Advertisement

Structural Health Monitoring of Periodic Infrastructure: A Review and Discussion

  • Junfang Wang
  • Jian-Fu LinEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Periodic structure has obtained wide applications in various infrastructures. The structural health monitoring of periodic infrastructures is motivated by the facts that in-service infrastructures are damage-prone, while traditional inspection and nondestructive evolution hardly meet the requirements in continuous surveillance, timely warning and assessment of anomalies, and cost-effective maintenance. In this chapter, the fundamental principles and applications of the periodic structure are first introduced. Then, the recent research activities on the health monitoring of periodic infrastructures using data mining are summarized. It is followed by a review of instantaneous baseline structural health monitoring that was originally presented for diminishing the vulnerability of anomaly detection performance to environmental and operational conditions. Investigations on structural health monitoring using the inherent property of periodic structure are subsequently reviewed, and none of them incorporates both instantaneous baseline and advanced data mining techniques for the anomaly identification oriented classification, prediction, and optimization. Based on the state-of-the-art review, discussions about current investigations and suggestions for future studies are provided in the final section.

Keywords

Structural health monitoring Damage detection Periodic structure Instantaneous baseline Data mining 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial supports from China Earthquake Administration’s Science for Earthquake Resilience Project (No. XH204702) and the Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Plan Project (No. 2018B020207011).

References

  1. 1.
    LMC Steel Buildings Homepage. http://lmcsteel.com/warranty-information/steel_framework2. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
  2. 2.
    HighestBridges.com Homepage. http://highestbridges.com/wiki/index.php?title=China_2012_Bridge_Trip. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
  3. 3.
    JSCE Homepage. http://www.jsce-int.org/a_t/achievement/civil/2011. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
  4. 4.
    DPrint.com Homepage. http://lmcsteel.com/warranty-information/steel_framework2/. Accessed 30 Apr 2019
  5. 5.
    Friis, L., Ohlrich, M.: Coupling of flexural and longitudinal wave motion in a periodic structure with asymmetrically arranged transverse beams. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118, 3010–3020 (2005)ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mead, D.J.: Wave propagation and natural modes in periodic systems: I. Mono-coupled systems. J. Sound Vib. 40, 1–18 (1975)ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mead, D.J.: Wave propagation and natural modes in periodic systems: II. Multi-coupled systems, with and without damping. J. Sound Vib. 40, 19–39 (1975)ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yun, Y., Mak, C.M.: A study of coupled flexural-longitudinal wave motion in a periodic dual-beam structure with transverse connection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 126(1), 114–121 (2009)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, X., Mak, C.M.: Acoustic performance of a duct loaded with identical resonators. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 131(4), 316–322 (2012)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, J.F., Mak, C.M., Yun, Y.: A methodology for direct identification of characteristic wave-types in a finite periodic dual-layer structure with transverse connection. J. Vib. Control 18(9), 1406–1414 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin, T.R.: A study of modal characteristics and the control mechanism of finite periodic and irregular ribbed plates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 123, 729–737 (2008)ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brillouin, L.: Wave Propagation in Periodic Structures. Dover Publications, New York (1953)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Umezawa, H.: Advanced Field Theory: Micro, Macro, and Thermal Physics. American Institute of Physics, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Duhamel, D., Mace, B.R., Brennan, M.J.: Finite element analysis of the vibrations of waveguides and periodic structures. J. Sound Vib. 294, 205–220 (2006)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maess, M., Wagner, N., Gaul, L.: Dispersion curves of fluid filled elastic pipes by standard FE models and eigenpath analysis. J. Sound Vib. 296, 264–276 (2006)ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mencik, J.M., Ichchou, M.: Wave finite elements in guided elastodynamics with internal fluid. Int. J. Solids Struct. 44, 2148–2167 (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manconi, E., Mace, B.R.: Wave characterization of cylindrical and curved panels using a finite element method. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 125, 154–163 (2009)ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Waki, Y., Mace, B.R., Brennan, M.J.: Numerical issues concerning the wave and finite element method for free and forced vibrations of waveguides. J. Sound Vib. 327, 92–108 (2009)ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Søe-Knudsen, A., Sorokin, S.V.: Analysis of linear elastic wave propagation in piping systems by a combination of the boundary integral equations method and the finite element method. Contin. Mech. Thermodyn. 22, 647–662 (2010)ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Renno, J.M., Mace, B.R.: Calculation of reflection and transmission coefficients of joints using a hybrid finite element/wave and finite element approach. J. Sound Vib. 332, 2149–2164 (2013)ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Renno, J.M., Mace, B.R.: Vibration modelling of structural networks using a hybrid finite element/wave and finite element approach. Wave Motion 51(4), 566–580 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mace, B.R., Jones, R.W., Harland, N.R.: Wave transmission through structure inserts. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109, 1417–1421 (2001)ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sigmund, O., Jensen, J.S.: Systematic design of phononic band-gap materials and structures by topology optimization. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 361(1806), 1001–1019 (2003)ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hussein, M.I., Hulbert, G.M., Scott, R.A.: Dispersive elastodynamics of 1D banded materials and structures: design. J. Sound Vib. 307(3–5), 865–893 (2007)ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Szefi, J.T.: Helicopter gearbox isolation using periodically layered fluidic isolators, Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, USA (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yilmaz, C., Kikuchi, N.: Analysis and design of passive band-stop filter-type vibration isolators for low-frequency applications. J. Sound Vib. 291(3–5), 1004–1028 (2006)ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Asiri, S.: Tunable mechanical filter for longitudinal vibrations. Shock Vib. 14(5), 377–391 (2007)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jung, W., Gu, Z., Baz, A.: Mechanical filtering characteristics of passive periodic engine mount. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 46(9), 685–697 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang, J.F., Mak, C.M.: Adaptive-passive vibration isolation between nonrigid machines and nonrigid foundations using a dual-beam periodic structure with shape memory alloy transverse connection. J. Sound Vib. 333(23), 6005–6023 (2014)ADSGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chimenti, D.E.: Guided waves in plates and their use in materials characterization. Appl. Mech. Rev. 50(5), 247–284 (1997)ADSGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Achenbach, J.D.: Quantitative nondestructive evaluation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 37, 13–27 (2000)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rose, J.L.: Guided wave nuances for ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 47(3), 575–583 (2000)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chang, F.K.: Introduction to health monitoring: context, problems, solutions. In: Proceedings of the 3rd European Pre-workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Paris, France (2002)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ni, Y.Q., Xia, Y., Liao, W.Y., Ko, J.M.: Technology innovation in developing the structural health monitoring system for Guangzhou New TV tower. Struct. Control Health Monit. 16(1), 73–98 (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mufti, A.A.: Structural health monitoring of innovative Canadian civil structures. Struct. Health Monit. 1(1), 89–103 (2002)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ou, J.P.: Research and practice of intelligent heath monitoring systems for civil infrastructures in Main China. In: Proceedings of Third China-Japan-US Symposium on Structural Health Monitoring and Control and Fourth Chinese National Conference on Structural Control, Dalian, China (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fayyad, U.M., et al.: Advance in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. MIT Press, Mento Park (1996)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Duan, Z., Zhang, K.: Data mining technology for structural health monitoring. Pac. Sci. Rev. 8, 27–36 (2006)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gordan, M., Razak, H.A., Ismail, Z., Ghaedi, K.: Recent developments in damage identification of structures using data mining. Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 14(13), 2373–2401 (2017)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Hung, S., Huang, C.S., Wen, C.M., Hsu, Y.C.: Nonparametric identification of a building structure from experimental data using wavelet neural network. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 18, 356–368 (2003)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ni, Y.Q., Wang, J.F., Chan, T.H.T.: Structural damage alarming and localization of cable-supported bridges using multi-novelty indices: a feasibility study. Struct. Eng. Mech. Int. J. 54(2), 337–362 (2015)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Padil, K.H., Bakhary, N., Hao, H.: The use of a non-probabilistic artificial neural network to consider uncertainties in vibration-based-damage detection. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 83, 194–209 (2017)ADSGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Abayomi, M.A., David, O.O.: Fuzzy control model for structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure systems. J. Control Sci. Eng. 1, 9–20 (2015)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jiao, Y., Liu, H., Cheng, Y., Gong, Y.: Damage identification of bridge based on Chebyshev polynomial fitting and fuzzy logic without considering baseline model parameters. Shock Vib. 2015, 1–10 (2015)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jhonatan, C.N., Magda, R., Rodolfo, V., Luis, M., Jabid, Q.: Features of cross-correlation analysis in a data-driven approach for structural damage assessment. Sensors 18(5), 1571 (2018)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zucconi, M., Sorrentino, L., Ferlito, R.: Principal component analysis for a seismic usability model of unreinforced masonry buildings. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 96, 64–75 (2017)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Krishnan, M., Bhowmik, B., Hazra, B., Pakrashi, V.: Real time damage detection using recursive principal components and time varying auto-regressive modeling. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 101, 549–574 (2018)ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Mita, A., Haqiwara, H.: Damage diagnosis of a building structure using support vector machine and modal frequency patterns. Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 5057, 118–125 (2003)ADSGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chong, J.W., Kim, Y., Chon, K.H.: Nonlinear multiclass support vector machine-based health monitoring system for buildings employing magnetorheological dampers. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 25, 1456–1468 (2013)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Huang, Y., Shao, C.S, Wu, B., Beck, J.L., Li, H.: State-of-the-art review on Bayesian inference in structural system identification and damage assessment. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2(6) (2019)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Yin, T., Jiang, Q., Yuen, K.: Vibration-based damage detection for structural connections using incomplete modal data by Bayesian approach and model reduction technique. Eng. Struct. 132, 260–277 (2017)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Panigrahi, S.K., Chakraverty, S., Mishra, B.K.: damage identification of multistory shear structure from sparse modal information. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 27, 1–9 (2013)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Guilherme, F.G., Sebastião, S.C., Antonio, C.A.: Damage detection in aeronautical profile by using frequency changes and optimization algorithms. J. Comput. Sci. 7(2), 29–43 (2016)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Ranginkaman, M.H., Haghighi, A., Vali Samani, H.M.: Inverse frequency response analysis for pipelines leak detection using the particle swarm optimization. Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng. 6, 1–12 (2016)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Majumdar, A., Kumar, D., Maity, D.: Damage assessment of truss structures from changes in natural frequencies using ant colony optimization. Appl. Math. Comput. 218, 9759–9977 (2012)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Arangio, S., Beck, J.L.: Bayesian neural networks for bridge integrity assessment. Struct. Control Health Monit. 19, 3–21 (2012)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Yin, T., Zhu, H.P.: Probabilistic damage detection of a steel truss bridge model by optimally designed bayesian neural network. Sensors 18(10), 3371 (2018)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Adeli, H., Jiang, X.: Dynamic fuzzy wavelet neural network model for structural system identification. J. Struct. Eng. 132(1), 102–111 (2006)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Jiang, X., Mahadevan, S., Adeli, H.: Bayesian wavelet packet denoising for structural system identification. Struct. Control Health Monit. 14, 333–356 (2007)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhou, H.F., Ni, Y.Q., Ko, J.M.: Eliminating temperature effect in vibration-based structural damage detection. J. Eng. Mech. 137, 785–797 (2011)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M.A.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington, MA 01803, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Alhajj, R., Gao, H., Li, X., Li, J., Zaiane, O.R.: Advanced data mining and applications. In: 3rd International Conference on Advanced Data Mining and Applications (ADMA), Reda, Harbin, China (2007)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Ko, J.M., Chak, K.K., Wang, J.Y., Ni, Y.Q., Chan, T.H.T.: Formulation of an uncertainty model relating modal parameters and environmental factors by using long-term monitoring data. In: Proceeding of Smart Structures and Materials 2003: Smart Systems and Nondestructive Evaluation for Civil Infrastructures. International Society for Optical Engineering, San Diego, California, United States (2003)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Sohn, H., Worden, K., Farrar, C.R.: Consideration of environmental and operational variability for damage diagnosis. In: Proceedings of SPIE: The International Society for Optical Engineering, Smart Structures and Materials 2002: Smart Systems for Bridges, Structures, and Highways, vol. 4696, pp. 100–111. Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, WA (2002)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Oh, C.K., Sohn, H., Bae, I.H.: Statistical novelty detection within the Yeongjong suspension bridge under environmental and operational variations. Smart Mater. Struct. 18(12), 125022 (2009)ADSGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Hsu, T.Y., Loh, C.H.: Damage detection accommodating nonlinear environmental effects by nonlinear principal component analysis. Struct. Control Health Monit. 17(3), 338–354 (2009)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Reynders, E., Wursten, G., De Roeck, G.: Output-only structural health monitoring in changing environmental conditions by means of nonlinear system identification. Struct. Health Monit. 13(1), 82–93 (2014)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Park, H.W., Sohn, H., Law, K.H., Farrar, C.R.: Time reversal active sensing for health monitoring of a composite plate. J. Sound Vib. 302(1–2), 50–66 (2007)ADSGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Kim, S.B., Sohn, H.: Instantaneous reference-free crack detection based on polarization characteristics of piezoelectric materials. Smart Mater. Struct. 16(6), 2375–2387 (2007)ADSGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sohn, H., Kim, S.B.: Development of dual PZT transducers for reference-free crack detection in thin plate structures. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 57(1), 229–240 (2010)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Anton, S.R., Inman, D.J., Park, G.: Reference-free damage detection using instantaneous baseline measurements. AIAA J. 47(8), 1952–1964 (2009)ADSGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Park, S., Anton, S.R., Kim, J.K., et al.: Instantaneous baseline structural damage detection using a miniaturized piezoelectric guided waves system. KSCE J. Civ. Eng. 14(6), 889–895 (2010)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Overly, T.G., Park, G., Farinholt, K.M., Farrar, C.R.: Piezoelectric active-sensor diagnostics and validation using instantaneous baseline data. IEEE Sens. J. 9(11), 1414–1421 (2009)ADSGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Salmanpour, M.S., Khodaei, Z.S., Aliabadi, M.H.: Instantaneous baseline damage localization using sensor mapping. IEEE Sens. J. 17(2), 295–301 (2017)ADSGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ferri Aliabadi, M.H., Sharif Khodaei, Z.: Structural Health Monitoring for Advanced Composite Structures. Computational and Experimental Methods in Structures (Book 8), World Scientific Europe Ltd, London (2018)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Ni, Y.Q., Wang, J.F., Xie, Q.L., Lam, K.C.: A fiber Bragg grating sensing network for structural integrity monitoring of underground water pipes: analysis of monitoring data. In: The 5th International Forum on Opto-electronic Sensor-based Monitoring in Geo-engineering, Nanjing, China (2014)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Xu, C.: Health condition assessment of underground water pipe monitored by fibre Bragg sensory system. The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Dissertations, Hong Kong (2016). https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/9064
  78. 78.
    Peng, Z.K., Lang, Z.Q., Chu, F.L., Meng, G.: Locating nonlinear components in periodic structures using nonlinear effects. Struct. Health Monit. 9(5), 401–411 (2010)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Cheng, C.M., Peng, Z.K., Dong, X.J., Zhang, W.M., Meng, G.: Locating non-linear components in two dimensional periodic structures based on NOFRFs. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech. 67, 198–208 (2014)ADSGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Zhao, J., Tang, J., Wang, K.W.: Anomaly amplification for damage detection of periodic structures via piezoelectric transducer networking. Smart Mater. Struct. 20(10), 105006 (2011)ADSGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Zhao, J., Tang, J.: Amplifying damage signature in periodic structures using enhanced piezoelectric networking with negative resistance elements. J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct. 24(13), 1613–1625 (2013)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Zhu, H., Wu, M.: The characteristic receptance method for damage detection in large mono-coupled periodic structures. J. Sound Vib. 251(2), 241–259 (2002)ADSGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Zhu, H.P., Xu, Y.L.: Damage detection of mono-coupled periodic structures based on sensitivity analysis of modal parameters. J. Sound Vib. 285(1–2), 365–390 (2005)ADSGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Yin, T., Zhu, H.P., Fu, S.J.: Damage identification of periodically-supported structures following the Bayesian probabilistic approach. Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn. 19(1), 1940011 (2019)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Yin, T., Wang, X.Y., Zhu, H.P.: A probabilistic approach for the detection of bolt loosening in periodically supported structures endowed with bolted flange joints. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 128, 588–616 (2019)ADSGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Yin, T., Yuen, K.V., Lam, H.F., Zhu, H.P.: Entropy-based optimal sensor placement for model identification of periodic structures endowed with bolted joints. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 32(12), 1007–1024 (2017)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Lin, J.F., Xu, Y.L.: Two-stage covariance-based multisensing damage detection method. J. Eng. Mech. B4016003 (2017)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Lin, J.F., Xu, Y.L.: Response covariance-based sensor placement for structural damage detection. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 14(9), 1207–1220 (2018)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Lin, J.F., Xu, Y.L., Law, S.S.: Structural damage detection-oriented multi-type sensor placement with multi-objective optimization. J. Sound Vib. 422, 1–22 (2018)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Lin, J.F., Xu, Y.L., Zhan, S.: Experimental investigation on multi-objective multi-type sensor optimal placement for structural damage detection. Struct. Health Monit. Int. J. 18(3), 882–901 (2019)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Xu, Y.L., Lin, J.F., Zhan, S., F.Y. Wang: Multi-stage damage detection of a transmission tower: Numerical investigation and experimental validation. Struct. Control Health Monit. e2366 (2019)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Wang, P.F., Youn, B.D., Hu, C.: A generic probabilistic framework for structural health prognostics and uncertainty management. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 28, 622–637 (2012)ADSGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Hu, C., Youn, B.D., Wang, P., Yoon, J.T.: Ensemble of data-driven prognostic algorithms for robust prediction of remaining useful life. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 103, 120–135 (2012)Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Wang, J.F., Liu, X.Z., Ni, Y.Q.: A Bayesian probabilistic approach for acoustic emission-based rail condition assessment. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 33(1), 21–34 (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung Hom, KowloonChina
  2. 2.Center of Safety Monitoring of Engineering StructuresShenzhen Academy of Disaster Prevention and ReductionShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations