Advertisement

Disability Studies: The Context

  • Sailaja Chennat
Chapter
  • 50 Downloads

Abstract

This introductory chapter situates the contents of the book in the discipline of Disability Studies. Disability Studies is introduced as an interdisciplinary discipline with socio-political, economic, historic, socio-cultural and psychological perspectives built into it. Also, sketching how the discipline of Disability Studies has been evolving to become more inclusive in theorizations and sociological analyses, the inclusions of feminist studies, cultural studies, gerontology and transgender studies have been presented. The social model of disability has been presented with both its strengths and criticism. Examining with the lens of social model, oppression and exclusion are described as the causes for the problems faced by the disabled people, not their impairments. Ongoing debates surrounding inclusive education, the deliberations concerning where and under what conditions students with disabilities should be educated, have been discussed as the central and one of the most contentious issues in Disability Studies. To give a complete picture, global and national initiatives for the welfare of persons with disability in terms of state policies and acts have been discussed.

Keywords

Interdisciplinarity Multiple perspectives Social model Barrier free environment Inclusivity Critical Disability Studies (CDS) Transgender studies Gerontology Technology for disabled Disability inclusion 

References

  1. Baglieri, S., Valle, J. W., Connor, D. J., & Gallagher, D. J. (2011). Disability studies in education: The need for a plurality of perspectives on disability. Remedial and Special Education, 32(4), 267–278. Retrieved in September, 2018 from  https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510362200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton, L. (2000). Disability studies and the quest for inclusivity: Some observations. Retrieved in October, 2018 from http://www.revistaeducacion.mec.es/re349/re349_07ing.pdf
  3. Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. (1994). The social meaning of mental retardation: Two life stories. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chennat, S., & Lakhyani, S. (Eds.). (2018). Redefining disability through art. Delhi: Global Books.Google Scholar
  5. Crow, L. (1992). Renewing the social model of disability. Coalition, July: 5–9, 7.Google Scholar
  6. Goodley, D. (2011). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Karna, G. N. (2016). Editor’s note. International Journal of Disability Studies, 10(1–2), 5–10.Google Scholar
  8. Kumar, P., & Agarwal, P. (2016). Inclusive education in India: Concern and policy perspective. International Journal of Research in Humanities, Arts and Literature, 4(1), 77–88.Google Scholar
  9. Linton, S., & Bérubé, M. (1998). Claiming disability: Knowledge and identity (pp. 20–21). New York: NYU Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt9qfx5w.Google Scholar
  10. Meekosha, H., & Shuttleworth, R. (2017). What’s so critical about critical disability studies? In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (pp. 175–178). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Mog, A. (2008). Threads of commonality in transgender and disability studies. Disability Studies Quarterly, 28(4). Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/152/152.
  12. Oliver, M. (2004). The social model in action: If I had a hammer. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research. Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar
  13. Priestley, M., & Rabiee, P. (2001). Building Bridges: Disability and old age (ESRC Research Report R000223581). Leeds: Leeds University Press. Retrieved from https://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/40/2011/10/bridgesreport.pdf.Google Scholar
  14. Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Thomas, C. (2004). Developing the social relational in the social model of disability: A theoretical agenda. In C. Barnes & G. Mercer (Eds.), Implementing the social model of disability: Theory and research. Leeds: The Disability Press.Google Scholar

Government Reports

    UN Reports

    1. United Nations. (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. General Assembly Resolution 217, A (III), U.N. Doc. A/810. Retrieved in September, 2018 from http://www.unhcrh.ch/udhr/index.htm
    2. United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. United Nations General Assembly Session 61 Resolution 106, A/RES/61/106
    3. United Nations. (2019). Ageing and disability. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/disability-and-ageing.html
    4. UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Madrid: UNESCO/Ministry of Education and Science.Google Scholar
    5. The UN Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities. (1993). Retrieved in January 2019 from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/standard-rules-on-the-equalization-of-opportunities-for-persons-with-disabilities.html
    6. World Programme of Action Concerning Disabled Persons. Retrieved in January 2019 from https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/resources/world-programme-of-action-concerning-disabled-persons.html
    7. World Declaration on Education for All. (1990). Retrieved in January 2019 from http://www.unesco.org/education/pdf/JOMTIE_E.PDF
    8. World Education Forum for Action. (2000). Retrieved in February 2019 from https://www.un.org/press/en/2000/20000411.soc4543.doc.html
    9. Education for All (flagship): Right to Education for Persons with Disabilities. (2001). Retrieved in March 2019 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000137873

    World Bank

    1. World Bank. (2017). Education: Children with disabilities are being left behind. World Bank and Global Partnership for Education (GPE) Report. Retrieved in September 2018 from https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2017/12/01

    Government of India

    1. Education Commission. (1966). Education and national development. New Delhi: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
    2. Government of India. (1995). The persons with disabilities (Equal opportunities, protection of rights and full participation) act. New Delhi: Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, January 1, 1996.Google Scholar
    3. Government of India. (2016). Rights of persons with disabilities act. New Delhi: Ministry of Law, Justice and Company Affairs, December 27, 2016.Google Scholar
    4. Ministry of Human Resource Development. (1986). National policy of education. New Delhi: Government of India.Google Scholar
    5. National Education Policy. (1968). Retrieved in March 2019 from https://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/document-reports/NPE-1968.pdf
    6. National Policy for Persons with Disability. (2006). Retrieved in January 2019 from http://www.disabilityaffairs.gov.in/content/page/acts.php
    7. Programme of Action. (1992). (POA) (MHRD). Retrieved in February 2019 from https://mhrd.gov.in/programme-action-1992
    8. Rehabilitation Council of India Act. (1992). Retrieved in March 2019 from https://indiacode.nic.in/bitstream/123456789/1977/1/199234.pdf
    9. Sergeant Report on Education. (1944). Retrieved in March 2019 from http://www.allresearchjournal.com/archives/2015/vol1issue2/PartC/1-7-150.pdf
    10. The Mental Health Act. (1987). Retrieved in March 2019 from https://mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/2077435281432724989_0_0.pdf
    11. The right of children to free and compulsory education (RTE) act (2009). New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resource Development.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sailaja Chennat
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of DelhiDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations