Advertisement

Practicing Ethnography in a Social Enterprise: Developing an Internal Critique

  • Kishore BhirdikarEmail author
  • Samapti Guha
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)

Abstract

It is suggested that social entrepreneurship has the ability to combine social interests with the business practices to bring positive changes in the society. SRREOSHI, a women-led organisation was set up in the year 2005. In this paper, we engage with the idea of whether tools of ethnography can be used as tools to develop an internal critique where everydayness of freedom is recognised as a process of empowerment. The idea of value creation is central to a social enterprise. In SRREOSHI’s work, the focus of research is on generating knowledge aimed towards finding solutions to specific developmental problems. The idea of research is on identifying the problems, identifying the target population and comparing situations to assess the implementation. The research happens within the broader rubric of women’s empowerment. Ethnography as a research method which attempts to discover cultures and experiences of people involved in a programme can offer important tools of research that a social enterprise can use. However, we suggest that social value creation through a social enterprise involves attempts to collectivise and more attention needs to be paid in nurturing the collective. We feel that tools of ethnography can offer us important avenues of a stronger collective aimed at creating values for sustainable women’s empowerment.

Keywords

Social entrepreneurship Ethnography Social enterprise Internal critique 

References

  1. Appadurai, A. (2006). The right to research. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 4(2), 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  3. Baiocchi, G., & Connor, B. T. (2008). The ethnos in the polis: Political ethnography as a mode of inquiry. Sociology Compass, 2(1), 139–155, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Buttigieg, J. A. (2011). Antonio Gramsci: Prison notebooks (Vol. III) (J. A. Buttigieg, Ed., Trans.). Columbia University Press: New York.Google Scholar
  6. Chandra, Y. (2017). Social entrepreneurship as emancipatory work. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(6), 657–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherrier, H., Goswami, P., & Ray, S. (2018). Social entrepreneurship: Creating value in the context of institutional complexity. Journal of Business Research, 86, 245–258.Google Scholar
  8. Choi, N., & Majumdar, S. (2014). Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept: Opening a new avenue for systematic future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(2014), 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of “social entrepreneurship”. https://entrepreneurship.duke.edu/news-item/the-meaning-of-social-entrepreneurship/ Retrieved 2.12.2018 at 10am.
  10. Gille, Z., & Riain, S. Ó. (2002). Global ethnography. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 271–295.Google Scholar
  11. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3rd ed) London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Hoey, B. A. (2014). A simple introduction to the practice of ethnography and guide to ethnographic fieldnotes. Mimeograph, Marshall University. http://works.bepress.com/brian_hoey/12/. Retrieved 14.5.2018 at 2.20 pm.
  13. Jaaware, A. (2016). Academic freedom and the humanities. Seminar. Retrieved on 8 Aug 2017. http://www.india-seminar.com/2016/686/686_aniket_jaaware.htm.
  14. Pink, S., & Morgan, J. (2013). Short-term ethnography: Intense routes to knowing. Symbolic Interaction, 36(3), 351–361.Google Scholar
  15. Reis, T. (1999). Unleashing the new resources and entrepreneurship for the common good: A scan, synthesis and scenario for action. Battle Creek, MI: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2007). Profitable business models and market creation in the context of deep poverty: A strategic view. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(4), 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Singh, A. (2016). The process of social value creation: A multiple-case study on social entrepreneurship in India. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Tumilowicz, A., Neufeld, L. M., & Pelto, G. H. (2016). Using ethnography in implementation research to improve nutrition interventions in populations. Maternal and Child Nutrition, 11(Suppl. 3), 55–72.Google Scholar
  19. Vesa, M., & Vaara, E. (2014). Strategic ethnography 2.0: Four methods for advancing strategy process and practice research. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 288–298.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management and Labour StudiesTata Institute of Social SciencesMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.School of Management and Labour Studies, Centre for Social EntrepreneurshipTata Institute of Social SciencesDeonarIndia

Personalised recommendations