Advertisement

Compressed Air Energy Storage Driven by Wind Power Plant for Water Desalination Through Reverse Osmosis Process

  • M. B. Hemanth KumarEmail author
  • B. Saravanan
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1048)

Abstract

The need for an increase in the freshwater has led to water desalination technologies and its advancements. The expenses arise for the reverse osmosis (RO) desalination system for all the energy consumption parties has led to the implementation of RO membranes. The renewable energy sources provide a non-combustible source due to depleting conventional energy sources. In this work wind power integrated with RO systems for providing clean water by utilizing sustainable energy resource with a compressed air energy storage is proposed. This investigates the accomplishment of compressed air energy storage through an RO membrane connected to pressure vessel based on solution diffusion concept. Here the energy storage will act as a buffer due to variation in the wind velocity. The performance is validated by varying: wind velocity, storage tank volume, and RO elements, pressure inside the tank and pressure limits. The compressed air energy storage is found to provide better water production and water quality compared with conventional RO system connected with wind alone. By maintaining initial pressure in the tank and lower pressure limit the salt rejection was achieved at 98.5%. This shows the effectiveness of compressed air energy storage in combination with wind energy conversion which is better suited for water desalination process with RO.

Keywords

Reverse osmosis Compressed air energy storage Desalination RO membrane Wind velocity 

References

  1. 1.
    Kumar, M.B.H., Saravanan, B.: Impact of global warming and other climatic condition for generation of wind energy and assessing the wind potential for future trends. In: 2017 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT), Vellore, pp. 1–5 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hemanth Kumar, M.B., Saravanan, B.: Power quality improvement for wind energy conversion system using composite observer controller with fuzzy logic. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. (IJISA), 10(10), 72–80 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Greenlee, L.F., Lawler, D.F., Freeman, B.D., Marrot, B., Moulin, P.: Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today’s challenges. Water Res. 43, 2317–2348 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Distefano, T., Kelly, S.: Are we in deep water? water scarcity and its limits to economic growth. Ecol. Econ. 142, 130–147 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Forstmeier, M., Mannerheim, F., D’Amato, F., Shah, M., Liu, Y., Baldea, M., Stella, A.: Feasibility study on wind-powered desalination. Desalination 203, 463–470 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Charcosset, C.: A review of membrane processes and renewable energies for desalination. Desalination 245, 214–231 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gilau, A.M., Small, M.J.: Designing cost-effective seawater reverse osmosis system under optimal energy options. Renew. Energy 33, 617–630 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kershman, S.A., Rheinländer, J., Neumann, T., Goebel, O.: Hybrid wind/PV and conventional power for desalination in Libya—GECOL’s facility for medium and small scale research at Ras Ejder. Desalination 183, 1–12 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hemanth Kumar, M.B.: An improved resonant fault current limiter for distribution system under transient conditions. Int. J. Renew. Energy Res. (IJRER) 7(2), 547–555 (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar, M.B.H., et al.: Review on control techniques and methodologies for maximum power extraction from wind energy systems. IET Renew. Power Gener. 12(14), 1609–1622 (2018)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eltawil, M.A., Zhengming, Z., Yuan, L.: A review of renewable energy technologies integrated with desalination systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 13, 2245–2262 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    El-Ghonemy, A.: Waste energy recovery in seawater reverse osmosis desalination plants. Part 2: case study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16, 4016–4028 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Madireddi, K., Babcock, R., Levine, B., Kim, J., Stenstrom, M.: An unsteady-state model to predict concentration polarization in commercial spiral wound membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 157, 13–34 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ganesh, C., Anupama, S., Hemanth Kumar, M.B.: Control of wind energy conversion system and power quality improvement in the sub rated region using extremum seeking. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Inform. (IJEEI) 4(1), 14–23 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Elimelech, M., Bhattacharjee, S.: A novel approach for modeling concentration polarization in crossflow membrane filtration based on the equiva lence of osmotic pressure model and filtration theory. J. Memb. Sci. 145, 223–241 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sassi, K.M., Mujtaba, I.M.: Simulation and optimization of full scale reverse osmosis desalination plant. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 28, 895–900 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electrical EngineeringVITVelloreIndia

Personalised recommendations