Advertisement

Analysis of Human Error of EHS in Healthcare Industry Using TISM

  • R. K. A. Bhalaji
  • S. BathrinathEmail author
  • Chitrasen Samantra
  • S. Saravanasankar
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1057)

Abstract

Human error plays a key role in healthcare industry. The risk factors for human error involved in environmental health and safety section is extremely high when compared to other sections. The objective of this paper is to recognize the most influential factors for human error of EHS in healthcare industry. The risk factors are identified from the literature survey as well as inputs from industrial experts. The identified factors are analyzed using one of the soft computing tools known as total interpretive structural modeling (TISM). The model of TISM clearly shows the driving power and reliance power of the factor. A case empirical study is conducted in an Indian healthcare industry for verifying the suggested model. The outcomes of the paper will help industrial managers for implementing the framework of EHS and also will enhance the managerial excellence. Finally, to verity the TISM results, a statistical validation is done using covariance-based structural equation modeling (CBSEM).

Keywords

Human error EHS TISM CBSEM India 

References

  1. 1.
    Afthanorhan, W.M.A.B.W.: A comparison of partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and covariance based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) for confirmatory factor analysis. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Innovative Technol. 2(5), 198–205 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agarwal, A., Vrat, P.: A TISM based bionic model of organizational excellence. Global J. Flex. Syst. Manage. 16(4), 361–376 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ali, F., Kim, W.G., Li, J., Cobanoglu, C.: A comparative study of covariance and partial least squares based structural equation modeling in hospitality and tourism research. Int. J. Contemp. Hospitality Manage. 30(1), 416–435 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bowie, P., Skinner, J., de Wet, C.: Training health care professionals in root cause analysis: a cross-sectional study of post-training experiences, benefits and attitudes. BMC Health Serv. Res. 13(1), 50 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Charles, P.G., Grayson, M.L., Angus, P.W., Sasadeusz, J.J.: Management of healthcare workers after occupational exposure to hepatitis C virus. Med. J. Aust. 179(3), 153–157 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chow, C.W., Ganulin, D., Haddad, K., Williamson, J.: The balanced scorecard: a potent tool for energizing and focusing healthcare organization management. J. Healthc. Manag. 43(3), 263–280 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Donaldson, M. S., Corrigan, J. M., & Kohn, L. T. (Eds.).: To err is human: building a safer health system (Vol. 6). National Academies Press, (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dünnebeil, S., Sunyaev, A., Blohm, I., Leimeister, J.M., Krcmar, H.: Determinants of physicians’ technology acceptance for e-health in ambulatory care. Int. J. Med. Inform. 81(11), 746–760 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flaspöler, E., Hauke, A., Pappachan, P., Reinert, D., Bleyer, T., Henke, N., Beeck, R. O. D.: The Human-Machine Interface as an Emerging Risk. EU-OSHA (European Agency for Safety and Health at Work), Luxemburgo (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hair Jr., J.F., Babin, B.J., Krey, N.: Covariance-based structural equation modeling in the Journal of Advertising: Review and recommendations. J. Advertising 46(1), 163–177 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jayalakshmi, B., Pramod, V.R.: Total interpretive structural modeling (TISM) of the enablers of a flexible control system for industry. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manage. 16(1), 63–85 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Leape, L.L., Woods, D.D., Hatlie, M.J., Kizer, K.W., Schroeder, S.A., Lundberg, G.D.: Promoting patient safety by preventing medical error. JAMA 280(16), 1444–1447 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Redinger, C.F., Levine, S.P., Blotzer, M.J., Majewski, M.P.: Evaluation of an occupational health and safety management system performance measurement tool—III: measurement of initiation elements. AIHA J. 63(1), 41–46 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rivers, P.A., Glover, S.H.: Health care competition, strategic mission, and patient satisfaction: research model and propositions. J. Health Organ. Manage. 22(6), 627–641 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rogers, A.E., Hwang, W.T., Scott, L.D., Aiken, L.H., Dinges, D.F.: The working hours of hospital staff nurses and patient safety. Health Aff. 23(4), 202–212 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rooney, J.J., Heuvel, L.N.V., Lorenzo, D.K.: Reduce human error. Qual. Prog. 35(9), 27–36 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scotti, D.J., Driscoll, A.E., Harmon, J., Behson, S.J.: Links among high-performance work environment, service quality, and customer satisfaction: an extension to the healthcare sector. J. Healthcare Manage. 52(2), 109–124 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Warfield, J.N.: On arranging elements of a hierarchy in graphic form. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 2, 121–132 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Warren, N., Hodgson, M., Craig, T., Dyrenforth, S., Perlin, J., Murphy, F.: Employee working conditions and healthcare system performance: the Veterans Health Administration experience. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 49(4), 417–429 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. K. A. Bhalaji
    • 1
  • S. Bathrinath
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chitrasen Samantra
    • 2
  • S. Saravanasankar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKalasalingam Academy of Research and EducationKrishnankoilIndia
  2. 2.Department of Production EngineeringParala Maharaja Engineering CollegeBerhampurIndia

Personalised recommendations