Advertisement

Tax Rulings, State Aid and the Rule of Law

  • Aleksandra BalEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In 2013, the European Commission started investigating the compatibility of tax rulings granted to multinational companies by their domestic tax administrations with EU State aid law. So far, the Commission has found State aid to be present in nearly each case it has been investigating. The investigations have resulted in a situation where the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination (pursued by the State aid rules) and the principle of legal certainty (which underlies the instrument of a tax ruling) come into conflict. This chapter evaluates the European Commission’s State aid investigations from the perspective of the Rule of Law, which embodies the core values of equality and legal certainty. The chapter concludes that a system of fair taxation, which the European Commission seeks to establish, cannot be achieved if the fundamental elements of the Rule of Law, such as legal certainty and predictability, are at risk. State aid rules should not be used to remedy shortcomings in the tax legislation or administration of the Member States and to scrutinize binding decisions of national tax authorities.

Keywords

State aid European Union Tax ruling Certainty Rule of law 

References

  1. Alarie, Ben, et al. 2014. Advance Tax Rulings in Perspective: A Theoretical and Comparative Analysis. New Zealand Journal of Taxation and Policy 20: 362.Google Scholar
  2. Buendía Sierra, José Luis. 2015. State Aid and Tax Rulings: An Appropriate Way to Tackle Aggressive Tax Planning. Bloomberg BNA: Tax and Accounting Center.Google Scholar
  3. Cowdery, Nicholas. 2015. Magna Carta: 800 Years Young. Australian Bar Review 40: 101.Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, Maarten J. 1999. General Report. IFA Cahiers de Droit Fiscal International. Online. Books IBFD, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. European Commission. 2014. State aid: Commission Extends Information Enquiry on Tax. Rulings Practice to All Member States.Google Scholar
  6. European Commission. 2015. Commission Decides Selective Tax Advantages for Fiat in. Luxembourg and Starbucks in the Netherlands are illegal under EU state aid rules. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5880_en.htm.
  7. European Commission. 2016a. Guidelines for a Model for a European Taxpayers’ Code.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. 2016b. Communication from the Commission: Commission Notice on the notion of State aid as referred to in Article 107(1) TFEU (2016/C 262/01). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2016.262.01.0001.01.ENG&toc=OJ:C:2016:262:TOC.
  9. European Commission. 2016c. DG Competition Working Paper on State Aid and Tax. Rulings. http://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/legislation/working_paper_tax_rulings.pdf.
  10. European Commission. 2017. State aid: Commission opens in-depth investigation into UK tax scheme for multinationals. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-17-4201_en.htmEuropean Parliament. 2015. Tax Rulings in the Member States, 27.
  11. Fernández-Villaverde, Jesús. 2016. Magna Carta, the rule of law, and the limits on government. International Review of Law and Economics 47: 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Givati, Yehonatan. 2009. Resolving Legal Uncertainty: The Unfulfilled Promise of Advance Tax Rulings. Virginia Tax Review 29: 137.Google Scholar
  13. Grotherr, Siegfried, and Patrick Wittenstein. 2015a. Veröffentlichungspraxis bei Advance Tax Rulings in den BRICS-Staaten. IWB 18: 678–684.Google Scholar
  14. Grotherr, Siegfried, and Patrick Wittenstein. 2015b. Wie werden verbindliche Auskünfte der Steuerverwaltung (Advance Tax Rulings) in anderen Staaten veröffentlicht. SWI 293–305.Google Scholar
  15. Grotherr, Siegfried, and Patrick Wittenstein. 2015c. Veröffentlichungspraxis bei Advance Tax Rulings in ausgewählten OECD-Staaten. IWB 13: 490–498.Google Scholar
  16. Hayek, Friedrich A. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago press.Google Scholar
  17. Herzfeld, Mindy. 2016. News Analysis: State Aid Bureaucrats Run Amok, TaxAnalysts, Doc.2016-12248.Google Scholar
  18. Hoor, Oliver R., and Keith O’Donnell. 2016. State Aid Investigations in the EU: How the EU Commission Risks the International Consensus on BEPS. Tax and Accounting Center, Bloomberg BNA.Google Scholar
  19. Jensen, Michael C. 2009. Integrity is a Matter of a Person’s Word - Nothing More and Nothing Less. Rotman Magazine.Google Scholar
  20. Lang, Michael. 2015. Tax Rulings and State Aid Law. British Tax Review 3: 391.Google Scholar
  21. Louge, Kyle D. 2007. Optimal Tax Compliance and Penalties When the Law Is Uncertain. Virginia Tax Review 27: 241.Google Scholar
  22. OECD. 1990. Taxpayers’ Rights and Obligations: A Survey of the Legal Situation in OECD Countries.Google Scholar
  23. OECD. 2015. Countering Harmful Tax Practices More Effectively, Taking into Account. Transparency and Substance, Action 5 – 2015 Final Report.Google Scholar
  24. OECD. 2017. Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax. Administrations, sec. 1.13.Google Scholar
  25. Quigley, Conor. 2016. Differential Tax Treatment, Tax Rulings and EU State Aid Law. In. Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS): Impact for European and International. Tax Policy, Robert Danon (ed.), 457–474. Geneva/Zurich: Schulthess.Google Scholar
  26. Robins, Nicole, and Sahar Shamsi. 2016. The European Commission’s State Aid Clampdown. The End of “Selective” Tax Rulings? Derivatives & Financial Instruments (18) 1.Google Scholar
  27. Rossi-Maccanico, Pierpaolo. 2016. Fiscal State Aids and BEPS: Navigating Troubled Waters. In Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS): Impact for European and International Tax Policy, Robert Danon (ed.), 475–508. Geneva/Zurich: Schulthess.Google Scholar
  28. Scotchmer, Suzanne, and Joel Slemrod. 1989. Randomness in Tax Enforcement. Journal of Public Economics 38: 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith, Adam. 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations.Google Scholar
  30. Sporken, C. J. Eduard A., and Yves. C. Cattel. 2015. Investigations by European Commission into Transfer Pricing Underlying Certain Tax Rulings in the European Union. International Transfer Pricing Journal (22) 3.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. Senate, Committee on Finance. 2016. Hatch, Wyden, Portman, Schumer Continue Push for Fairness in EU State Aid Investigations. https://www.finance.senate.gov/chairmans-news/hatch-wyden-portman-schumer-continue-push-for-fairness-in-eu-state-aid-investigations.
  32. U.S. Treasury. 2016. European Commission’s Recent State Aid Investigations of Transfer Pricing Ruling. https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/tax-policy/treaties/Documents/White-Paper-State-Aid.pdf.
  33. Vanistendael, Frans. 1996. Legal Framework for Taxation (Chap. 2). In Tax Law Design and Drafting, ed. Victor Thuronyi. Washington, DC: IMF.Google Scholar
  34. Waerzeggers, Christophe and Cory Hillier. 2016. Introducing an Advance Tax Ruling (ATR). Regime, Tax Law IMF Technical Note, Vol. 1, 02/2016.Google Scholar
  35. Waldron, Jeremy. 2008. The Concept and the Rule of Law. Public Law and Legal Theory. Research Paper Series, Working Paper No. 08–50. https://lsr.nellco.org/nyu_plltwp/481/.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vertex Inc.King of PrussiaUSA

Personalised recommendations