Advertisement

Comparative Study on Thermal Sensation and Skin Temperature Passing Different Transitional Spaces with or without Air-Conditioning in a Shopping Mall

  • Jie HanEmail author
  • Wenheng Zheng
  • Rong Hu
  • Zhihong Yang
  • Guoqiang Zhang
  • Per Heiselberg
  • David Hou Chi Chow
Conference paper
  • 243 Downloads
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

What is the difference between the thermal sensation and skin temperature in transitional spaces with or without air-conditioning? Is it necessary to have intensive air-conditioning in transitional spaces of southern China? In order to answer these questions, this paper presents a comparative study performed in a selected shopping mall with two transitional spaces–one with air-conditioning, the other without. The results show that the thermal sensation and skin temperature is different due to the presentation of air-conditioning. It also indicates that air- conditioning for the transitional spaces is needed in southern China. Meanwhile, the study involves continuous measurements of the skin temperature of twenty students while they simultaneously filled out a questionnaire. When subjects passing these two transitional spaces, different skin temperatures and its variation rates result in inconsistent thermal sensation. However, there was a linear relationship between the thermal sensation and the variation rate of mean skin temperature was obtained. These findings can provide valuable information for a good guide to air-conditioning design in transitional spaces.

Keywords

Transitional spaces Air-conditioning Thermal sensation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The project is supported by Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (No. 2018GXNSFAA281212) and Joint Cultivation Fund of Guangxi (No. 2018GXNSFAA138071), Demonstration and Research on Key Technologies of Low Carbon Green Intelligent Zone in Guilin City (No. 20180107-2). Thank Dr. Leixing Ouyang and Ms. Vivi to improve English writing of this paper.

References

  1. 1.
    Chun, C.Y., Kwok, A., Tamra, A.: Thermal comfort in transitional spaces-basic concepts: literature review and trial measurement. Build. Environ. 39, 1187–1192 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pitts, A., Saleh, J.B.: Potential for energy saving in building transition spaces. Energy Build. 39, 815–822 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Miura, S.: Study on thermal environment and energy consumption in underground shopping centers. J. Arch. Inst. Jpn. 430, 13–22 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chun, C.Y., Tamura, A.: Thermal comfort in urban transitional spaces. Build. Environ. 40, 633–639 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pitts, A., Saleh, J., Sharples, J.: Building transitional spaces, comfort and energy use. In: 25th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Dublin, Paper No: 591 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spagnolo, J., de Dear, R.: A field study of thermal comfort in outdoor and semi-outdoor environments in subtropical Sydney Australia. Build. Environ. 38, 721–738 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ASHRAE.: ASHRAE Standard 55: Thermal Environment Conditions for Human Occupancy. ASHRAE Engineers, Inc., Atlanta, GA (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ISO: ISO 7730: Moderate thermal environment-determination of the PMV and PPD indices and specification of the conditions for thermal comfort. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China: GB/T 50785: evaluation standard for indoor thermal environment in civil buildings. China Architecture and Building Press, Beijing (2012) (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, Z.J., Zhang, Y.F., Ding, E.: Acceptable temperature steps for transitional spaces in the hot-humid area of China. Build. Environ. 121, 190–199 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Taib, N., Abdullah, A., Ali, Z., Fadzil, S.F.S., Yeok, F.S.: Trends in the air temperature of transitional spaces of a high-rise office building: the effects of season and location. Indoor Built Environ. 23(8), 1117–1128 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen, C.P., Hwang, R.L., Chang, S.Y., Lu, Y.T.: Effects of temperature steps on human skin physiology and thermal sensation response. Build. Environ. 46, 2387–2397 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, Y.F., Zhang, J., Chen, H.M., Du, X.H., Meng, Q.L.: Effects of step changes of temperature and humidity on human responses of people in hot-humid area of China. Build. Environ. 80, 174–183 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dahlan, D.N., Gital, Y.Y.: Thermal sensations and comfort investigations in transient conditions in tropical office. Appl. Ergon. 54, 169–176 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yu, J., Yang, B., Zhu, N.: Effect of thermal transient on thermal comfort in temporarily occupied space in winter-A case study in Tianjin. Build. Environ. 93(2), 27–33 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vargas, G.A., Stevenson, F.: Thermal memory and transition in lobby spaces. Energy Proc. 62, 502–511 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wu, Y.C., Mahdavi, A.: Assessment of thermal comfort under transitional conditions. Build. Environ. 76, 30–36 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ghaddar, N., Ghali, K., Chehaitly, S.: Assessing thermal comfort of active people in transitional spaces in presence of air movement. Energy Build. 43(10), 2832–2842 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Choi, J.H., Loftness, V.: Investigation of human body skin temperatures as a bio-signal to indicate overall thermal sensations. Build. Environ. 58, 258–269 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Choi, J.H., Yeom, D.W.: Study of data-driven thermal sensation prediction model as a function of local body skin temperatures in a built environment. Build. Environ. 121, 130–147 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sim, S.Y., Koh, M.J., Joo, K.M., Noh, S.W., Park, S.Y., Kim, Y.H., Park, K.S.: Estimation of thermal sensation based on wrist skin temperature. Sensors 16, 420 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jie Han
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Wenheng Zheng
    • 1
  • Rong Hu
    • 1
  • Zhihong Yang
    • 2
  • Guoqiang Zhang
    • 2
  • Per Heiselberg
    • 3
  • David Hou Chi Chow
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Architecture and Transportation EngineeringGuilin University of Electronic TechnologyGuilinChina
  2. 2.College of Civil EngineeringHunan UniversityChangshaChina
  3. 3.Department of Civil EngineeringAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark
  4. 4.Sustainability, Complexity and Uncertainty in Building Assessment (SCUBA) Group, School of ArchitectureUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations