Dynamic Game Analysis of Technology Diffusion and Innovation Performance: Case Study of China’s Automotive Industry

  • Shenglan LiEmail author
  • Yun Zhang
  • Rui Feng
Part of the Research Series on the Chinese Dream and China’s Development Path book series (RSCDCDP)


Automobile groups in China have two survival modes: joint venture with multinational corporations or independent development. Based on the three-stage dynamic game model, this paper studies the relationship between the technology diffusion from the transnational automobile group in the process of joint venture and the technology innovation and the R&D strategies of Chinese and foreign sides, as well as how technology diffusion can influence the competition between domestic brands and joint venture brands and the development of domestic enterprises independent innovation? The model reveals the delicate relationship between technology diffusion, innovation performance and technology development of the automotive industry. The conclusions drawn can be well supported by what is happening in the real world, they can develop and supplement the research of international technology diffusion and provide reference for the formulation of automotive industry policies and the developmental strategies of automobile enterprises.


Automotive industry R&D Technology diffusion Innovation performance Game 


  1. Aitken, Brian and Ann Harrison. “Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment? Evidence from Venezuela,” Amer Econ. Rev. 1999, 89:3, pp. 605–18.Google Scholar
  2. Coe, D. E, E. Helpman, and A. Hoffmaister. North- South R&D Spillovers [J]. Economic Journal, 1997, (107): 134–149.Google Scholar
  3. Dapeng Cai and Jie Li, Quid pro quo and the enforcement of intellectual property rights protection: a bargaining approach [J], The Journal of International Trade&Economic Development, 2011, pp:1–18.Google Scholar
  4. Eaton, Jonathan; Eva Gutierrez and Samuel Kortum. “Technology, Geography, and Trade,” Econometrica 2002, 70:5, pp. 1741–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eaton, J and S Kortum. Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD [J]. Journal of International Economics, 1996, (40): 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eaton, J and S Kortum. International Patenting and Technology Diffusion: Theory and Measurement [J]. International Economic Review, 1999, (40): 537–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grossman, Gene and Elhanan Helpman. Innovation and Growth in the World Economy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 1991.Google Scholar
  8. He Jie, Further Accurate Quantification of the Spillover Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on China’s Industrial Sector, The Journal of World Economy, 2000(12), pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
  9. James R. Markusen, Keith E. Maskus. Discriminating Among Alternative Theories of the Multinational Enterprise, Review of international Economics, 2002, Volume 10, Issue 4, pages 694–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keller W. Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion [J]. American Economic Review, 2001b, (92): 120–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keller, Wolfgang and Stephen Yeaple. “Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm Level Evidence from the United States,” IMF work. 2003. Pap. 248.Google Scholar
  12. Li Ping, Analysis of Spillover Effects in Technology diffusion, Nankai Journal (Philosophy, Literature and Social Science Edition), 1999(8), pp. 28–33.Google Scholar
  13. MARIN A, BELL M. Technology spillovers from foreign direct investment(FDI): the active role of MNC subsidiaries in Argentina in the 1990s[J]. Journal of Development Studies, 2006, 42(4): 678–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. QI J, LI H. Spillover effect of FDI on China knowledge creation[J]. Chinese Management Studies, 2008, 2(2): 86–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rachel Griffith, Stephen Redding, and Helen Simpson. Foreign Ownership and Productivity: New Evidence from the Service Sector and the R&D Lab Oxford[J]. Review of Economic Policy, 2003, Volume20, Issue3, Pp. 440–456.Google Scholar
  16. Rivera-Batiz, Luis and Paul Romer. “Economic Integration and Endogenous Growth,” Quart. J. Econ. 1991.106:2, pp. 531–55.Google Scholar
  17. Wolfgang Keller. “International Technology Diffusion”, Journal of Economic Literature, 2004, Vol. 42, No. 3(Sep., 2004), pp. 752–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yung-Whee Rhee, Bruce Ross-Larson, and Garry Pursell, Korea’s competitive edge: Managing the entry into world markets, 1984, p 163, Published for the World Bank [by] the Johns Hopkins University Press (Baltimore, Md.).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Social Sciences Academic Press 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lingnan CollegeSun Yat-Sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations