Advertisement

Breast Cancer and Mammographic Anomalies

  • Vikrant BhatejaEmail author
  • Mukul Misra
  • Shabana Urooj
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 861)

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the common globally detected cancers, affecting each year an average of 1.4 million women. It has caused a toll of 1 in 8 out of all cancer-related deaths especially among women under the age of 50. It scores to be the second leading cause of deaths in country as well as other parts of the world (lungs and skin cancer being the major cause of mortality).

References

  1. O. Arnav, J. Friexenet, J. Marti, E. Pérez, J. Pont, E.R. Denton, R. Zwiggelaar, A review of automatic mass detection and segmentation in mammographic images. Med. Image Anal. 14(2), 87–110 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. J.R. Benson, G.P.H. Gui, T. Tuttle (eds.), Early breast cancer: From screening to Multidisciplinary management, 3rd edn (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2013Google Scholar
  3. S.E. Brooks, T.M. Hembree, B.J. Shelton, S.C. Beache, G. Aschbacher, P.H. Schervish, M.B. Dignan, Mobile mammography in underserved populations: analysis of outcomes of 3,923 women. J. Commun. Health 38(5), 900–906 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. A.J. Evans, A.R.M. Wilson, H.C. Burrell, I.O. Ellis, S.E. Pinder, Mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ present on previous mammography. Clin. Radiol. 54(10), 644–646 (1999)Google Scholar
  5. Q. Fang, J. Selb, S. Carp, G. Boverman, Combined optical and X-ray tomosynthesis breast imaging. Radiology 258(1), 89–97 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. L.S. Gold, G. Klein, L. Carr, L. Kessler, S.D. Sullivan, The emergence of diagnostic imaging technologies in breast cancer: Discovery, regulatory approval, reimbursement, and adoption in clinical guidelines. Cancer Imag. 12(1), 13–24 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Heath, K. Bowyer, D. Kopans, R. Moore, W.P. Kegelmeyer, The digital database for screening mammography, in Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Toronto Canada, ed. by M.I. Yaffe (Medical Physics Publishing, 2011), pp. 212–218Google Scholar
  8. A. Jalalian, S.B. Mashohor, H.R. Mahmud, M.I. Saripan, A.R. Raml, B. Karasfi, Computer-aided detection/diagnosis of breast cancer in mammography and ultrasound: A review. Clin. Imag. 37(3), 420–426 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D.B. Kopans, Breast imaging, 3rd edn. (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 2006)Google Scholar
  10. G. Peters, C.M. Jones, K. Daniels, Why is micro-calcification missed on mammography? J. Med. Imag. Radiation Oncol. 57(1), 32–37 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. E.D. Pisano, M.J. Yaffe, C.M. Kuzmiak, Digital mammography (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2003)Google Scholar
  12. C. Printz, ACS updates breast cancer screening guidelines. Cancer 122(5), 663 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. G.Q. Rovere, R. Warren, J.R. Benson, Early breast cancer: from screening to multidisciplinary management, 2nd edn. (Informa Healthcare, London, 2005)Google Scholar
  14. K.A. Scanlan, Teaching atlas of mammography. Am. J. Roentgenol. 177(4), 874–874 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. P. Skaane, Studies comparing screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography in breast cancer screening: updated review. Acta Radiologica 50(1), 3–14 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Suckling, J. Parker, D. Dance, S. Astley, I. Hutt, C. Boggis, I. Ricketts, E. Stamatakis, N. Cerneaz, S. Kok, P. Taylor, D. Betal, J. Savage, The mammographic image analysis society digital mammogram database, in Proceedings of International Congress Series on Exerpta Medica Digital Mammography, UK, vol. 1069 (1994), pp. 375–378Google Scholar
  17. J. Tang, R.M. Rangayyan, J. Xu, I. El Naqa, Y. Yang, Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: recent advances. IEEE Trans. Inform. Technol. Biomed. 13(2), 236–251 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. T. Tarver, Cancer facts & figures 2012: American cancer society (ACS). J. Consum. Health Internet 16(3), 366–367 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. E. Warner, D. Plewes, R. Shumak, Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 19(15), 3524–3531 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. M.J. Yaffe, Detectors for digital mammography, in Digital Mammography, ed. by U. Bick, F. Diekmann (Springer, Berlin, 2010), pp. 13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. M.J. Yaffe, J.G. Mainprize, Detectors for digital mammography. Technol. Cancer Res. Treatment 3(4), 309–324 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringShri Ramswaroop Memorial Group of Professional Colleges (SRMGPC)LucknowIndia
  2. 2.Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical UniversityLucknowIndia
  3. 3.Faculty of Electronics and Communication EngineeringShri Ramswaroop Memorial University (SRMU)BarabankiIndia
  4. 4.Department of Electrical Engineering, College of EngineeringPrincess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman UniversityRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations