Advertisement

Wave-in-Deck Force on Fixed Jacket Platforms by Silhoutte Method and Detailed Component Method

  • L. A. PangestuEmail author
  • C. Y. Ng
  • A. E. Kajuputra
  • M. K. Muzammil
  • S. Sabtu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Wave-in-deck creates extra forces to the platform by increasing its moment arm which cause instability in terms of overturning. Fixed offshore platforms are generally not intended to withstand the substantial forces produced by wave-in-deck loads. Nonetheless, the requirement to accurately predict the magnitude of wave-in-deck forces and the platform global response of a jacket platforms in regards to current engineering knowledge and variance jacket platforms configuration remains limited. The research aims to compare API procedure, i.e. the silhouette method for predicting wave-in-deck force with detailed component method. Simulation study has been carried out and evaluate the wave-in-deck forces on two fixed jacket platforms installed in South China Sea using SESAM Software (GeniE and USFOS) by DNV GL and to quantify wave forces and the effect of wave-in-deck in terms of RSR on the jacket platforms. The results indicate that detailed component method has smaller reduction of RSR for platform A by 2.65% and platform B by 9.25% whereas silhouette method’s reduction by 18.58% and 32.91% respectively.

Keywords

Wave-in-deck Fixed offshore platform Ocean wave-structure interactions Silhouette method Detailed component method RSR Reserve strength ratio Airgap Pushover analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Raaij KV (2005) Dynamic behaviour of jackets exposed to wave-in-deck forces. PhD Thesis in Mechanical and Structure Engineering and Material Science. Stavanger, Norway, University of StavangerGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kurian VJ, Voon MC, Wahab MMA, Liew MS (2014) System reliability assessment of existing jacket platforms in Malaysian waters. Res J Appl Sci Eng Tech 8(23):2305–2314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    API (2007) Recommended practice for planning, designing and constructing fixed offshore platforms–working stress design, 2A-WSD, 2007. American Petroleum InstituteGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murray JJ, Kaplan P (1995) Experimental and analytical studies of wave impact forces on ekofisk platform structures. In: Proceedings of Offshore Technology Conference, Paper No. 7782Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Raaij K, Gudmestad OT (2007) Wave-in-deck loading on fixed steel jacket decks. Mar Struct 20(3):164–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Golafshani AA, Bagheri V, Ebrahimian H, Holmas T (2011) Incremental wave analysis and its application to performance-based assessment of jacket platforms. J Constr Steel Res 67(10):1649–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Suyuthi A, Haver SK (2009) Extreme loads due to wave breaking against platform column. In: The nineteenth international offshore and polar engineering conference. International society of offshore and polar engineersGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scharnke J, Vestbøstad T, de Wilde J, Haver, S (2014) Wave-in-deck impact load measurements on a fixed platform deck. In: ASME 2014 33rd international conference on ocean, offshore and arctic engineering. American society of mechanical engineers digital collectionGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim J, Jang H, Izarra R, Martin D, Dalane O (2014, May) CFD-FE simulation of wave slamming on an offshore platform in extreme sea states. In: Offshore technology conference. Offshore technology conferenceGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaplan P, Murray JJ, Yu WC (1995) Theoretical analysis of wave impact forces on platform deck structures. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering (OMAE). Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pawsey S, Driver D, Gebara J, Bole J, Westlake H (1998) Characterization of environmental loads on subsiding offshore platforms. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on offshore mechanics and arctic engineering (OMAE). Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO (2007) ISO 19902:2007. Petroleum and natural gas industries–Fixed steel offshore structures. British StandardsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    DNV (2000) Environmental conditions and environmental loads. Oslo, NorwayGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. A. Pangestu
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. Y. Ng
    • 1
  • A. E. Kajuputra
    • 2
  • M. K. Muzammil
    • 1
  • S. Sabtu
    • 1
  1. 1.Universiti Teknologi PETRONASSeri IskandarMalaysia
  2. 2.PETRONAS Global Technical SolutionsKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations