Design of Equidistant Hexagonal Coil System for Demagnetization of Naval Vehicles

  • Ratan SinghEmail author
  • Sonal Jain
  • Vikas Singh
  • Faruk Kazi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 609)


In various applications of defence and research such as demagnetization of naval vehicles and satellites, removal of residual magnetic field plays an essential role. For such use cases, conventional way of demagnetization is the use of Helmholtz coils and Merritt coils. These coil systems produce uniform magnetic field, but the volume of the uniform region is relatively smaller. Therefore, for the applications which require patch of uniform magnetic field for longer longitudinal length of the region such as deperming process of Submarine, Aircraft Carrier; these coil systems become infeasible to implement practically due to their enormous size. Another impediment in implementation of above-mentioned coil system is that when size of coil system becomes larger, the requirement current also increases for the same degree of results. This increasing amount of current poses issues of more complexities in electrical control circuits, heat dissipation and cost. Another disadvantage with such system is that a slight shift from the optimized position causes a larger change in uniformity, and thus, such systems are not robust with shift in location. This paper proposes a novel method for the design of a higher-order equidistant coil system which overcomes these flaws and presents a technique to compute the ampere-turns requirement of each coil for generation of higher-degree homogeneous magnetic field. The system so designed has more feasible design parameters as compared to the conventional systems for high uniformity applications. The proposed system is sturdier and fault tolerant against any deviation or error from the ideal design parameters. The theoretical results are matched against the finite element simulation software Opera which are in close agreement.


Hexagonal coils of higher orders Equidistant coil Field homogeneity Deperming Opera 



The authors would like to acknowledge the support of Centre of Excellence in Complex and Nonlinear Dynamic Systems (CoE-CNDS), VJTI, Mumbai, India, under TEQIP-II (subcomponent 1.2.1).


  1. 1.
    Pittman ME, Waidelich DL (1964) Three and four coil systems for homogeneous magnetic fields. IEEE Trans Aerosp 2(1):36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Di Barba P, Dughiero F, Sieni E (2010) Magnetic field synthesis in the design of inductors for magnetic fluid hyperthermia. IEEE Trans Magn 46(8):2931–2934 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhatt V, Rautela RS, Sharma P, Tiwari DC, Khushu S (2010) Design and development of helmholtz coil for hyperpolarized MRI. Timarpur, Delhi (India) 110054Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brooks N, Baldwin T (2002) Methodology for universal synthesis of magnetic designs based on field specifications. In: Proceedings of the thirty-fourth southeastern symposium on system theory (Cat. No. 02EX540), pp 113–117Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cvetkovic D, Cosic I (2007) Modelling and design of extremely low frequency uniform magnetic field exposure apparatus for in vivo bioelectromagnetic studies. In: 2007 29th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, Lyon, pp 1675–1678Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Firester AH (1966) Design of square helmholtz coil systems. Rev Sci Instrum 37(9):1264–1265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Magdaleno Adame S, Olivares Galvan JC, Campero Littlewood E, Escarela Perez R, Blanco Brisset E (2010) Coil systems to generate uniform magnetic field volumes. In: Excerpt from the proceedings of the COMSOL conference, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Merritt R, Purcell C, Stroink G (1983) Uniform magnetic field produced by three, four, and five square coils. Rev Sci Instrum 54(7):879–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Griffiths D (2014) Introduction to electrodynamics. Pearson, HarlowGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Azipurua MA (2012) A semi-analytical method for the design of coil-systems for homogeneous magnetostatic field generation. Prog Electromagn Res B 37:171–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Herceg D, Juhas A, Milutinov M (2009) A design of a square coil system for a biomagnetic experiment. 22(3):285–292Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rubens SM (1945) Cube-surface coil for producing a uniform mag-netic field. Rev Sci Instrum 16(9)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Michaelides A, Aird G, Riley C, Simkin J (2004) Electromagnetic simulation: successful applications and future challenges. Vector Fields Ltd 24 Bankside, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1JE United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kirschvink JL (1992) Uniform magnetic fields and double wrapped coil systems: improved techniques for the design of bioelectromagnetic ex-periments. Bioelectromagnetics 13(5):401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ratan Singh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sonal Jain
    • 2
  • Vikas Singh
    • 1
  • Faruk Kazi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringVeermata Jijabai Technological InstituteMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Information TechnologyA.P. Shah Institute of TechnologyThaneIndia

Personalised recommendations