Advertisement

Symmetrical Fault—Swing Discrimination Using RMS Index-Based Superimposed Current Signals

  • K. R. AndanapalliEmail author
  • M. Biswal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 608)

Abstract

To maintain reliable and secured power system operation, relays are designed to operate at a faster rate so as to provide an appropriate tripping signal to circuit breakers under any abnormal transient condition. During swing phenomenon, operation of a relay is required to block with the help of PSB function so that any nuisance operation can be avoided. Unblocking operation can easily be issued by the relay in case of an unsymmetrical fault, but detection of symmetrical fault is a difficult task. A novel approach to discriminate three-phase fault from power swing using the root mean square (RMS) value of superimposed current signal is proposed in this paper. Superimposed current signal is estimated by taking the difference between two consecutive cycles considering the recursive window approach. The index is then computed by estimating the RMS value from the one-cycle superimposed current components. The generated index helps the relay to discriminate symmetrical fault from power swing. To verify the response of proposed method, a 400 kV, 50 Hz WSCC 9-bus test system is considered and simulated with different fault cases. The power system model is simulated using PSCAD/EMTDC software, and results indicate the robustness of the proposed algorithm.

Keywords

Transmission lines Superimposed current components RMS index Power swing Symmetrical faults 

References

  1. 1.
    Power System Relay Committee (2005) Power swing and out-of-step considerations on transmission lines. IEEE PSRC Working Group D6, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kundur P (1994) Power system stability and control. Tata McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brahma SM (2007) Distance relay with out-of-step blocking function using wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 22(3):1360–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dubey R, Samantaray SR (2013) Wavelet singular entropy based symmetrical fault-detection and out-of-step protection during power swing. IET Gener Transm Distrib 7(10):1123–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lotfifard S, Faiz J, Kezunovic M (2010) Detection of symmetrical faults by distance relays during power swings. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 25(1):81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahamedi B, Zhu J (2012) A novel approach to detect symmetrical faults occurring during power swing using frequency components of instantaneous three-phase active power. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 27(3):1368–1375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rao JG, Pradhan AK (2016) Accurate phasor estimation during power swing. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 31(1):130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao JG, Pradhan AK (2012) Differential power-based symmetrical fault detection during power swing. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 27(3):1557–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rao JG, Pradhan AK (2015) Power swing detection using moving averaging of current signals. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 30(1):368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Khodaparast J, Khederzadeh M (2015) Three-phase fault detection during power swing by transient monitor. IEEE Trans Power Syst 30(5):2558–2565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dubey R, Samantaray SR, Panigrahi BK, Venkoparao VG (2016) Phase-space based symmetrical fault detection during power swing. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10(8):1947–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kumar J, Jena P (2017) Solution to fault detection during power swing using Teager–Kaiser energy operator. Arab J Sci Eng 42:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kundu P, Pradhan AK (2014) Wide area measurement based protection support during power swing. Int J Elect Power Energy Syst 63:546–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Biswal S, Biswal M (2018) Fault-swing discrimination using Hilbert-hung transform integrated discrete Teager-Kaiser energy operator. IET Sci Meas Technol 12(7):829–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prabhu MS, Nayak PK, Pradhan G (2018) Detection of three-phase fault during power swing using zero frequency filtering. Int Trans Electr Energy Syst 1–15Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andanapalli K, Nagaraju KV, Biswal M (2018) Symmetrical fault detection during power swing: a comparative study. In: Proceedings of the EECCMC international conference on electrical, electronics, computers, communication, mechanical and computingGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nayak PK, Pradhan AK, Bajpai P (2013) A fault detection technique for the series compensated line during power swing. IEEE Trans Power Deliv 28(2):714–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringNIT RaipurRaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations