Advertisement

A Comparative Analysis of Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Regression for River Suspended Sediment Load Prediction

  • Barenya Bikash Hazarika
  • Deepak GuptaEmail author
  • Ashu
  • Mohanadhas Berlin
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1045)

Abstract

The artificial neural network (ANN) model and support vector regression (SVR) model have gained tremendous popularity among the researchers during the past couple of decades. Both of the models are very powerful in prediction and have several applications in different fields, which also include suspended sediment load prediction. In this work, the predictive capability of ANN and SVR model is investigated to estimate the daily suspended sediment load (SSL) in Tawang Chu River, Jang of Arunachal Pradesh, India. The performance of the models is evaluated using three quality measuring parameters, i.e., mean squared error (MSE), root-mean-square error (RMSE), and mean absolute error (MAE). From the experimental results, one can conclude that the predictive capability of SVR is better compared to ANN in terms of all of the quality measuring parameters.

Keywords

Artificial neural network Support vector regression Suspended sediment load Prediction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was fully supported by the Science and Engineering Research Board, Government of India (SERB), under early career research award ECR/2016/001464. We are also thankful to NHPC LIMITED, Tawang Basin Project to provide this data.

References

  1. 1.
    Vapnik, V.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin (2013)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagy, H.M., Watanabe, K.A., Hirano, M.: Prediction of sediment load concentration in rivers using artificial neural network model. J. Hydraul. Eng. 128(6), 588–595 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tayfur, G.: Artificial neural networks for sheet sediment transport. Hydrol. Sci. J. 47(6), 879–892 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raghuwanshi, N.S., Singh, R., Reddy, L.S.: Runoff and sediment yield modeling using artificial neural networks: Upper Siwane River, India. J. Hydrol. Eng. 11(1), 71–79 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cigizoglu, H.K.: Estimation and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data by multi-layer perceptrons. Adv. Water Resour. 27(2), 185–195 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Misra, D., Oommen, T., Agarwal, A., Mishra, S.K., Thompson, A.M.: Application and analysis of support vector machine based simulation for runoff and sediment yield. Biosys. Eng. 103(4), 527–535 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Botsis, D., Latinopulos, P., Diamantaras, K.: Rainfall-runoff modeling using support vector regression and artificial neural networks. In: 12th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology (CEST2011) on 2011, pp. 8–10Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oehler, F., Coco, G., Green, M.O., Bryan, K.R.: A data-driven approach to predict suspended-sediment reference concentration under non-breaking waves. Cont. Shelf Res. 46, 96–106 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kisi, O., Dailr, A.H., Cimen, M., Shiri, J.: Suspended sediment modeling using genetic programming and soft computing techniques. J. Hydrol. 450, 48–58 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lafdani, E.K., Nia, A.M., Ahmadi, A.: Daily suspended sediment load prediction using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. J. Hydrol. 478, 50–62 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adib, A., Mahmoodi, A.: Prediction of suspended sediment load using ANN GA conjunction model with Markov chain approach at flood conditions. KSCE J. Civil Eng. 21(1), 447–457 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khan, M.Y., Hasan, F, Tian, F.: Estimation of suspended sediment load using three neural network algorithms in Ramganga River catchment of Ganga Basin, India. Sustainable Water Resources Management, pp. 1–7 (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCulloch, W.S., Pitts, W.: A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull. Math. Biophys. 5(4), 115–133 (1943)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hopfield, J.J.: Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 79(8), 54–58 (1982). (Springer)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., Williams, R.J.: Learning internal representations by error propagation. California Univ. San Diego La Jolla Inst. for Cognitive Science on 1985. La JollaGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vapnik, V., Mukherjee, S.: Support vector method for multivariate density estimation. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems on 2000, pp. 659–665. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sharma, N., Zakaullah, M., Tiwari, H., Kumar, D.: Runoff and sediment yield modeling using ANN and support vector machines: a case study from Nepal watershed. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 1(3), 23 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barenya Bikash Hazarika
    • 1
  • Deepak Gupta
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ashu
    • 1
  • Mohanadhas Berlin
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute of Technology Arunachal PradeshYupiaIndia

Personalised recommendations