Advertisement

Community Development Through Sustainable Technology—A Proposed Study with Irula Tribe of Masinagudi and Ebbanad Villages of Nilgiri District

  • T. V. Rajeevan
  • S. RajendrakumarEmail author
  • Thangavel Senthilkumar
  • S. Udhaya Kumar
  • P. Subramaniam
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1045)

Abstract

Irulars are one among six Particularly Vulnerable Tribal Groups (PVTGs) of Tamil Nadu. In the study area, Masinagudi and Ebbanad villages, the Indigenous community dwells in thick forest region of Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary. In comparison with other PVTGs, Irula community of these regions are behind in development due to their remote location. They have very minimum basic amenities, nutritional deficiencies, high dropout rate in schools, low literacy rate, and often migrate to other places in search of better livelihood. It resulted in the community to face the vulnerable living conditions. Unemployment, indebtedness, inadequate healthcare and poor education facility for children are increasing problems of this community. Added to that, the practice of unsustainable agriculture, chemical utilization, contaminating the wildlife habitats and nearby environment. The increasing conflicts of animal–domestic animal and animals–human shows that Irula community is at risk. The present study focuses on development of Irulas community with appropriate sustainable technologies reviewing successful intervention from different aspects. The probability of implementation of successful intervention of appropriate sustainable technologies will be presented as framework to promote the Irula community of Masinagudi and Ebbanad village of Nilgiris district.

Keywords

Technology Sustainable Irula Masinagudi Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to render our gratitude to all the authorities in the Ministry of Tribal Affairs, GoI for the financial support (F.No.15025/5/2017-TRI), and the management of Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore for providing support during writing stage of this paper. We thank our project partner, Tribal Research Centre, Ooty and our project assistant Mr. P. Gunanithi who supported in field activities. Our sincere thanks to Dr. V.S. Ramchandran, Centre of Environmental Studies, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham for providing valuable feedback in final review of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Malecki, E.J.: Technology and economic development: the dynamics of local, regional, and national change. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoadley, C.M., Kilner, P.G.: Using technology to transform communities of practice into knowledge-building communities. SIGGROUP Bull. 25(1), 31–40 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Njunwa, K.M.: Community participation as a tool for development: local community’s participation in primary education development in Morogoro, Tanzania—a case of Kilkaland Mindu Primary Schools. Master thesis in Development Management, University of Agder (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    MoTA.: Report of the high level committee on socio economic, health and education status of tribal communities of India. Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Panduranga, R., Honnurswamy, N.: Status of scheduled tribes in India. Int. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Res. 2(4), 245–252 (2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Census, The Nilgiris District: Census 2011–2018 data. Directorate of Census Operations in Tamil Nadu. https://www.census2011.co.in/census/district/31-the-nilgiris.html, last accessed 2019/02/23
  7. 7.
    ADTWD: Policy Note 2018–2019. Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Government of Tamil Nadu (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gnanamoorthy, K.: Present situation of Irular—a primitive tribe. IOSR J. Econ. Financ. 6(1), 46–49 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lalsangpuii: The role of chieftainessess in the Mizo resistance movement the British (1800–1900). A doctoral thesis submitted to Assam University, Assam (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar, V., Bansal, A.: Information and communication technology for improving livelihoods of tribal community in India. Int. J. Comput. Eng. Sci. 3(5), 13–21 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Deogaonkar, S.G., Deogaonkar, L., Baxi: The Kolam Tribes. Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elizabeth, A.M., Saraswathy, K.N.: Thoti Tribes of Andhra Pradesh. Abhijeet Publication, New Delhi (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ramaiah, P.: Tribal economy in Telangana with special reference to the Warangal district (a case study). Doctoral thesis, Department of Economics, Kakatiya University, Warangal (1980)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bhowmic, P.K.: Dynamics of Tribal Development. Inter India Publication, New Delhi (1993)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Joshi, S., Singh, V.: Assessment of food related habits and customs of Bhill tribes of Udaipur district, Rajasthan. Food Sci. Res. J. 6(2), 333–340 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Suresh Lal, B.: Rural-urban migration of tribal labour: a case study of tribal rickshaw pullers in Warangal District. Master of philosophy. Dissertation, Department of Economics, Kakatiya University, Warangal (1995)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rajukkannu, K.: Anthropological of perspective tribes and inter ethnic relationship in the Nilgiris District. Int. J. Eng. Manag. Res. 5(5), 1–7 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    TRC, HADP.: Tribes & inter-ethnic relationship in The Nilgiri District, Tamil Nadu. Tribal Research Centre and Hill Area Development Programme, Udhagamandalam, The Nilgiris District, Tamil Nadu, (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    TRC: Scheduled tribes of Nilgiris district. Tribal Research Centre, The Nilgiris District, Udhagamandalam, Tamil Nadu (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rajendakumar, S., Senthil Kumar, T., Udhaya Kumar, S., Subramaniam, P., Rajeevan, T.V.: Technology inputs in promoting indigenous food recipes of Irula and Kurumba tribes and empowering disadvantaged youth of Masinagudi and Ebbanad Villages of The Nilgiris District. Progress Report-1 submitted to: Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India. Submitted by Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore and Tribal Research Centre, Ooty (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    TRC, Amrita: Technology inputs in promoting indigenous food recipes of Irulas and Kurumbas tribes and empowering disadvantaged youth of Masinagudi and Ebbanad village of The Nilgiri District. A final proposal submitted to Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India, New Delhi by Tribal Research Centre, Ooty and Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu (2017)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Selvam, P., Ezhumalai, R., Vijayargavan, A., Rajasekar, A., Samydurai, P., Aravindhan, V.: Herbal healing practices of Indigenous Irular tribal peoples of Sendurai Block at Ariyalur District, Tamil Nadu. Int. J. Appl. Pure Sci. Agric. 2(3), 196–202 (2016)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kumar, N.: A study on health status and perception of Illness among Irulas—Tribal people of Nilgiri District of Tamil Nadu. Imp. J. Interdiscip. Res. 3(3), 1208–1362 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saheb, S., Yaseen., Bhanu, B., Ananda.: Health, disease and morbidity among the Irular Tribe of Tamil Nadu. Afro Asian J. Anthropol. Soc. Policy 2(1), 17–28 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sianipar, C.P.M., Widaretna, K.: NGO as Triple-Helix axis: some lessons from Nias community empowerment on cocoa production. In: Proceedings of the Triple-Helix 10th International Conference (TH-10): Emerging Triple Helix Models for Developing Countries: From Conceptualization to Implementation; 190, p. 762 (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mensah, A.M., Castro, L.C.: Sustainable resource use and sustainable development a contradiction? Centre for Developmental Research, University of Bonn (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Upadhyaya, A., Sikka, A.K.: Concept of water, land and energy productivity in agriculture and pathways to improvement. Irrig. Drain. Syst. Eng. 5(1), 1–10 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Birthal, P.S.: Application of frontier technologies for agricultural development. Indian J. Agric. Econ. 68(1), 20–38 (2013)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Narayanamoorthy, A.: Averting water crisis by drip method of irrigation: a study of two water-intensive crops. Indian J. Agric. Econ. 58(3), 427–437 (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chel, A., Kaushik, G.: Renewable energy for sustainable agriculture. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 31, 91–118 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Morshedi, L., Lashgarara, F., Hosseini, F., Najafabadi, M.O.: The role of organic farming for improving food security from the perspective of far farmers. Sustainability 9, 1–13 (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    FAO: Can organic farmers produce enough food for everybody? Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online: http://www.fao.org/organicag/oa-faq/oa-faq7/en/. Last accessed 2019/02/23
  33. 33.
    Najafabadi, O.M.A.: Gender sensitive analysis towards organic agriculture: a structural equation modeling approach. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 27, 225–240 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Azadi, H., Schoonbeek, S., Mahmoudi, H., Derudder, B., De Maeyer, P., Witlox, F.: Organic agriculture and sustainable food production system: main potentials. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 144, 92–94 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ghadam, Z.M.H., Bazayeh, F.A.: Weed and pest management in organic farming. J. Agric. Sustain. Dev. 52, 34–44 (2013)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Silva, E.L.D.G.S., Oliveira, C.M.M., Mendes, A.B., Guerra, H.M.G.F.O.: Technology and innovation in agriculture: The Azores case study. Int. J. Interactive Mobile Technol. 11(5), 56–66 (2017)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gal, B., Gal, Y., Gelb, E.: Adoption of information technology for farm management, a case study. In: International Farm Management Congress on “Farming at the Edge”, Australia (2003)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    FAO: Success Stories on Information and Communication Technologies for Agriculture and Rural Development, 2nd edn. Food and Agricultural Organisation, Bangkok, Thailand (2015)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rahman, H., Karuppaiyan, R., Kishore, K., Denzongpa, R.: Traditional practices of ginger cultivation in Northeast India. Indian Tradit. Knowl. 8(1), 23–28 (2009)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    ICAR, Livelihood security of tribal farmer through organic ginger cultivation in Sikkim. Indian Council for Agricultural Research (ICAR), Ministry of Agricultural and Farmers Welfare. GoI. https://icar.org.in/content/livelihood-security-tribal-farmer-through-organic-ginger-cultivation-sikkim-0. Last accessed 2019/02/23
  41. 41.
    FAO: Sustainable Wildlife Management and Human-Wildlife Conflict. Food and Agricultural Organisation, Kaeslin (2015)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mishra, M.: Health status and disease in tribal dominated villages of Central India. Health Popul. Perspect. Issues 35(4), 157–172 (2012)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Agte, V.V., Chiplonkar, S.A., Tarwadi, K.V.: Factors influencing zinc status of apparently healthy infants. J. Am. College Nutr. 24, 334–341 (2005)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mittal, P.C., Srivastava, S.: Diet, nutritional status and food related traditions of Oraon tribes of New Mal (West Bengal), India. Int. Electron. J. Rural Remote Health Res. Educ. Pract. Policy 6, 385 (2006)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shah, T.: The knowledge vehicle (K-Yan): sustainable value creation by design. In: Practice and Progress in Social Design and Sustainability, pp. 216–236. IGI Global Publishers, USA (2019)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Nair, P.: Whose Public Action? Analyzing Inter-Sectoral Collaboration for Service Delivery: Identification of Programmes for Study in India. International Development Department, Economic and Social Research Council, Swindon (2007)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jha, J., Jhingran, D.: Elementary Education for the Poorest and Other Deprived Groups. Centre for Policy Research, New Delhi (2002)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    TNFD: Tribal Development. Tamil Nadu Forest Department, Government of Tamil Nadu. https://www.forests.tn.gov.in/pages/view/Tribal_Development_on-going. Last accessed 2019/02/23
  49. 49.
    STDD, Management of Career & Higher Education Aspirations of ST Students in 2018–19. State Tribal Development Department. Government of Kerala. http://www.stdd.kerala.gov.in/training-skill-development. Last accessed 2019/02/23
  50. 50.
    Wicklein, R.C.: Designing for appropriate technology in developing countries. Technol. Soc. 20, 371–375 (1998)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kasmel, A., Andersen., Pernille, T.: Measurement of community empowerment in three community programs in Rapla (Estonia). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 8, 799–817 (2011)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bharathi Dhevi, V.R., Bhooma Mani, B.D.: Demographic profile of selected Irular Tribes of Coimbatore District–Tamil Nadu. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 4(1), 1–8 (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social WorkAmrita Vishwa VidyapeethamCoimbatoreIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Sustainable Future, Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials ScienceAmrita Vishwa VidyapeethamCoimbatoreIndia
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringAmrita Vishwa VidyapeethamCoimbatoreIndia
  4. 4.Department of Tribal WelfareTribal Research CentreUdhagamandalamIndia

Personalised recommendations