Advertisement

Performance Analysis of Routing Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks

  • Jameel AhamedEmail author
  • Waseem Ahmed Mir
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1059)

Abstract

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) are interconnected sensor devices that can detect process and communicate data over large distances in large geographical areas. Today sensor devices have found their use in defense services, notably military services, disaster management, medical services, wildlife monitoring and precision agriculture, and in habitat monitoring and logistics. Since the sensor devices are small, they have limited energy resources that reduce their service life. Because of this restriction, energy management is the primary research area in these networks. This study determines the performance of five routing protocols: Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), Temporally Ordered Routing Algorithm (TORA), Optimized Link State Routing Protocol (OLSR), Geographical Routing Protocol (GRP), Distance Routing Effect Algorithm for Mobility (DREAM) and their comparison. The results are shown in three scenarios whereby DREAM is considered as one of the best routing protocols based on four performance metrics.

Keywords

Routing protocols AODV DREAM TORA OLSR GRP 

References

  1. 1.
    Jamatia A et al (2015) Performance analysis of hierarchical and flat network routing protocols in wireless sensor network using NS-2. Int J Model Optim 5(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rezaei Z, Mobininejad S (2012) Energy saving in wireless sensor networks. Int J Comput Sci Eng Surv 3(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mir W, Ahmad J (2017) Energy management in wireless sensor networks—a review. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci 8(4)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khiavi MV, Jamali S, Gudakahriz SJ (2012) Performance comparison of AODV, DSDV, DSR and TORA routing protocols in MANETs. Int Res J Appl Basic Sci 3(7):1429–1436Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kumar S, Saket RK (2011) Performance metric of AODV and DSDV routing protocols in MANETs using NS-2. Int J Recent Res Appl Stud 7(3)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mauve M, Widmer J, Hartenstein H (2001) A survey on position-based routing in mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Network 1(6):30–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mohapatra S, Kanungo P (2012) Performance analysis of AODV, DSR, OLSR and DSDV routing protocols using NS2 simulator, vol 30. In: International conference on communication technology and system design, pp 69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clausen T, Philippe J (2003) Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR). No. RFC 3626Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mittal P, Singh P, Rani S (2013) Performance analysis of AODV, OLSR, GRP and DSR routing protocols with database load in MANET. Int J Res Eng Technol 2(9):412–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yassine M, Ezzati A (2014) Performance analysis of routing protocols for wireless sensor networks. In: 2014 Third IEEE international Colloquium in Information Science and Technology (CIST), IEEE, pp 420–424Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yan J, Zhou M, Ding Z (2016) Recent advances in energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: a review. IEEE Access 4:5673–5686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luo RC, Chen O (2012) Mobile sensor node deployment and asynchronous power management for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 59(5):2377–2385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Khan JA, Qureshi HK, Iqbal A (2015) Energy management in wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput Electr Eng 41:159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Information TechnologyMANUU HyderabadHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations