Advertisement

Supplementary Approaches to Shared Transboundary Water Management

  • David B. BrooksEmail author
  • Julie Trottier
  • Giulia Giordano
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs on Case Studies of Sustainable Development book series (BRIEFSCSSD)

Abstract

The EcoPeace Proposal is considered to be the most attractive way to move Israel, Palestine, and Jordan toward a final status agreement for their shared water resources. However, they are not the only way, and this chapter focuses on four supplemental or alternative ways for dealing with regional water issues: the Mountain Aquifer study shows how the EcoPeace Proposal could be tried first at smaller scale; the Lower Jordan Basin project is an actual example of what can be achieved in a transboundary region that is highly sensitive ecologically but with a large economic potential; the Red Sea-Dead Sea Water Conveyance (RSDSWC) project is a proposed way of meeting both water and electricity shortages, mainly in Jordan, by conventional means but at massive cost; finally the Water-Energy Nexus is both a modern response to water insecurity and an opportunity for regional integration. The Chapter concludes with a note on the experience of EcoPeace in its presentations before the United Nations Security Council.

References

  1. Alagona PS, Smith CF (2012) Mirage in the making: Mojave dreams. Boom J Calif 2(3):25-44; Photographs by Christopher WoodcockGoogle Scholar
  2. Axworthy T, Sanford R (2012) The global water crisis: framing the issue. In: Biggs H (ed) The global water crisis: addressing an urgent security issue. Papers for the InterAction Council: UNU-INWEH,. Hamilton, ON, Canada, pp 2–7Google Scholar
  3. Baltutis J (2011) Economic benefits of access to a healthy Lower Jordan River for the Palestinian Economy. Friends of the Earth Middle East, Amman, Bethlehem and Tel Aviv. http://hispagua.cedex.es/sites/default/files/hispagua_documento/documentacion/documentos/jordan_saludable.pdf
  4. Feitelson E, Haddad M (1998a) Identification of joint management structures for shared aquifers: a cooperative Palestinian-Israeli effort. World Bank technical paper no. 415. World Bank, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feitelson E, Haddad M (1998b) A stepwise open-ended approach to the identification of joint management structures for shared aquifers (Israel and Palestinian Authority). Water Int 23(4):227–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feitelson E, Haddad M (eds) (2000) Management of shared groundwater resources: The Israeli-Palestinian case with an international perspective. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, and Kluwer Academic, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Gafny S, Talozi S, Al Sheikh B, Ya’ari E (2010) Towards a living Jordan River: an environmental flows report on the rehabilitation of the Lower Jordan River. Friends of the Earth Middle East, Amman, Bethlehem, Tel Aviv. http://foeme.org/uploads/publications_publ117_1.pdf
  8. Hylton E et al (2012) Take me over the Jordan: Concept document to rehabilitate, promote prosperity, and help bring peace to the Lower Jordan valley. Friends of the Earth Middle East, Amman, Bethlehem, Tel AvivGoogle Scholar
  9. Hussein H (2017) Politics of the Dead Sea canal: a historical review of the evolving discourses, interests, and plans. Water Int 42(5):527–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IPCRI (Israel/Palestine Center for Research and Information) (2004) In: Abstracts, vol 2nd Israeli-Palestinian international academic conference on water for life in the Middle East. JerusalemGoogle Scholar
  11. Issac J, Shuval HI (eds) (1994) Water and peace in the Middle East: In: Proceedings of the first Israeli-Palestinian international academic conference on water. Elsevier; Studies in Environmental Science No. 58, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. Katz D, Shafran A (eds) (2017) Water-energy nexus. A pre-feasibility study for Mid-East water-renewable energy exchanges. EcoPeace Middle East, Amman, Ramallah, Tel Aviv, and Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, AmmanGoogle Scholar
  13. Katz D, Shafran A (2019) Transboundary exchanges of renewable energy and desalinated water in the Middle East. Energies 12(8):1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moore-O’Leary KA, Hernandez RR, Johnston DS et al (2017) Sustainability of utility‐scale solar energy—critical ecological concepts. Front Ecol Environ 15(7):385–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Puri S, Aureli A (2005) Transboundary aquifers: a global program to assess, evaluate, and develop policy. Ground Water 43(5):661–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Safier G, Arbel Y, Bromberg G, Ya’ari E (2011) Road map for the restoration of the Lower Jordan River. Friends of the Earth Middle East, Amman, Bethlehem, Tel Aviv. http://foeme.org/uploads/DHV_Report_Ex_Summary_E_11_2011%281%29.pdf
  17. Spiritos E, Lipchin C (2013) Desalination in Israel. In: Becker N (ed) Water policy in Israel: context, issues and options. Springer, Dodrecht, Netherlands, pp 101–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Aken M, Molle F, Venot J-P (2009) Squeezed dry: the historical trajectory of the Lower Jordan River Basin. In: Molle F, Wester P (eds) River basin trajectories: societies, environments and development. CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK, pp 20–46Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • David B. Brooks
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julie Trottier
    • 2
  • Giulia Giordano
    • 3
  1. 1.University of VictoriaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.ART-Dev, Site Saint-CharleDirectrice de Recherche CNRSMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.EcoPeace Middle EastTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations