An Overview on Privacy Preservation and Public Auditing on Outsourced Cloud Data

  • Sonali D. KhambalkarEmail author
  • Shailesh D. Kamble
  • Nileshsingh V. Thakur
  • Nilesh U. Sambhe
  • Nikhil S. Mangrulkar
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 165)


Privacy preservation is the process of providing the solution for maintaining safety of outsourced data in cloud and the integrity of the outsourced data is checked with the help of public auditing. Outsourced cloud data offers big relief in terms of data storage in local machine, and security related to outsourced data is an important issue in the field of data management. This paper discusses the available encryption techniques to ensure privacy for a particular level in cloud. Based on the study of various literatures, no privacy preservation system is completely available in the present situation. The performance of available systems is evaluated based on security characteristics, that is, privacy, low computation cost, key exchange and management and so on. Still, there is a scope of improvement in designing a system to secure outsourced data storage with the help of privacy preservation and public auditing in terms of huge computation required to ensure integrity of data storage and reducing auditing time.


Privacy preservation Public auditing Cloud Outsourced data 


  1. 1.
    Chen, B., Curtmola, R., Ateniese, G., Burns, R.: Remote data checking for network coding-based distributed storage systems. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Workshop on Cloud Computing Security Workshop, pp. 31–42 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, H., Lee, P.: Enabling data integrity protection in regenerating coding- based cloud storage: Theory and implementation. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 25(2), 407–416 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dimakis, A.G., Ramchandran, K., Wu, Y., Suh, C.: A survey on network codes for distributed storage. Proc. IEEE 99(3), 476–489 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shacham, H., Waters, B.: Compact proofs of retrievability. In: Advances in Cryptology-ASIACRYPT 2008, pp. 90– 107. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hu, Y., Chen, H.C., Lee, P.P., Tang, Y.: Nccloud: applying network coding for the storage repair in a cloud-of-clouds. In: USENIX FAST (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Juels, A., Kaliski Jr, B.S.: Pors: proofs of retrievability for large files. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 584–597. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ateniese, G., Burns, R., Curtmola, R., Herring, J., Kissner, L., Peterson, Z., Song, D.: Provable data possession at untrusted stores. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS’07, pp. 598– 609. ACM, New York, USA (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yang, K., Jia, X.: An efficient and secure dynamic auditing protocol for data storage in cloud computing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 24(9), 1717–1726 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, C., Wang, Q., Ren, K., Lou, W.: Privacy-Preserving Public Auditing for Data Storage Security in Cloud Computing, pp. 1–9. INFOCOM, IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang, C., Wang, Q., Ren, K., Lou, W.: Towards secure and dependable storage services in cloud computing. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 5(2), 220–232 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I.: Above the clouds: a Berkeley view of cloud computing. In: Department of Electrical Engeering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, Rep. UCB/EECS, vol. 28, p. 13 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Curtmola, R., Khan, O., Burns, R., Ateniese, G.: Mr-pdp: multiple replica provable data possession. In: 28th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, ICDCS’08, pp. 411–420. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bowers, K.D., Juels, A., Oprea, A.: Hail: a high-availability and integrity layer for cloud storage. In: 16th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 187–198. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    He, J., Zhang, Y., Huang, G., Shi, Y., Cao, J.: Distributed data possession checking for securing multiple replicas in geographically dispersed clouds. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 78(5), 1345–1358 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu, Y., Hu, H., Ahn, G.-J., Yu, M.: Cooperative provable data possession for integrity verification in multi-cloud storage. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 23(12), 2231–2244 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, C., Chow, S.S., Wang, Q., Ren, K., Lou, W.: Privacy-preserving public auditing for secure cloud storage. IEEE Trans. Comput. 62(2),. 362–375 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boneh, D., Lynn, B., Shacham, H.: Short signatures from the weil pairing. J. Cyptology 17(4), 297–319 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boneh, D., Franklin, M.: Identity-based encryption from the weil pairing. In: Advances in Cryptology CRYPTO 2001, pp. 213–229. Springer, Berlin (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dimakis, A.G., Godfrey, P.B., Wu, Y., Wainwright, M.J., Ramchandran, K.: Network coding for distributed storage systems. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 56(9), 4539–4551 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ho, T., Medard, M., Koetter, R., Karger, D.R., Effros, M., Shi, J., Leong, B.: A random linear network coding approach to multicast. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 52(10), 4413–4430 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boneh, D., Freeman, D., Katz, J., Waters, B.: Signing a linear subspace: signature schemes for network coding. In: Public Key Cryptography–PKC 2009, pp. 68–87. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gennaro, R., Katz, J., Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Secure network coding over the integers. In: Public Key Cryptography–PKC 2010, pp. 142–160. Springer, Berlin (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Miyaji, A., Nakabayashi, M., Takano, S.: New explicit conditions of elliptic curve traces for FR-reduction. ICICE Trans. Fundam. Electron. Commun. Comput. Sci. 84(5), 1234–1243 (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Goldwasser, S., Micali, S., Rivest, R.: A digital signature scheme secure against adaptive chosen message attacks. SIAM J. Comput. 17(2), 281–308 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Worku, S.G., Xu, C., Zhao, J., He, X.: Secure and efficient privacy-preserving public auditing scheme for cloud storage. Comput. Electr. Eng. 40(5), 1703–1713 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Yeshwantrao Chavan College of EngineeringNagpurIndia
  2. 2.Nagpur Institute of TechnologyNagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations