Advertisement

The Response of Major Food Crops to Drought Stress: Physiological and Biochemical Responses

  • S. Bakht
  • K. Safdar
  • K. U. Khair
  • A. Fatima
  • A. Fayyaz
  • S. M. Ali
  • H. Munir
  • M. Farid
Chapter

Abstract

Prevailing conditions of the climate have had a drastic effect on global food security. Various types of stresses have been producing havoc by reducing crop production. One of the primary causes has been observed in the form of drought. Drought generally has various kinds of impacts on human life, but its main victim is food crops. A plant has specific defense systems to combat and stay unchanged in an environment with water stress, but this ability decreases as the lack of water increases for a long time. The average globular yields of these primary agricultural products are admirably purposeful by enactment of crop performance in millions of fields distributed transversely in series of management practices for soil and climatic regimes; even with the global food supply complications, here we illustrate some simple measures of most widely germinated crops based upon the location, temperature, and precipitation. The types of responses, like reactive oxygen species (ROS), root signaling. Antioxidant enzymes, photosynthesis, etc., discussed in the context will help us to understand the situation with more clarity. The possible mitigation measures are also discussed in detail. A plant may be mitigated at different levels including breeding progress in drought condition, cellular and molecular adaptations, or using supplemental irrigation practices. In this paper, authors have reviewed all the aspects that encapsulate drought stress and its response to major food crops.

Keywords

Drought stress Plant hormones Biochemical responses Physiochemical responses Morphological responses Food crops 

References

  1. Ahmed AH (2017) Impact of putrescine and 24-epibrassinolide on growth, yield and chemical constituents of cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) plant grown under drought stress conditions. Science 16(1):9–23Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez S, Marsh EL, Schroeder SG, Schachtman DP (2008) Metabolomic and proteomic changes in the xylem sap of maize under drought. Plant Cell Environ 31(3):325–340PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Anjum SA, Wang LC, Farooq M, Hussain M, Xue LL, Zou CM (2011a) Brassinolide application improves the drought tolerance in maize through modulation of enzymatic antioxidants and leaf gas exchange. J Agron Crop Sci 197(3):177–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anjum SA, Xie XY, Wang LC, Saleem MF, Man C, Lei W (2011b) Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. Afr J Agric Res 6(9):2026–2032Google Scholar
  5. Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55(1):373–399PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59:206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Asif M, Kamran A (2011) Plant breeding for water-limited environments. Crop Sci 51:2911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Asner GP, Brodrick PG, Anderson CB, Vaughn N, Knapp DE, Martin RE (2016) Progressive forest canopy water loss during the 2012–2015 California drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci 113(2):E249–E255PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Bahrun A, Jensen CR, Asch F, Mogensen VO (2002) Drought-induced changes in xylem pH, ionic composition, and ABA concentration act as early signals in field-grown maize (Zea mays L.). J Exp Bot 53(367):251–263PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Bartels D, Sunkar R (2005) Drought and salt tolerance in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24(1):23–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Becker D, Hoth S, Ache P, Wenkel S, Roelfsema MRG, Meyerhoff O et al (2003) Regulation of the ABA-sensitive Arabidopsis potassium channel gene GORK in response to water stress. FEBS Lett 554(1–2):119–126PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Benjamin JG, Nielsen DC (2006) Water deficit effects on root distribution of soybean, field pea and chickpea. Field Crop Res 97:248–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blokhina O, Fagerstedt KV (2010) Oxidative metabolism, ROS and NO under oxygen deprivation. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:359–373PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Blum A (1996) Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. In: Drought tolerance in higher plants: genetical, physiological and molecular biological analysis. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blum A (2018) Plant breeding for stress environmentsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blum A, Sinmena B, Ziv O (1980) An evaluation of seed and seedling drought tolerance screening tests in wheat. Euphytica 29:727–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bogeat-Triboulot MB, Brosche M, Renaut J, Jouve L, Le Thiec D, Fayyaz P et al (2007) Gradual soil water depletion results in reversible changes of gene expression, protein profiles, ecophysiology, and growth performance in Populus euphratica, a poplar growing in arid regions. Plant Physiol 143:876–892PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Boyer J (1980) Afternoon water deficits and grain yields in old and new soybean cultivars. Agron J 72:981–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilnyk E (2000) Response to abiotic stresses. In: Gruissem W, Buchannan B, Jones R (eds) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, MD, pp 1158–1249Google Scholar
  20. Brunner I, Herzog C, Dawes MA, Arend M, Sperisen C (2015) How tree roots respond to drought. Front Plant Sci 6:547PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Castleberry RM, Crum CW, Krull CF (1984) Genetic yield improvement of US maize cultivars under varying fertility and climatic environments. Crop Sci 24:33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Caverzan A, Casassola A, Brammer SP (2016) Antioxidant responses of wheat plants under stress. Genet Mol Biol 39(1):1–6PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chaves MM (1991) Effects of water deficits on carbon assimilation. J Exp Bot 42:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chaves M, Oliveira M (2004) Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. J Exp Bot 55:2365–2384PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought – from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30(3):239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chaves MM, Flexas J, Pinheiro C (2009) Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Ann Bot 103(4):551–560PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cornic G (2000) Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture – not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends Plant Sci 5:187–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cornic G, Fresneau C (2002) Photosynthetic carbon reduction and carbon oxidation cycles are the main electron sinks for photosystem II activity during a mild drought. Ann Bot 89(7):887–894PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Damiani E, Astolfi P, Carloni P, Stipa P, Greci L (2008) Antioxidants: how they work. In: Oxidants in biology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 251–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Daryanto S, Wang L, Jacinthe PA (2016) Global synthesis of drought effects on maize and wheat production. PLoS One 11:e0156362PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Davies WJ, Kudoyarova G, Hartung W (2005) Long-distance ABA signaling and its relation to other signaling pathways in the detection of soil drying and the mediation of the plant’s response to drought. J Plant Growth Regul 24(4):285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. De Leonardis AM, Petrarulo M, De Vita P, Mastrangelo AM (2012) Genetic and molecular aspects of plant response to drought in annual crop species. In: Advances in selected plant physiology aspects. InTech, RijekaGoogle Scholar
  33. Duan B, Yang Y, Lu Y, Korpelainen H, Berninger F, Li C (2007) Interactions between drought stress, ABA and genotypes in Picea asperata. J Exp Bot 58:3025–3036PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Duvick DN (1997) What is yield. Developing drought and low N-tolerant maize. CIMMYT, El Batan, pp 332–335Google Scholar
  35. Ennahli S, Earl HJ (2005) Physiological limitations to photosynthetic carbon assimilation in cotton under water stress. Crop Sci 45:2374–2382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009a) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. Agron Sustain Dev 29:185–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Farooq M, Wahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra SMA (2009b) Plant drought stress: effects, mechanisms and management. In: Sustainable agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 153–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Farooq M, Gogoi N, Barthakur S, Baroowa B, Bharadwaj N, Alghamdi SS, Siddique KHM (2017) Drought stress in grain legumes during reproduction and grain filling. J Agron Crop Sci 203(2):81–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Feng C, Stewart J (2003) A cDNA-AFLP profile of cotton genes in response to drought stress. AAES Research Services, pp 176–182Google Scholar
  40. Flexas J, Medrano H (2002) Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. Ann Bot 89(2):183–189PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G, Sharkey TD (2004a) Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol 6:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Flexas J, Bota J, Loreto F, Cornic G, Sharkey TD (2004b) Diffusive and metabolic limitations to photosynthesis under drought and salinity in C3 plants. Plant Biol 6(3):269–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gallé A, Haldimann P, Feller U (2007) Photosynthetic performance and water relations in young pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens) trees during drought stress and recovery. New Phytol 174:799–810PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Galmés J, Medrano H, Flexas J (2007) Photosynthetic limitations in response to water stress and recovery in Mediterranean plants with different growth forms. New Phytol 175:81–93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gao JP, Chao DY, Lin HX (2008) Toward understanding molecular mechanisms of abiotic stress responses in rice. Rice 1(1):36–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ge L-F, Chao D-Y, Shi M, Zhu M-Z, Gao J-P, Lin H-X (2008) Overexpression of the trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase gene OsTPP1 confers stress tolerance in rice and results in the activation of stress responsive genes. Planta 228:191–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gondim SMG, Bastos AVB, Peixoto LSA (2010) Áreas de atuação, atividades e abordagens teóricas do psicólogo brasileiro. O trabalho do psicólogo no Brasil:174–199Google Scholar
  48. Grams TEE, Koziolek C, Lautner S, Matyssek R, Fromm J (2007) Distinct roles of electric and hydraulic signals on the reaction of leaf gas exchange upon re-irrigation in Zea mays L. Plant Cell Environ 30:79–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hammer GL (2009) Can changes in canopy and/or root system architecture explain historical maize yield trends in the US corn belt? Crop Sci 49:299–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Harris D, Tripathi RS, Joshi A (2002) On-farm seed priming to improve crop establishment and yield in dry direct-seeded rice. In: Pandey S, Mortimer M, Wade L, Tuong TP, Lopes K, Hardy B (eds) Direct seeding: research strategies and opportunities. International Research Institute, Manila, pp 231–240Google Scholar
  51. He XJ, Hsu YF, Zhu S, Wierzbicki AT, Pontes O, Pikaard CS, Liu HL, Wang CS, Jin H, Zhu JK (2009) An effector of RNA-directed DNA methylation in Arabidopsis is an ARGONAUTE 4-and RNA-binding protein. Cell 137(3):498–508PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. He X, Chen Z, Wang J, Li W, Zhao J, Wu J, Wang Z, Chen X (2015) A sucrose: fructan-6-fructosyltransferase (6-SFT) gene from Psathyrostachys huashanica confers abiotic stress tolerance in tobacco. Gene 570:239–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Horváth E, Szalai G, Janda T (2007) Induction of abiotic stress tolerance by salicylic acid signaling. J Plant Growth Regul 26(3):290–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hussain M, Malik MA, Farooq M, Ashraf MY, Cheema MA (2008) Improving drought tolerance by exogenous application of glycinebetaine and salicylic acid in sunflower. J Agron Crop Sci 194:193–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Working Group II (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Iqbal MK (2013) Inducing drought tolerance in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), accomplishments and future prospects. World Appl Sci J 21(7):1062–1069Google Scholar
  57. Jefferies RA (1995) Physiology of crop response to drought. In: Potato ecology and modelling of crops under conditions limiting growth. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Johnson DA, Asay KH (1993) Viewpoint–selection for improved drought response in cool-season grasses. J Range Manag 46:194–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Johnson CC, Barron EJ, Kauffman EG, Arthur MA, Fawcett PJ, Yasuda MK (1996) Middle cretaceous reef collapse linked to ocean heat transport. Geology 24(4):376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kamara AY, Kling JG, Menkir A, Ibikunle O (2003) Agronomic performance of maize (Zea mays L.) breeding lines derived from a low nitrogen maize population. J Agric Sci 141(2):221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kao YT (2014) Vygotsky’s theory of instruction and assessment: the implications on foreign language education. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  62. Khan MB, Hussain N, Iqbal M (2001) Effect of water stress on growth and yield components of maize variety YHS 202. J Res (Science) 12:15–18Google Scholar
  63. Lobell DB (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319:607–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lobell DB, Field CB (2007) Global scale climate–crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett 2(1):014002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Luquet D, Vidal A, Smith M, Dauzat J (2005) ‘More crop per drop’: how to make it acceptable for farmers? Agric Water Manag 76:108–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. MacKerron DKL, Jefferies RA (1985) Observations on the effects of the relief of late water stress in potato. Potato Res 28:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Manavalan LP, Guttikonda SK, Phan Tran LS, Nguyen HT (2009) Physiological and molecular approaches to improve drought resistance in soybean. Plant Cell Physiol 50(7):1260–1276PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Manivannan P, Abdul Jaleel C, Sankar B, Kishorekumar A, Somasundaram R, Lakshmanan GMA, Panneerselvam R (2007) Growth, biochemical modifications and proline metabolism in Helianthus annuus L. as induced by drought stress. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces 59(2):141–149PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Marengo JA, Torres RR, Alves LM (2017) Drought in Northeast Brazil—past, present, and future. Theor Appl Climatol 129(3–4):1189–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mauzerall D (1976) Chlorophyll and photosynthesis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 273(924):287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Medrano H, Escalona JM, Bota J, Gulias J, Flexas J (2002) Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. Ann Bot 89(7):895–905PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Meyer R, Boyer J (1972) Sensitivity of cell division and cell elongation to low water potentials in soybean hypocotyls. Planta 108:77–87PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Mian SA (1994) US university-sponsored technology incubators: an overview of management, policies and performance. Technovation 14(8):515–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Mittler R (2002) Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 7(9):405–410PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. Møller IM, Jensen PE, Hansson A (2007) Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58(1):459–481PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Moran MS, Clarke TR, Inoue Y, Vidal A (1994) Estimating crop water deficit using the relation between surface-air temperature and spectral vegetation index. Remote Sens Environ 49(3):246–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Mor A, Koh E, Weiner L, Rosenwasser S, Sibony-Benyamini H, Fluhr R (2014) Singlet oxygen signatures are detected independent of light or chloroplasts in response to multiple stresses. Plant Physiol 165:249–261PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Munné-Bosch SAL (2004) Die and let live: leaf senescence contributes to plant survival under drought stress. Funct Plant Biol 31(3):203–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Nam NH, Subbaroa GV, Chauhan YS, Johansen C (1998) Importance of canopy attributes in determining dry matter accumulation of pigeon pea under contrasting moisture regimes. Crop Sci 38:955–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Nikolaeva MK, Maevskaya SN, Shugaev AG, Bukhov NG (2010) Effect of drought on chlorophyll content and antioxidant enzyme activities in leaves of three wheat cultivars varying in productivity. Russ J Plant Physiol 57(1):87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Nishiyama R, Watanabe Y, Fujita Y, Le DT, Kojima M, Werner T et al (2011) Analysis of cytokinin mutants and regulation of cytokinin metabolic genes reveals important regulatory roles of cytokinins in drought, salt and abscisic acid responses, and abscisic acid biosynthesis. Plant Cell 23(6):2169–2183PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Nonami H (1998) Plant water relations and control of cell elongation at low water potentials. J Plant Res 111:373–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Oosterhuis DM (1987) Osmotic adjustment in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) leaves and roots in response to water stress. Plant Physiol 84:1154–1157PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Ostad-Ali-Askari K, Shayannejad M, Eslamian S (2017) Deficit irrigation: optimization models. Management of Drought and Water Scarcity. Handbook of Drought and Water ScarcityGoogle Scholar
  85. Oweis T (1997) Supplemental irrigation: a highly efficient water-use practiceGoogle Scholar
  86. Pamplona R, Costantini D (2011) Molecular and structural antioxidant defenses against oxidative stress in animals. Am J Phys Regul Integr Comp Phys 301:R843–R863Google Scholar
  87. Peacock JM, Miller WB, Matsuda K, Robinson DL (1990) Role of heat girdling in early seedling death of sorghum. Crop Sci 30:138–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Peleg ZBE (2011) Hormone balance and abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 14(3):290–295PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. Praba ML, Cairns JE, Babu RC, Lafitte HR (2009) Identification of physiological traits underlying cultivar differences in drought tolerance in rice and wheat. J Agron Crop Sci 195:30–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Roy M, Wu R (2002) Overexpression of S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase gene in rice increases polyamine level and enhances sodium chloride-stress tolerance. Plant Sci 163(5):987–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rucker KS, Kvien CK, Holbrook CC, Hook JE (1995) Identification of peanut genotypes with improved drought avoidance traits. Peanut Sci 24:14–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Salekdeh GH (2009) Conceptual framework for drought phenotyping during molecular breeding. Trends Plant Sci 14:488–496PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  93. Salter PJ, Goode JE (1967) Crop responses to water at different stages of growth, Research Reviews 2. Commonwealth Bureau of Horticulture, East Mailing, p 97Google Scholar
  94. Sauter A, Davies WJ, Hartung W (2001) The long-distance abscisic acid signal in the droughted plant: the fate of the hormone on its way from root to shoot. J Exp Bot 52:1991–1997PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Schachtman DP, Goodger JQ (2008) Chemical root to shoot signaling under drought. Trends Plant Sci 13(6):281–287PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Serraj R, Sinclair TR (2002) Osmolyte accumulation: can it really help increase crop yield under drought conditions? Plant Cell Environ 25:333–341PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. Serrano R, Mulet JM, Rios G, Marquez JA, de Larrinoa IF, Leube MP, Mendizabal I, Pascual-Ahuir A, Proft M, Ros R, Montesinos C (1999) A glimpse of the mechanisms of ion homeostasis during salt stress. J Exp Bot 50(Special_Issue):1023–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Shah M, Steinberg BM (2017) Drought of opportunities: contemporaneous and long-term impacts of rainfall shocks on human capital. J Polit Econ 125(2):527–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Shao HB, Chu LY, Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Panneerselvam R, Shao MA (2009) Understanding water deficit stress-induced changes in the basic metabolism of higher plants-biotechnologically and sustainably improving agriculture and the ecoenvironment in arid regions of the globe. Crit Rev Biotechnol 29:131–151PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. Shearman V, Sylvester-Bradley R, Scott RK, Foulkes MJ (2005) Physiological processes associated with wheat yield progress in the UK. Crop Sci 45:175–185Google Scholar
  101. Shi J, Gao H, Wang H, Lafitte HR, Archibald RL, Yang M et al (2017) ARGOS8 variants generated by CRISPR-Cas9 improve maize grain yield under field drought stress conditions. Plant Biotechnol J 15(2):207–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Sofo A, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C, Masia A (2004) Effects of different irradiance levels on some antioxidant enzymes and on malondialdehyde content during rewatering in the olive tree. Plant Sci 166:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Su J, Wu R (2004) Stress-inducible synthesis of proline in transgenic rice confers faster growth under stress conditions than that with constitutive synthesis. Plant Sci 166(4):941–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Todorova DT (2016) Polyamines and brassinosteroids in drought stress responses and tolerance in plants. In: Water stress and crop plants: a sustainable approach. Wiley, Chichester, pp 608–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Turner MG (1989) Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20(1):171–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tuteja N, Gill SS (eds) (2013) Climate change and plant abiotic stress tolerance. Wiley, Hoboken. ISBN 978-3-527-33491-9 (1,2)Google Scholar
  107. Ubaidillah M, Safitri FA, Hussain A, Mun B-G, Yun B-W, Kim K-M, Jo J-H, Lee S-K, Chung IK (2016) Roles of plant hormones and anti-apoptosis genes during drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). 3 Biotech 6:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Valipour M (2016) Optimization of neural networks for precipitation analysis in a humid region to detect drought and wet year alarms. Meteorol Appl 23(1):91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Van Loon AF, Gleeson T, Clark J, Van Dijk AI, Stahl K, Hannaford J et al (2016) Drought in the Anthropocene. Nat Geosci 9(2):89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Vurukonda SS (2016) Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 184:13–24PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  111. Wang CYA (2008) Influence of water stress on endogenous hormone contents and cell damage of maize seedlings. J Integr Plant Biol 50(4):427–434PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  112. Wang WX, Barak T, Vinocur B, Shoseyov O, Altman A (2003) Abiotic resistance and chaperones: possible physiological role of SP1, Astable and stabilizing protein from Populus. In: Vasil IK (ed) Plantbiotechnology 2000 and beyond. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 439–443Google Scholar
  113. Wilkinson L (2012) The grammar of graphics. In: Handbook of computational statistics. Springer, Berlin, pp 375–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wilkinson S, Davies W (2010) Drought, ozone, ABA and ethylene: new insights from cell to plant to community. Plant Cell Environ 33(4):510–525PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  115. Wolchover IN (2018) “What is a Drought?” live science. Accessed 27 Mar 2019Google Scholar
  116. Xu W, Yang H, Liu Y, Yang Y, Wang P, Kim S-H, Ito S, Yang C, Wang P, Xiao M-T, Liu L-x, Jiang W-q, Liu J, Zhang J-y, Wang B, Frye S, Zhang Y, Xu Y-h, Lei Q-y, Guan K-L, Zhao S-m, Xiong Y (2011) Oncometabolite 2-Hydroxyglutarate is a competitive inhibitor of α-Ketoglutarate-dependent Dioxygenases. Cancer Cell 19(1):17–30PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Yadav RS, Hash CT, Bidinger FR, Devos KM, Howarth CJ (2004) Genomic regions associated with grain yield and aspects of post flowering drought tolerance in pearl millet across environments and tester background. Euphytica 136:265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Yu LH, Wu SJ, Peng YS, Liu RN, Chen X, Zhao P, Xu P, Zhu JB, Jiao GL, Pei Y, Xiang CB (2016) Arabidopsis EDT 1/HDG 11 improves drought and salt tolerance in cotton and poplar and increases cotton yield in the field. Plant Biotechnol J 14(1):72–84PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  119. Zhao TJ, Sun S, Liu Y, Liu JM, Liu Q, Yan YB, Zhou HM (2006) Regulating the drought-responsive element (DRE)-mediated signaling pathway by synergic functions of trans-active and transinactive DRE binding factors in Brassica napus. J Biol Chem 281:10752–10,759PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  120. Zhu JK (2002) Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 53(1):247–273PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Zorov DB (2014) Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release. Physiol Rev 94:909–950PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Bakht
    • 1
  • K. Safdar
    • 1
  • K. U. Khair
    • 1
  • A. Fatima
    • 1
  • A. Fayyaz
    • 1
  • S. M. Ali
    • 1
  • H. Munir
    • 1
  • M. Farid
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental SciencesUniversity of GujratGujratPakistan

Personalised recommendations