Advertisement

Database Rights in Big Data and the Cloud—Main Legal Considerations

  • Marcelo Corrales CompagnucciEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Law, Business and Innovation book series (PLBI)

Abstract

This chapter delves into detail about the problems raised by database rights in the wake of the Internet and the Big Data era. Database rights, also known as sui generis rights, grant exclusive property protection to any creator of databases based on a qualitative or quantitative substantial investment.

References

  1. Adhikari A, Adhikari J (2015) Advanced in knowledge discovery in databases, intelligent systems reference library, preface, vol 79. Springer, Cham, pp 4–5Google Scholar
  2. Aitchison J, Gilchrist A, Bawden D (2000) Thesaurus construction and use: a practical manual, 4th edn. Aslib IMI, London, p 1Google Scholar
  3. Alsop M (2012) Data on live football was “obtained” rather than “created” and thus could be the subject of database rights, Charles Russell LLP http://www.mondaq.com/x/185708/data+protection/Data+On+Live+Football+Was+Obtained+Rather+Than+Created+And+Thus+Could+Be+The+Sub-ject+Of+Database+Rights. Accessed 10 May 2019
  4. Aplin T (2005) Copyright law in the digital society: the challenges of multimedia. Hart Publishing, Oxford, pp 45–46Google Scholar
  5. Aplin T, Davis J (2013) Intellectual property law: text, cases, and materials, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 94Google Scholar
  6. Baeza-Yates R, Ribeiro-Neto B (1999) Modern information retrieval. Addison Wesley Longman, ACM Press Books, New York, pp 99–101Google Scholar
  7. Barnitzke B, Corrales pagnucci M, Frakgouli A (2009) Legal issues in biological databases: a sui generis approach, paper presented at the 2nd international seminar of information law (ISIL), Corfu, Greece, 26 June 2009. In: Bottis M (ed) A world for information law, Proceedings of the 2nd ISIL 2009, Ionian University, Nomiki Vivliothiki, CorfuGoogle Scholar
  8. Barnitzke B, Corrales Compagnucci M, Forgó N (2012) Aspectos Legales de la Computación en la Nube: Seguridad de Datos y Derechos de Propiedad sobre los mismos, locs. 637 et seq., Kindle Edition. Editorial Albremática S.A., Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  9. Bently L, Sherman B (2009) Intellectual property law, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 310Google Scholar
  10. Bessmer N (2013) Cloud computing for small business, loc. 24, Kindle EditionGoogle Scholar
  11. Black N (2012) Cloud computing for lawyers. American Bar Association, Chicago, p 211Google Scholar
  12. Bort J (2011) 10 technologies that will change the world in the next 10 years. NetworkWorld. http://www.networkworld.com/article/2179278/lan-wan/10-technologies-that-will-change-the-world-in-the-next-10-years.html. Accessed 10 May 2019
  13. Buyya R et al (2009) Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility. Futur Gener Comput Syst 25(6):599–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carrol C (2014) What’s a cloud services broker, and why do you need one? http://www.cio.com/article/2462417/cloud-computing/cloud-computing-whats-a-cloud-services-broker-and-why-do-you-need-one.html. Accessed 10 May 2019
  15. Cherry D (2008) Scaling the database out, not up. IT Knowledge Exchange. http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/scaling-the-database-out-not-up/. Accessed 10 May 2019
  16. Columbus L (2013) Top 12 sites for free cloud computing & enterprise software research. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2013/08/25/top-12-sites-for-free-cloud-computing-enterprise-software-research/. Accessed 10 May 2019
  17. Columbus L (2014) Roundup of cloud computing forecasts and market estimates. Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2014/03/14/roundup-of-cloud-computing-forecasts-and-market-estimates-2014/. Accessed 10 May 2019
  18. Davison M (2003) The legal protection of databases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 71Google Scholar
  19. Davison M, Hugenholtz P (2005) Football fixtures, horse races and spin-offs: the ECJ domesticates the database right. EIPR 3:4Google Scholar
  20. Derclaye E (2008a) Database rights are too tough on business, says expert http://www.out-law.com/page-9406. Accessed 10 May 2019
  21. Derclaye E (2008b) The legal protection of databases: a comparative analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 45–46Google Scholar
  22. Derclaye E (2012) Football Dataco: skill and labour is dead! Kluwer Copyright Blog http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2012/03/01/football-dataco-skill-and-labour-is-dead/. Accessed 10 May 2019
  23. Dommering E, Hugenholtz P (eds) (1991) Protecting works of fact: copyright, freedom of expression, and information law. Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers, BostonGoogle Scholar
  24. Dumbill E (2012) Getting up to speed with big data: what is big data? loc. 30. In: O’Reilly Media, Big data: current perspectives from O’Reilly Media. O’Reilly Media Inc., BeijingGoogle Scholar
  25. Elegido J (1993) A basic rationale for contracts, Persona y Derecho 28:69 http://ssrn.com/abstract=2515272. Accessed 10 May 2019
  26. Gasaway L (2006) Databases and the law, Cyberspace law course, Spring 2006. University of North Carolina, Chapel HillGoogle Scholar
  27. Gaster J (2005) “Obtinere” of data in the eyes of the ECJ: how to interpret the database directive after the British Horseracing Board Ltd. et al v William Hill Organization Ltd. Comput Law Rev Int 6(5):129–135Google Scholar
  28. Gilchrist A (1971) The thesaurus in retrieval. Aslib IMI, London, p 4Google Scholar
  29. Grosheide F (2002) Database protection—the European way. Washington University Journal of Law & Policy 8:39. In: Symposium on intellectual property, digital technology & electronic commerce. http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol8/iss1/4. Accessed 10 May 2019
  30. Grossman D, Frieder O (2004) Information retrieval: algorithms and heuristics. The information retrieval series, vol 15, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht, p 105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Helling E (2004) Retrieving the sources of legal decision-making, technical possibilities and related legal issues. In: Wahlgren P (ed) Scandinavian studies in law, vol 47. Stockholm, p 545Google Scholar
  32. Hugenholzt P (2004) Abuse of database right: sole-source information banks under the EU database directive. http://www.ivir.nl/publications/hugenholtz/abuseofdatabaseright.html. Accessed 10 May 2019
  33. Ito A (2011) Legal aspects of satellite remote sensing. Studies in space law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, pp 222 et seqCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kalyvas J (2015) A big data primer for executives. In: Kalyvas J, Overly M (eds) Big data: a business and legal guide. CRC Press, Boca Ratón, p 1Google Scholar
  35. Karimi H (ed) (2014) Big data: techniques and technologies in geoinformation. CRC Press, Boca RatónGoogle Scholar
  36. Kaye L (2010) The directive on the legal protection of databases of March 11 1996: does it have a future? http://copyright-debate.co.uk/?p=154. Accessed 10 May 2019
  37. Kingston W (2010) Beyond intellectual property: matching information protection to innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, p 112Google Scholar
  38. Kroes Q (2010) E-business law of the European Union, 2nd edn. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 8–9Google Scholar
  39. Kur A, Dreir T (2013) European intellectual property law: text, cases & materials. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, p 267Google Scholar
  40. Leistner M (2010) Der Rechtsschutz von Datenbanken im deutschen und europäischen Recht: Eine Untersuchung zur Richtlinie 96/9/EG und zu ihrer Umsetzung in das deutsche Urheberrechtsgesetz, vol 34 de Urheberrechtliche Abhandlungen des Max-Planck-Instituts für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht. Beck C. H., Munich, p 15Google Scholar
  41. Lesk A (2008) Introduction to bioinformatics, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 153Google Scholar
  42. Loshin D (2013) Big data analytics: from strategic planning to enterprise integration with tools, techniques, NoSQL, and graph. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  43. Lungarella M et al (2007) AI in the 21st century—with historical reflections. In: Lungarella M et al (eds) 50 years of artificial intelligence: essays dedicated to the 50th anniversary of artificial intelligence. Springer, Berlin, p 1Google Scholar
  44. MacQueen H et al (2011) Contemporary intellectual property: law and policy. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 221Google Scholar
  45. Maggs A (2012) Are you creating data? Then the database directive is (probably) not for you! Cookies on the Wragge & Co website http://www.wragge-law.com/insights/are-you-creating-data-then-the-database-directive/. Accessed 10 May 2019
  46. Mandery M (2014) Party autonomy in contractual and non-contractual obligations: a European and anglo-common law perspective on the freedom of choice of law in the Rome I regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations and the Rome II regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations, comparative and international law studies (Book 189). Peter Lang GmbH., Frankfurt am Main, pp 1–310Google Scholar
  47. Markel S, León D (2003) Sequence analysis in a nutshell: a guide to common tools and databases, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol, p 26Google Scholar
  48. Marx V (2013) Biology: the big challenges of big data. Nature 498:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mayer-Schoenberger B, Cukier K (2013) Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. John Murray Publishers, London, pp 1–7, 12–18, 98–197Google Scholar
  50. Muir H (2010) “Party autonomy” in international contracts: from the makings of a myth to the requirements of global governance. Eur Rev Contract Law (ERCL) 6(3):250–283Google Scholar
  51. Oliva M, Corrales Compagnucci M (2011) Law meets biology: are our databases eligible for legal protection? SCRIPTed 8(3):226–228Google Scholar
  52. Osborne C (2012) No spin-off: database rights subsist in live football data—the high court gives its judgment in the Football Dataco v Sportradar case http://www.osborneclarke.com/connected-insights/publications/no-spin-database-rights-subsist-live-football-data/. Accessed 10 May 2019
  53. Papakonstantinou V (2010) Intellectual property rights: the security perspective. In: Jahankhani H et al (eds) Handbook of electronic security and digital forensics. World Scientific, New Jersey, p 494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pellegrin T (2014) Economics of big data: a value perspective on state of the art and future trends. In: Akerkar R (ed) Big data computing. CRC Press, Boca Ratón, p 345Google Scholar
  55. Pries K, Dunnigan R (2015) Big data analytics: a practical guide for managers. CRC Press, Boca RatónCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Radin M, Rothchild J, Silverman G (2004) Intellectual property and the internet. Foundation Press, New York, pp 318–319Google Scholar
  57. Reed C, Angel J (2007) Computer law: the law and regulation of information technology, 6th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 423Google Scholar
  58. Reichman J, Samuelson P (1997) Intellectual property rights in data. Vanderbilt Law Rev 50(51):164Google Scholar
  59. Reinbothe J, Von Lewinski S (2007) The WIPO Treaties 1996: the WIPO copyright treaty and the WIPO performances and phonograms treaty—commentary and legal analysis. Tottel Publishing Ltd, West Sussex, pp 486–494Google Scholar
  60. Rowland D, MacDonald E (2005) Information technology law, 3rd edn. Cavendish Publishing Ltd., London, p 92Google Scholar
  61. Sell S (2003) Private power, public law: the globalization of intellectual property rights. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 27Google Scholar
  62. Sherman B, Bently L (1999) The making of modern intellectual property law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 43 and 206Google Scholar
  63. Spinello R, Bottis M (2009) A defense of intellectual property rights. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, p 75Google Scholar
  64. Stamatoudi I (2000) To what extent are multimedia products databases? In: Stamatoudi I, Torremans P (eds) Copyright in the new digital environment: the need to redesign copyright. Perspectives on intellectual property law, vol 8. Sweet & Maxwell Ltd., London, pp 23–24Google Scholar
  65. Stimmel C (2015) Big data analytics strategies for the smart grid. CRC Press, Boca RatónGoogle Scholar
  66. Stokes S (2009) Digital copyright: law and practice. Hart Publishing, Oxford, p 62Google Scholar
  67. Sundara Rajan M (2011) Moral Rights: principles, practice and new technology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 286Google Scholar
  68. Waelde C, MacGinley M (2005) Public domain, public interest, public funding: focusing on the three Ps in scientific research. SCRIPTed—J Law Technol Soc 2(1):78Google Scholar
  69. Waelde C et al (2013) Contemporary intellectual property: law and policy, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang P, Goertzel B (eds) (2007) Advances in artificial general intelligence: concepts, architectures and algorithms. In: Proceedings of the AGI workshop 2006. IOS Press, Amsterdam, p 1Google Scholar
  71. Wery E (2015) Legal protection of databases. http://www.ulys.net/up-load/file/Database.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2019
  72. Williams A et al (2005) Biological databases: infrastructure, content and integration. In: Azuaje F, Dopazo J (eds) Data analysis and visualization in genomics and proteomics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 12–13Google Scholar
  73. WIPO (2004) WIPO intellectual property handbook: policy, law and use, 2nd edn. WIPO publication no. 489 (E), pp 274, 441Google Scholar
  74. Yamane H (2011) Interpreting TRIPS: globalization of intellectual property rights and access to medicines, introduction. Hart Publishing, Oxford, p 158Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Studies in Biomedical Innovation Law (CeBIL)University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations