Advertisement

Recent Advances in Glaucoma Diagnostics

  • Parul Ichhpujani
Chapter
Part of the Current Practices in Ophthalmology book series (CUPROP)

Abstract

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. Active clinical research has enhanced our understanding of pathogenesis of glaucoma as well as added promising treatment options. In this chapter, we discuss the recent trends in diagnostic modalities.

References

  1. 1.
    Strouthidis NG, Chandrasekharan G, Diamond JP, et al. Teleglaucoma: ready to go? Br J Ophthalmol. 2014;98:1605–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demeng L, Niansong M, Zhaofeng Z. An ultralow power wireless intraocular pressure monitoring system. J Semicond. 2014;35:105014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Araci IE, Su B, Quake SR, Mandel Y. An implantable microfluidic device for self-monitoring of intraocular pressure. Nat Med. 2014;20:1074–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mansouri K. The road ahead to continuous 24-hour intraocular pressure monitoring in glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014;9:260–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Molaei A, Karamzadeh V, Safi S, Esfandiari H, Dargahi J, Khosravi MA. Upcoming methods and specifications of continuous intraocular pressure monitoring systems for glaucoma. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2018;13(1):66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dunbar GE, Shen BY, Aref AA. The Sensimed Triggerfish contact lens sensor: efficacy, safety, and patient perspectives. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:875–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mariacher S, Ebner M, Hurst J, et al. Implantation and testing of a novel episcleral pressure transducer: a new approach to telemetric intraocular pressure monitoring. Exp Eye Res. 2018;166:84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cetinel S, Montemagno C. Nanotechnology applications for glaucoma. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016;5(1):70–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jia Y, Wei E, Wang X, et al. Optical coherence tomography angiography of optic disc perfusion in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(7):1322–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Akil H, Huang AS, Francis BA, et al. Retinal vessel density from optical coherence tomography angiography to differentiate early glaucoma, pre-perimetric glaucoma and normal eyes. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rao HL, Sreenivasaiah S, Dixit S, Riyazuddin M, Dasari S, Venugopal JP, Pradhan ZS, Puttaiah NK, Devi S, Mansouri K, Webers CA, Weinreb RN. Choroidal microvascular dropout in primary open-angle glaucoma eyes with disc hemorrhage. J Glaucoma. 2019;28(3):181–7.  https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000001173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Russo A, Mapham W, Turano R, Costagliola C, Morescalchi F, Scaroni N, Semeraro F. Comparison of smartphone ophthalmoscopy with slit-lamp biomicroscopy for grading vertical cup-to-disc ratio. J Glaucoma. 2016;25(9):e777–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mamtora S, Sandinha MT, Ajith A, Song A, Steel DHW. Smart phone ophthalmoscopy: a potential replacement for the direct ophthalmoscope. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(11):1766–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bastawrous A, Giardini ME, Bolster NM, et al. Clinical validation of a smartphone-based adapter for optic disc imaging in Kenya. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(2):151–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shanmugam MP, Mishra DK, Madhukumar R, Ramanjulu R, Reddy SY, Rodrigues G. Fundus imaging with a mobile phone: a review of techniques. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62(9):960–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prea SM, Kong YXG, Mehta A, He M, Crowston JG, Gupta V, Martin KR, Vingrys AJ. Six-month longitudinal comparison of a portable tablet perimeter with the Humphrey field analyzer. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;190:9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nesaratnam N, Thomas PBM, Kirollos R, Vingrys AJ, Kong GYX, Martin KR. Tablets at the bedside – iPad-based visual field test used in the diagnosis of Intrasellar Haemangiopericytoma: a case report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1):53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kong YX, He M, Crowston JG, Vingrys AJ. A comparison of perimetric results from a tablet perimeter and Humphrey Field Analyzer in glaucoma patients. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2016;5(6):2. eCollection 2016 NovCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johnson CA, Thapa S, George Kong YX, Robin AL. Performance of an iPad application to detect moderate and advanced visual field loss in Nepal. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;182:147–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brown B. Smartphone app can screen for glaucoma. HealthTech Insider Web site. 2016. http://healthtechinsider.com/2016/09/16/smartphone-app-can-screen-glaucoma. Accessed 6 Dec 2018.
  21. 21.
    Dabasia PL, Fidalgo BR, Edgar DF, Garway-Heath DF, Lawrenson JG. Diagnostic accuracy of technologies for glaucoma case-finding in a community setting. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(12):2407–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ong EL, Zheng Y, Aung T, Tan L, Cheng CY, Wong TY, How A. Performance of the Moorfields motion displacement test for identifying eyes with glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(1):88–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gupta L, Cvintal V, Delvadia R, Sun Y, Erdem E, Zangalli C, et al. SPARCS and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity testing in normal controls and patients with cataract. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(5):753–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thakur S, Ichhpujani P, Kumar S, Kaur R, Sood S. Assessment of contrast sensitivity by Spaeth Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test and Pelli Robson Chart Test in patients with varying severity of glaucoma. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(8):1392–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Faria BM, Duman F, Zheng CX, Waisbourd M, Gupta L, Ali M, et al. Evaluating contrast sensitivity in age-related macular degeneration using a Novel Computer-Based Test, The Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity Test. Retina. 2015;35(7):1465–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nakanishi M, Wang YT, Jung TP, et al. Detecting glaucoma with a portable brain-computer interface for objective assessment of visual function loss. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:550–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    La Mancusa A, Horn FK, Kremers J, et al. Pattern electroretinograms during the cold pressor test in normals and glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(4):2173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zheng C, Johnson TV, Garg A, Boland MV. Artificial intelligence in glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2019;30(2):97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jones L, Bryan SR, Miranda MA, et al. Example of monitoring measurements in a virtual eye clinic using ‘big data’. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:911–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Von Thun Und Hohenstein-Blaul N, Kunst S, Pfeiffer N, Grus FH. Biomarkers for glaucoma: from the lab to the clinic. Eye (Lond). 2017;31(2):225–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ban N, Siegfried CJ, Lin JB, et al. GDF15 is elevated in mice following retinal ganglion cell death and in glaucoma patients. JCI Insight. 2017;2(9):e91455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Boehm N, Wolters D, Thiel U, et al. New insights into autoantibody profiles from immune privileged sites in the eye: a glaucoma study. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26(1):96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Benoist d’Azy C, Pereira B, Chiambaretta F, Dutheil F. Oxidative and anti-oxidative stress markers in chronic glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0166915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Khawaja AP, Cooke Bailey JN, Wareham NJ, Scott RA, Simcoe M, Igo RP Jr, Song YE, Wojciechowski R, Cheng CY, Khaw PT, Pasquale LR, Haines JL, Foster PJ, Wiggs JL, Hammond CJ, Hysi PG, UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium; NEIGHBORHOOD Consortium. Genome-wide analyses identify 68 new loci associated with intraocular pressure and improve risk prediction for primary open-angle glaucoma. Nat Genet. 2018;50(6):778–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Khawaja AP, Viswanathan AC. Are we ready for genetic testing for primary open-angle glaucoma? Eye. 2018;32(5):877–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Parul Ichhpujani
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyGovernment Medical College and HospitalChandigarhIndia

Personalised recommendations