Application of Information Technology in Medical Ultrasound Engineering

  • Siping Chen
  • Xin Chen
  • Yuanyuan Shen
  • Yanrong Guo
  • Xiaonian He
  • Huiying Wen


Based on the engineering techniques such as electronic technology, computer technology and signal processing method, medical ultrasound engineering uses ultrasound as a carrier or source of energy for information detection. It utilizes acoustic characteristics and biological effects, which are induced by the interaction between ultrasound and human tissues, to diagnose or treat diseases. For example, the development of medical ultrasound imaging extends from the original one-dimensional A-mode information to the two-dimensional B-mode image, and then to the color Doppler imaging associated with blood flow. This development history consists of continuous discovery of the implicit information from the ultrasound echo. In recent years, researchers have used a variety of interdisciplinary and comprehensive information to promote the sustainable development of medical ultrasound engineering. On the one hand, more information is incorporated into transmitted ultrasound. Coded ultrasound imaging is a good example. On the other hand, ultrasound is combined with other physical technology to induce more information in ultrasound echo. Ultrasound elastography, magneto-acoustic tomography, photoacoustic imaging, and microbubble contrast imaging are such examples. These new technologies are promoting medical ultrasound engineering in the directions of functional diagnosis and precision medicine.


Medical ultrasound engineering Information technology Interdiscipline 


  1. 1.
    Siping Chen, 10000 Scientific Problems, Volume of Information Science, Science Press, 2011: 256–259.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garra BS, Cespedes EI, Ophir J, et al. Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. Radiology, 1997, 202(1): 79–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ophir J, Céspedes I, Ponnekanti H, et al. Elastography: A quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues. Ultrasonic Imaging, 1991, 13(2): 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shiina T, Nightingale KR, Palmeri ML, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 1: Basic principles and terminology. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2015, 41(5): 1126–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Piscaglia F, Marinelli S, Bota S, et al. The role of ultrasound elastographic techniques in chronic liver disease: current status and future perspectives. European Journal of Radiology, 2014, 83(3):450–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zheng Y, Yao A, Chen S, et al. Ultrasound vibrometry using orthogonal- frequency-based vibration pulses. IEEE transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 2013, 60(11): 2359–2370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen X, Shen Y, Zheng Y, et al. Quantification of liver viscoelasticity with acoustic radiation force: a study of hepatic fibrosis in a rat model. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2013, 39(11): 2091–2102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tingqing Yang, Theory and Application of Viscoelasticity, Science Press, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fung Y. Biomechanics: mechanical properties of living tissues. Springer, 1993.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Atay SM, Kroenke CD, Sabet A, et al. Measurement of the Dynamic Shear Modulus of Mouse Brain Tissue In Vivo By Magnetic Resonance Elastography. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2008, 130(2):021013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ocal S, Ozcan MU, Basdogan I, et al. Effect of preservation period on the viscoelastic material properties of soft tissues with implications for liver transplantation. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2010, 132(10):101007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Freed AD, Diethelm K. Fractional calculus in biomechanics: a 3D viscoelastic model using regularized fractional derivative kernels with application to the human calcaneal fat pad. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 2006, 5(4):203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joines WT, Zhang Y, Li C, et al. The measured electrical properties of normal and malignant human tissues from 50 to 900 MHz. Medical Physics, 1994, 21(4):547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Guoqiang Liu, Magneto-Acoustic Tomography Technology, Science Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li Y, Liu G, Xia H, et al. Numerical Simulations and Experimental Study of Magneto-Acousto-Electrical Tomography With Plane Transducer. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, PP(99):1–4.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Donnell M. Coded excitation system for improving the penetration of real-time phased-array imaging systems. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, 1992, 39(3):341–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Walker WF, Trahey GE. A fundamental limit on delay estimation using partially correlated speckle signals. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 2002, 42(2):301–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Song P, Urban MW, Manduca A, et al. Coded excitation plane wave imaging for shear wave motion detection. IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, 2015, 62(7):1356–1372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    He XN, Diao XF, Lin HM, et al. Improved shear wave motion detection using coded excitation for transient elastography. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7:44483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhigang Wang, Ultrasonic molecular imaging, Science Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beccaria K, Canney M, Goldwirt L, et al. Opening of the blood-brain barrier with an unfocused ultrasound device in rabbits. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2013, 119(4): 887–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Choi JJ, Pernot M, Small SA, et al. Noninvasive, transcranial and localized opening of the blood-brain barrier using focused ultrasound in mice. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2007, 33(1): 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hynynen K, Mcdannold N, Vykhodtseva N, et al. Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. Radiology. 2001, 220(3): 640–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aryal M, Arvanitis CD, Alexander PM, et al. Ultrasound-mediated blood-brain barrier disruption for targeted drug delivery in the central nervous system. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2014, 72: 94–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Treat LH, Mcdannold N, Zhang Y, et al. Improved Anti-Tumor Effect of Liposomal Doxorubicin after Targeted Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption by Mri-Guided Focused Ultrasound in Rat Glioma. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2012, 38(10): 1716–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yang FY, Wong TT, Teng MC, et al. Focused ultrasound and interleukin-4 receptor-targeted liposomal doxorubicin for enhanced targeted drug delivery and antitumor effect in glioblastoma multiforme. Journal of Controlled Release. 2012, 160(3): 652–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shen Y, Guo J, Chen G, et al. Delivery of Liposomes with Different Sizes to Mice Brain after Sonication by Focused Ultrasound in the Presence of Microbubbles. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 2016, 42(7):1499–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shen Y, Pi Z, Yan F, et al. Enhanced delivery of paclitaxel liposomes using focused ultrasound with microbubbles for treating nude mice bearing intracranial glioblastoma xenografts. International Journal of Nanomedicine, 2017, 12:5613–5629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Publishing House of Electronics Industry 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siping Chen
    • 1
  • Xin Chen
    • 1
  • Yuanyuan Shen
    • 1
  • Yanrong Guo
    • 1
  • Xiaonian He
    • 1
  • Huiying Wen
    • 1
  1. 1.National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, School of Biomedical EngineeringShenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations