Nonlinear Neural Dynamics
Brain activities measured by EEG exhibit complex behavior with nonlinear dynamic properties. Therefore, methods derived from nonlinear theory could contribute to the understanding of the EEG dynamics and the underlying brain processes. Until now, a number of nonlinear dynamic methods have been proposed. These methods reveal various nonlinear properties of the EEG signals. Among them, “complexity” and “entropy” are the widely used concept in the EEG analysis. Moreover, entropy-based measures have been applied into clinical practice of monitoring depth of anesthesia. This study selects three classical types of nonlinear dynamic measures (total 12), introducing their basic theory and giving examples of applying them in real EEG analysis. All the MATLAB codes can be downloaded from https://pan.baidu.com/s/1ro2VEJWdsb5X6dCtueGUOA with password: hf4x. Although previous studies compared the performance of various nonlinear dynamic measures at different situations, it is still improper to determine which measure is the best one. The measure selection in your study should take a number of factors into account, such as the parameter selection, robust to artifacts, compute consumption, the correlation of the nonlinear characteristics with the underlying neural process, and so on.
KeywordsEEG Complexity Entropy Nonlinear dynamics
- Anier A, Lipping T, Jantti V, Puumala P, Huotari A Entropy of the EEG in transition to burst suppression in deep anesthesia: surrogate analysis. In: Engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC), 2010 annual international conference of the IEEE, 2010. IEEE, pp. 2790–3.Google Scholar
- Chen CC, Hsu YT, Chan HL, Chiou SM, Tu PH, Lee ST, Tsai CH, Lu CS, Brown P. Complexity of subthalamic 13-35 Hz oscillatory activity directly correlates with clinical impairment in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2010;224(1):234–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2010.03.015.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klockars JG, Hiller A, Munte S, van Gils MJ, Taivainen T. Spectral entropy as a measure of hypnosis and hypnotic drug effect of total intravenous anesthesia in children during slow induction and maintenance. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2):340–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182410b5e.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marwan N. Encounters with neighbours: current developments of concepts based on recurrence plots and their applications. Norbert Marwan; 2003.Google Scholar
- Matic V, Cherian PJ, Koolen N, Ansari AH, Naulaers G, Govaert P, Huffel SV, Vos MD, Vanhatalo S (2015) Objective differentiation of neonatal EEG background grades using detrended fluctuation analysis. Front Hum Neurosci 9:189.Google Scholar
- Richman JS, Moorman JR. Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am J Phys Heart Circ Phys. 2000;278(6):H2039–49.Google Scholar
- Rilling G, Flandrin P, Gonçalvés P. On empirical mode decomposition and its algorithms. In: IEEE-EURASIP workshop on nonlinear signal and image processing, NSIP-03, Grado (I), 2003.Google Scholar
- Schultz A, Siedenberg M, Grouven U, Kneif T, Schultz B. Comparison of Narcotrend index, Bispectral index, spectral and entropy parameters during induction of propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. J Clin Monit Comput. 2008;22(2):103–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-008-9111-6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication, Bell System. New York: American Telephone and Telegraph Co.; 1922.Google Scholar
- Shannon CE, Weaver W. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1949.Google Scholar
- Sleigh JW, Olofsen E, Dahan A, De Goede J, Steyn-Ross DA (2001) Entropies of the EEG: the effects of general anaesthesia.Google Scholar
- Zhou S, Zhang Z, Gu J Interpretation of coarse-graining of Lempel-Ziv complexity measure in ECG signal analysis. Conference proceedings: annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society conference 2011: pp. 2716–2719; 2011. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090745.