Advertisement

Author Impression on Dependent Authors Using Wordtovector Method

  • Maheshkumar B. LandgeEmail author
  • Ramesh R. NaikEmail author
  • C. Namrata MahenderEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1037)

Abstract

This paper provides an introduction to types of authorship analysis which is important in many applications of NLU, QA, Plagiarism detection etc. Author profiling helps to identify the traits of an author in the given text/texts, which finally leads to predict whether those traits are present in other text that reflects the important characteristics of the original author. The original author normally observed to have some sort of his impact or impression on dependent writers or authors The main focus of this paper is identifying the weight of impact of original author on dependent author. Word to vector technique is been used in this work to identify impact of original author on dependent authors.

Keywords

Author impression Authorship analysis Wordtovector 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to acknowledge and thanks to CSRI DST Major Project sanctioned No. SR/CSRI/71/2015(G), Computational and Psycholinguistic Research Lab Facility supporting to this work and Department of Computer Science and Information Technology, Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India.

References

  1. 1.
    What is plagiarism? (2018). http://www.plagiarism.org/ (plagiarism definition). Accessed 8 Aug 2018
  2. 2.
    Zheng, R., et al.: A framework for authorship identification of online messages: writing-style features and classification techniques. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 57(3), 378–393 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brennan, M., et al.: Adversarial stylometry. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur. 15(3), 12:1–12:22 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krause, M., et al.: A behavioral biometrics based authentication method for MOOC’s that is robust against imitation attempts. In: L@S 2014 Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale Conference (Work in Progress), Atlanta, GA, USA, pp. 201–202. ACM Press (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    SantBahinabaicheabhang (2018). http://www.transliteral.org/pages/z70612224312/view. Accessed 01 Aug 2018
  6. 6.
    Mikolovet, T., et al.: Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. CoRR, vol. abs/1301.3781 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rehurek, R., et al.: Software framework for topic modeling with large corpora. In: Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, Valletta, Malta, pp. 45–50 (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levy, O., et al.: Dependency-based word embeddings. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), Baltimore, Maryland, pp. 302–308 (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Clough, P.: Plagiarism in natural and programming languages: an overview of current tools and technologies. Technical report, University of Sheffeld, Sheffeld, UK, June 2000Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mikolov, T., et al.: Discovering word senses from text using random indexing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1301.3781 (2013)
  11. 11.
    Rong, X.: word2vec parameter learning explained. arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.2738 (2014)

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CS and ITDr. B.A.M. UniversityAurangabad (MS)India

Personalised recommendations