Advertisement

Literacy and Reading in Childhood and Beyond

  • Priti Joshi
  • Subir Shukla
Chapter

Abstract

Reading, and more importantly taking pleasure in reading, clearly lays the foundation for different aspects of a child’s future development. Literacy is a multidimensional process, often involving ‘complex social practice’ in which the reader has to play an active role in connecting symbols with experience in order to create meaning. A mechanistic approach that underplays the meaning-making essence of reading can lead to children losing interest. The chapter describes the process by which children learn language and reading, especially in a multilingual context such as India. The elements of an ideal situation to foster love of reading include a print-rich environment, a family where everyone reads, and integrating reading in play and real-life routines, though these are hard to achieve. Exposure to books from an early age does help. In middle childhood and adolescence, it is important to ensure time for reading and also continue engaging with the child around reading. Growing up in a family with limited access to books does disadvantage a child when it comes to reading – however, families could be well supported to engage in alternative practices around narration. Interest-based (rather than need-based) engagement with reading can help children with disabilities too. While reading skills are seen as enabling success in content-based examinations, reading generates a host of abilities that support education during the school years and beyond. Choosing appropriate reading material for different ages require us to set aside adult notions and look at the qualities of books from the child’s perspective. Parents could also take a nuanced approach to their children’s use of digital devices for reading and learning – passive and excessive use of technology has adverse consequences. A vision for the future includes commitment to developing a culture of reading by enhancing access and creating opportunities for schools, families and communities.

References

  1. Agnihotri, R. K., Khanna, A. L., & Shukla, S. (1994). Eklavya’s innovative experiment in primary education. New Delhi, India: Ratna Sagar.Google Scholar
  2. ASER. (2016). Annual status of education report 2016. New Delhi, India: ASER Centre.Google Scholar
  3. Bettelheim, B., & Zelan, K. (1982). On learning to read: The child’s fascination with meaning. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  4. Browne, A. (2009). Developing language and literacy 3–8. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Cambourne, B. (1988). The whole story: Natural learning and the acquisition of literacy in the classroom. New York: Ashton Scholastic.Google Scholar
  6. CARE/USAID. (2016). Early language and literacy in India: A position paper. New Delhi: CARE.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, C. J. (2013). The effects of parental literacy involvement and child reading interest on the development of emergent literacy skills (Doctoral dissertation). University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA. Retrieved from https://dc.uwm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1235&context=etd
  8. Carter, D. R., Chard, D. J., & Pool, J. L. (2009). A family strengths approach to early language and literacy development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 519–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, C., & Rumbold, K. (2006). Reading for pleasure: A research overview. National Literacy Trust. Retrieved from https://literacytrust.org.uk/research-services/research-reports/reading-pleasure-research-overview/
  12. Clay, M. (1975). What did I write? Auckland, New Zealand: Heinemann Educational Books.Google Scholar
  13. Cremin, T. (2007). Revisiting reading for pleasure: Diversity, delight and desire. In K. Goouch & A. Lambirth (Eds.), Understanding phonics and the teaching of reading (pp. 166–185). Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DiPietro, J. A. (2000). Baby and the brain: Advances in child development. Annual Review of Public Health, 21, 455–471.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dudley-Marling, C. (1986). Assessing the reading and development of learning disabled students: An holistic perspective. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 2(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
  17. Early Head Start. (2006, April). Supporting language and cognitive development in early Head Start: Research to practice brief. Washington, DC: Office of Planning Research and Evaluation. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/lang_literacy.pdf
  18. Eklavya. (1988–2008). Khushi-Khushi Class I -V (Eklavya textbooks). Bhopal: Eklavya. Retrieved from https://www.eklavya.in/past-work-top/programmes-past-top/prashika-activities/173-khushi-khushi
  19. Fields, M., Groth, L., & Spangler, K. (2004). Let’s begin reading right. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Franklin, B. M. (1980). From backwardness to L.D.: Behaviorism, systems theory, and the learning disabilities field historically reconsidered. The Journal of Education, 162(4), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garton, A. F. (1992). Social interaction and the development of language and cognition. Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Giroux, H. A. (1988). Teachers as intellectuals: Toward a critical pedagogy of learning. New York: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  24. Goodman, K. S. (1996). On reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  25. Government of India. (2016, December). Year end review 2016. Press Information Bureau, Ministry of Human Resource Development. Retrieved from http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=155999
  26. Government of India. (2018). Samagra Shiksha- Integrated Scheme for School Education . Ministry of Human Resource Development. Retrieved from http://samagra.mhrd.gov.in/
  27. Greenall, D., & Swan, M. (1986). Effective reading skills for advanced students. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hall, N., & Robinson, A. (1995). Exploring writing and play in the early years. London: David Fulton Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  29. Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Edward Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Horowitz, R., & Samuels, S. J. (2017). The achievement gap in reading: Complex causes, persistent issues, possible solutions. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ivanov, R. D. (2008). Reading in America: Issues and solutions. In P. R. Weingart (Ed.), Teaching and education: 21st century issues and challenges (pp. 13–72). New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Joshi, P. (2001). The meaning of disability: Experiences and expressions from children’s lives (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Delhi, India: University of Delhi.Google Scholar
  33. Joshi, P. (2017). Collaboration to improve literacy: Making learning sustainable in schools, 42nd ATEE annual conference proceedings. Retrieved from https://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/947730.Conference_proceedings_ATEE_2017_Annual_Conference.pdf
  34. Keen, E., & Zimmerman, S. (1997). Mosaic of thought. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  35. Klauda, S. L. (2009). The role of parents in adolescents’ reading motivation and activity. Educational Psychological Review, 21(4), 325–363.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9112-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klinenberg, E. (2018). Palaces for the people: How social infrastructure can help fight inequality, polarization, and the decline of civic life. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
  37. LaCroix, A. (2014). Reading motivation, parent engagement, and student engagement as it relates to reading achievement of urban adolescents (Doctoral dissertation). St. John Fisher College, Rochester, NY, USA. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/48617419.pdf
  38. Lawhon, T., & Cobb, J. (2002). Routines that build emergent literacy in infants, toddlers, and pre-schoolers. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30, 115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lea, M., & Street, B. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lenhart, A. (2015, April). Teen, social media and technology overview 2015. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2015/04/PI_TeensandTech_Update2015_0409151.pdf
  41. Lockwood, M. (2008). Promoting reading for pleasure in the primary school. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  42. Mehta, A. (2016). Elementary education in India, 2015–2016. Retrieved from http://dise.in/Downloads/Publications/Documents/Analytical_Table_2015-16.pdf
  43. Menon, S., Krishnamurthy, R., Sajitha, S., Apte, N., Basargekar, A., Subramaniam, S., et al. (2017). Literacy research in Indian languages (LiRiL): Report of a three-year longitudinal study on early reading and writing in Marathi and Kannada. Bangalore, India/New Delhi, India: Azim Premji University/Tata Trusts.Google Scholar
  44. Miller, W. (2000). Strategies for developing emergent literacy. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Moore, D. W., Bean, T. W., Birdyshaw, D., & Rycik, J. (1999). Adolescent literacy: A position statement. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(1), 97–112.Google Scholar
  46. National Centre for Children’s Literature [NCCL]. (2012). Guide to good books: Criteria for selecting quality children’s books. New Delhi, India: National Book Trust.Google Scholar
  47. National Council for Educational Research and Training [NCERT]. (2014). National achievement survey. New Delhi, India: National Council for Educational Research and Training.Google Scholar
  48. Nussbaum, M. C. (2012). Not for profit: Why democracy needs the humanities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Perry, K. (2012). What is literacy? A critical overview of sociocultural perspectives. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 8(1), 50–71. Retrieved from http://jolle.coe.uga.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/What-is-Literacy_KPerry.pdf
  50. Pratham Books. (2015). Annual Report, 2014–15. Retrieved from https://prathambooks.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/PB-Annual-Report-2014-15.pdf
  51. Reynolds, M. (2004). I won’t read and you can’t make me: Reaching reluctant teen readers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  52. Ruddell, R. B. (2002). Teaching children to read and write: Becoming an effective literacy teacher. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  53. Saraswathi, T. S., & Oke, M. (2013). Ecology of adolescence in India: Implications for policy and practice. Psychological Studies, 58(4), 353–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schwarz, D. R. (2008). In defense of reading: Teaching literature in the twenty-first century. Malden, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Senechal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sheldrick-Ross, C., McCechnie, L., & Rothbauer, P. M. (2005). Reading matters: What the research reveals about reading, libraries and community. Oxford, UK: Libraries Unlimited.Google Scholar
  57. Sparks, S. D. (2015, April 21). Key to vocabulary gap is quality of conversation, not dearth of words [Blogpost]. Education Week. Retrieved from https://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2015/04/22/key-to-vocabulary-gap-is-quality-of.html
  58. Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent-adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 11(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sumara, D. (2002). Why reading literature in school still matters. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. UNESCO. (2017). Reading the past, writing the future: Fifty years of promoting literacy. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247563
  61. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. [Original manuscripts (1930–1934)].Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Priti Joshi
    • 1
  • Subir Shukla
    • 2
  1. 1.Lady Irwin CollegeUniversity of DelhiNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.Group IgnusNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations