016). Evaluation and choosing of recycling technologies by using FAHP. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 13(7), 143–157.Google Scholar
  9. Saaty, T. (1990). How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal Operational Research, 48(1), 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Pavlović
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. Tadić
    • 2
  • A. Aleksić
    • 2
  • N. Komatina
    • 2
  • B. H. Hosam
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Engineering ManagementUniversity Business AcademyNovi SadSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of KragujevacKragujevacSerbia
  3. 3.Rejto Sandor Faculty of Light Industry and Environmental Protection EngineeringObuda UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations