Advertisement

Squeeze Film in a Ferrofluid Lubricated Rough Conical Plates: Comparison of Porous Structures

  • R. M. PatelEmail author
  • Gunamani Deheri
  • Pragna A. Vadher
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1057)

Abstract

Present article is a comparison of the effects of porous structures on a Ferro fluid-based squeeze film in rough porous conical plates. The globular sphere model of Kozeny—Carman and capillary fissures model due to Irmay for porous structure have been considered for the investigation. The model of Christensen and Tonder has been imposed to calculate the effect of roughness. The distribution of pressure in the bearing is got by solving the concern equation of Reynolds’. Obtained results show that increasing values of the magnetization parameter result in increased load-carrying capacity. The effect of transverse roughness has been established to be adverse for both the structures. However, this effect is sharper for Irmay’s model. Besides, the contrary effect of porosity and roughness can be reduced by the positive effect of magnetization at least in the case of globular sphere model due to Kozeny—Carman. The semi-vertical angle of the cone also provides support in minimizes the poor effect of negatively skewed roughness. This article offers the suggestion that the Kozeny—Carman model may be preferred as related to the model proposed by Irmay.

Keywords

Conical plates Magnetic fluid Porous structure Roughness Squeeze film 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Constructive suggestions and positive remarks by the reviewers for the improvement of the presentation and quality of this research article are acknowledged with regards.

References

  1. 1.
    Prakash, J., Vij, S.K.: Load capacity and time height relations for squeeze film between porous plates. Wear 24, 309–322 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Verma, P.D.S.: Magnetic fluid based squeeze films. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 24(3), 395–401 (1986)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bhat, M.V., Deheri, G.M.: Squeeze film behavior in porous annular disks lubricated with magnetic fluid. Wear. 151, 123–128(1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deheri, G.M., Patel, R.M., Abhangi, N.D.: Magnetic fluid-based squeeze film behavior between transversely rough curved annular plates. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin, J.-R., Lu, R.-F., Liao, W.-H.: Analysis of magneto-hydrodynamic squeeze film characteristics between curved annular plates. Ind. Lubr. Tribol., 56(5), 300–305(2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patel, R.M., Deheri, G.M.: Magnetic fluid based porous conical plates. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 59(3), 143–147 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vadher, P.A., Deheri, G.M., Patel, R.M.: Performance of hydromagnetic squeeze films between conducting porous rough conical plates. Meccanica 45(6), 767–783 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andharia, P.I., Deheri, G.M.: Longitudinal roughness effect on magnetic fluid based squeeze film between conical plates. Ind. Lubr. Tribol. 62(5), 285–291 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin, J.-R.: Derivation of ferrofluid lubrication equation of cylindrical squeeze films with convective fluid inertia forces and application to circular disks. Tribol. Int. 49, 110–115 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andharia, P.I., Deheri, G.M.: Performance of magnetic fluid based squeeze fil between longitudinally rough elliptical plates. ISRN Tribology, Article ID 482604, 6 p (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patel, J.R., Deheri, G.M.: Shliomis model based magnetic fluid lubrication of a squeeze film in rotating rough curved circular plates. Caribb. J. Sci. Technol. 1, 138–150 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patel, J.R., Deheri, G.M.: Theoretical study of Shliomis model based magnetic squeeze film in rough curved annular plates with assorted porous structures. FME Transaction (2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christensen, H., Tonder, K.: Tribology of rough surfaces. Stochastic models of hydrodynamic lubrication. SINTEF, Section for Machine Dynamics in Tribology, Technical University of Norway, Trondheim, Norway, Report No.10/69-18(1969a)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Christensen, H., Tonder, K.: Tribology of rough surfaces, parametric study and comparison of lubrication models. SINTEF, Section for Machine Dynamics in Tribology, Technical University of Norway, Trondheim, Norway, Report No.22/69-18(1969b)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Christensen, H., Tonder, K.: The hydrodynamic lubrication of rough bearing surfaces of finite width. ASME-ASLE Lubrication conference Cincinnati, Ohio, October 12–15, Lub-7 (1970)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, Jun: Analysis of a porous elastic sheet damper with a magnetic fluid. J. Tribol. 131, 0218011–0218015 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Irmay, S.: Flow of liquid through cracked media. Bull. Res. Counc., Isr., 5A(1), 84 (1955)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Patel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gunamani Deheri
    • 2
  • Pragna A. Vadher
    • 3
  1. 1.Gujarat Arts and Science CollegeAhmedabadIndia
  2. 2.Mathematics DepartmentS. P. UniversityV.V. NagarIndia
  3. 3.Physics DepartmentGovt. Sci. CollegeGandhinagarIndia

Personalised recommendations