Towards One Agricultural Market in India: Does the ICT Help?

  • Nilabja GhoshEmail author
  • Mayanglambam Rajeshwor
  • Parmeet Kumar Vinit


The current phase of economic reforms in agriculture is oriented to help farmers reach out to a larger all India market in order to fetch the best prices and earn higher incomes. The government has already been relaxing regulations to clean the market of imperfections and improve its efficiency, but moving towards ‘one’ Indian market has become a more targeted objective of reforms. The paper reviews the fast-changing scenario of institutional reforms and application of ICT as a facilitator of reforms. Empirical analysis with data on pulses reveals a convergence of prices in states towards a national-level price enabled by information flow from major markets but cannot confirm the role of trade in equalizing prices nor the benefit of higher prices reaching the producers. This transition period still shows signs of selective market integration and asymmetrical market responses mostly observed in consuming states.



The authors thank Dr. Sangeeta Chakravarty, Institute of Economic Growth, Delhi, for her advice on the empirical analysis.


  1. Acharya, S. S. (2004). State of the Indian farmer: A millennium study. Agricultural Marketing, Department of Agricultural and Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, and Academic Foundation, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmed, M., & Singla, N. (2017). Market integration and price transmission in major onion markets of India. Economic Affairs, 62(3), 405–417.Google Scholar
  3. Andrews, E. (2013). Who invented the internet? History News.
  4. Atkin, D. (2013). Trade, tastes, and nutrition in India. American Economic Review, 103(5), 1629–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balassa, B. (1964). The purchasing power parity doctrine: A reappraisal. Journal of Political Economy, 72(1964), 584–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bathla, S. (2008). Agriculture reforms and market integration: A spatial analysis of food and non-food commodities. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 10(2), 196–221.Google Scholar
  7. Bekker, E., Francois, J., & Manchin, M. (2012). Import prices, income and inequality. Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Vienna. WIIW Working Paper No. 82, June.Google Scholar
  8. Blyn, G. (1973). Price series correlation as a measure of market integration II. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 28(2).Google Scholar
  9. Business Line (BL) (2019). Just 14% of farmers registered on eNAM platform. July, 10.
  10. Chand, R. (2016). E-platform for national agricultural market. Economic & Political Weekly, 51(28), 15–18.Google Scholar
  11. Chatterjee, S., & Kapur, D. (2016). Understanding price variation in agricultural commodities in India: MSP, government procurement, and agriculture markets. India Policy Forum, July 12–13, National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi.Google Scholar
  12. Crouhy-Veyrac, L., Crouhy, M., & Melitz, J. (1981). More about the law of one price. European Economic Review, 18, 325–344 (North-Holland Publishing Company).Google Scholar
  13. Cummings, W. (1967). Pricing efficiency in Indian wheat market. New Delhi: Impact of India.Google Scholar
  14. Darne, O. (2004). Seasonal cointegration for monthly data. Economics Letters, 82, 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deaton, A., & Dupriez, O. (2011). Spatial price differences within large countries. Working Paper No. 1321, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Research Program in Development Studies, Princeton University, Princeton NJ, and World Bank, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  16. Directorate of Economics and Statistics (DES) (Website). Government of India Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare.
  17. Enke, S. (1951). Equilibrium among spatially separated markets: Solution by electronic analogue. Econometrica, 10, 40–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Feenstra, R., & Romalis, J. (2014). International prices and endogenous quality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(2), 477–527.Google Scholar
  19. Franses, P. H. (1991). Seasonality, nonstationary and the forecasting of monthly time series. International Journal of Forecasting, 7, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghosh, N. (2013). India’s agricultural marketing—Market reforms and the emergence of new channels. India: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Ghosh, N., & Guha Khasnobis, B. (2008). Measuring the efficacy of targeted public programmes: Public works programmes in India. In B. Guha Khasnobis, S. S. Acharya, & B. Davis (Eds.), Food security indicators, measurement, and the impact of trade openness (ICSSR, UNU-WIDER and FAO). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Gonzalez-Rivera, G., & Helfand, S. (2001). The extent, pattern, and degree of market integration: A multivariate approach for the Brazilian rice market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 576–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gonzalo, J., & Granger, C. (1995). Estimation of common long-memory components in cointegrated systems. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 1–9.Google Scholar
  24. Goodwin, B. K. (1992). Multivariate cointegration tests and the law of one price in international wheat markets. Review of Agricultural Economics, 14(1), 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodwin, B. K., Grennes, T. J., & Wohlenant, M. K. (1990). A revised test of the law of one price using rational price expectations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 682–693.Google Scholar
  26. Gupta, R. P. (1973). Agricultural prices in a backward economy. New Delhi: National Publishing House.Google Scholar
  27. Hallak, J. C., & Schott, P. K. (2011). Estimating cross-country differences in product quality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 417–474.Google Scholar
  28. Harriss, B. (1979). There is method in my madness: Or is it vice versa? Measuring agricultural market performance. Food Research Institute Studies, 17(2).Google Scholar
  29. Hurd, J. II. (1975). Railways and the expansion of markets in India, 1861–1921. Explorations in Economic History, 12(3), 263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2–3), 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johansen, S., & Schaumburg, E. (1999). Likelihood analysis of seasonal cointegration. Journal of Econometrics, 88, 301–339.Google Scholar
  32. Kahlon, A. S. (1991). Agricultural price policy and terms of trade. In M. L. Dantwala (Ed.), Indian agricultural development since independence. New Delhi: Oxford and IBH.Google Scholar
  33. Kainth, G. S. (1982). Foodgrains marketing system in India—Its structure and performance. New Delhi: Associated Publishing House.Google Scholar
  34. Kumar, P., & Sharma, R. K. (2000). Market integration and market efficiency of wheat in Haryana. Indian Journal of Quantitative Economics, 15(1&2), 90.Google Scholar
  35. Lele, U. J. (1967). Market integration: A study of sorghum prices in western India. Journal of Farm Economics, 49, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lele, U. J. (1971). Food grain marketing in India: Private performance and public policy. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Li, C., & Gibson, J. (2014). Spatial price differences and inequality in the People’s Republic of China: Housing market evidence. Asian Development Review, 31(1), 92–120.Google Scholar
  38. Melchior, A. (2016). Food price differences across Indian states: Pattern and determinants. NUPI Working paper 869, Norwegian Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  39. Ministry of Agriculture (MoA). (2013). Final report of the Committee of State Ministers Incharge of Agricultural Marketing Reforms. Department of Agriculture and Co-operation, Government of India.Google Scholar
  40. Ministry of Communications (MoC). (2018). Telecom statistics India-2018. Economics Research Unit—Statistics, Department of Telecommunications, Government of India New Delhi.Google Scholar
  41. MoA&FW (Various). Agricultural statistics at a glance. Government of India Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare, Directorate of Economics and Statistics.Google Scholar
  42. MoA&FW (Website). Price support scheme (PSS): The operational guidelines. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India.
  43. NABARD. (2018). NABARAD All India Rural Financial Inclusion Survey 2016–17. Department of Economic Analysis & Research, Mumbai.Google Scholar
  44. Naoroji, D. (1901). Poverty and un-British rule in India. S. Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
  45. Palaskas, T. B., & Harriss White, B. (1993). Testing market integration: New approaches with case material from the West Bengal. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, FAO.Google Scholar
  46. Press Information Bureau (PIB). (2017a). Price stabilization fund. Government of India Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, 28th March.
  47. Press Information Bureau (PIB). (2017b). Small farmers agri-business consortium. Government of India, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, 8th August
  48. Ravallion, M. (1986). Testing market integration. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 68(1), 102–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reddy, R., & Rajshekhar, M. (2014). Farmers should get access to larger markets to get benefits of APMC reform. The Economic Times, January 06.Google Scholar
  50. Samuelson, P. A. (1952). Spatial price equilibrium and linear programming. American Economic Review, 42, 283–303.Google Scholar
  51. Samuelson, P. A. (1964). Theoretical notes on trade problems. The Review of Economic and Statistics, 46(2), 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Scroll. (2019). New soil study confirms 1943 Bengal famine was caused by Winston Churchill’s policies, not drought. Scroll, March 30.
  53. Sen, A. (1981). Poverty and famines: An essay on entitlement and deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  54. Shalendra, Gummagolmath, K. C., & Sharma, P. (2011). ICT initiatives in Indian agriculture—An overview. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3), 489–497.Google Scholar
  55. Shrestha, R. B., Huang, W.-C., & Ghimire, R. (2014). Market price cointegration of tomato: Effects to nepalese farmers. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), 2(2), 1–10 (Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance).Google Scholar
  56. Singh, S., Singh, K. N., Gurang, V., Shekhawat, R. S., Panotra, N., & Singh, A. (2018). Cointegration and causality analysis of Tur (Pigeon pea) in neighboring states. International Journal of Chemical Studies, 6(3), 715–719.Google Scholar
  57. Sweeney, S. (2008). Indian railways and famine 1875–1914: Magic wheels and empty stomachs. The Economic and Business History Society, 26.
  58. Takayama, T., & Judge, G. G. (1971). Spatial and temporal price and allocation models. North-Holland, Amsterdam: Netherlands Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  59. Wilson, E. J. (2001). Testing agricultural market integration: Further conceptual and empirical considerations using Indian wholesale prices. In S. S. Acharya & D. P. Chaudhary (Eds.), Indian agricultural policy—At the crossroads (pp. 213–246). Jaipur, India: Rawat Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nilabja Ghosh
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mayanglambam Rajeshwor
    • 1
  • Parmeet Kumar Vinit
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Economic GrowthDelhiIndia
  2. 2.Agro-Economic Research Centre, Delhi UniversityDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations