A Study on Various Database Models: Relational, Graph, and Hybrid Databases

  • Shubham GuptaEmail author
  • Sovan Pal
  • Maumita Chakraborty
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1065)


Relational database is a popular database for storing various types of information. But due to the ever-increasing growth of data, it becomes hard to maintain and process the database. So, the graph model is becoming more and more popular since it can store and handle big data more efficiently compared to relational database. But both relational database and graph database have their own advantages and disadvantages. To overcome their limitations, they are combined to make a hybrid model. This paper discusses relational database, graph database, their advantages, their applications and also talks about hybrid model.


Relational database Graph database Big data Hybrid model 


  1. 1.
    Codd, E.F.: A relational model of data for large shared data banks. Commun. ACM 13(6), 377–387 (1970). Scholar
  2. 2.
    SQL Join: Last accessed 15 July 2019
  3. 3.
    SQL Foreign Key, Last accessed 15 July 2019
  4. 4.
    DBMS Transaction: Last accessed 15 July 2019
  5. 5.
    Normalization: Last accessed 24 July 2019
  6. 6.
    Database normalization, Last accessed 15 July 2019
  7. 7.
    Graph Database: Last accessed 15 July 2019
  8. 8.
    Graph Engine: Last accessed 15 July 2019
  9. 9.
    Knowledge Graph: Last accessed 15 July 2019
  10. 10.
    Introducing Graph Search Beta: Last accessed 15 July 2019
  11. 11.
    Relational Databases vs. Graph Databases: A Comparison, Last accessed 15 July 2019
  12. 12.
    Managing Network Operations with Graphs: Last accessed 15 July 2019
  13. 13.
    Difference between SQL and NoSQL—GeeksforGeeks: Last accessed 15 July 2019
  14. 14.
    Graph Databases in Big Data Analytics: Last accessed 15 July 2019
  15. 15.
    Silvescu, A., Caragea, D., Atramentov, A.: Graph database. artificial intelligence research laboratory, Department of Computer Science, Iowa State University [Online]. (2012)
  16. 16.
    Pokorny, J.: Graph databases: their power and limitations. In: IFIP International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management, pp. 58–69. Springer, Cham (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Virgilio, R.D., Maccioni, A., Torlone, R.: Converting relational to graph databases. In: Proceedings of ACM First International Workshop on Graph Data Management Experience and Systems, vol. 1, pp. 1–6 (2013).
  18. 18.
    Bordoloi, S., Kalita, B.: Designing graph database models from existing relational databases. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 74(1), 25–31 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shute, J., et al.: F1: a distributed SQL database that scales. Proc. VLDB Endowment 6(11), 1068–1079 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    James, B.E., Asagba, P.O.: Hybrid database system for bigdata storage and management. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. Appl. (IJCSEA) 7(3/4) (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Little, C.J.O.: Grapht: a hybrid database system for flexible retrieval of graph-structured data. In: Master’s thesis, University of Cambridge, Emmanuel College, Cambridge, United Kingdom (2016)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ferreira, L.: Bridging the gap between SQL and NoSQL. In: A state of art report, Universidade do Minho, pp 187–197 (2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hybrid Databases: Combining relational and NoSQL. Last accessed 15 July 2019
  24. 24.
    Vyawahare, H., Karde, P., Thakare, V.: A hybrid database approach using graph and relational database. In: International Conference on Research in Intelligent and Computing in Engineering (RICE) (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Engineering and ManagementKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations