Advertisement

Determination of Fighter Cockpit DEP Based on WEPs of Pilots in Simulated Flight

  • Xiaochao GuoEmail author
  • Yanyan Wang
  • Yu Bai
  • Duanqin Xiong
  • Jian Du
  • Qingfeng LiuEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 576)

Abstract

The working eye position (WEP) of 256 Chinese male pilots were tested in simulated flight to determine the design eye position (DEP) of advanced fighter cockpit. Four WEPs were defined in that (1) WEP-C, i.e. the WEP with seated posture of cruise, (2) WEP-L, i.e. the WEP with oblique posture of left sway, (3) WEP-R, i.e. the WEP with oblique posture of right sway, and (4) WEP-G, i.e. the WEP with bowed posture of anti-G load in a simulated recurrences of their mission flight for level linear cruise or rapid maneuvers. The results were found that the WEP-L showed significantly about 30 mm left-shifting with 3 mm downward-shifting marginally, the WEP-R showed significantly about 40 mm right and 18 mm backward shifting with 3 mm downward-shifting, and the WEP-G showed significantly about 10 mm downward-shifting in contrast with the WEP-C. The DEP should be pointed at (0,125,755) in (x, y, z) above neutral seat reference point (NSRP) based on WEPs of pilots rather than point (0,155,795) in GJB35B, and the HUD design eye box (DEB) may be in size of 340 mm wide, 195 mm high, and 470 mm deep better than 340, 185, and 415 mm without the WEP-G.

Keywords

Design eye position (DEP) Working eye position (WEP) Design eye box (DEB) Aircraft cockpit Head up display (HUD) Neutral seat reference point (NSRP) Anthropology Pilots Ergonomics Human factors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Mr Mingzhao Sun for his contribution to 3-D measurements of the WEPs of pilots in simulated flight.

Compliance with Ethical Standards The study was approved by the Academic Ethics Committee of Air Force Medical Center of FMMU. All subjects were provided with and signed an informed consent form. All relevant ethical safeguards have been met with regard to subject protection.

References

  1. 1.
    FAA (2014) AC 25-11B Electronic flight displaysGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    GJB 35B-2008 Aircrew station geometry for fighter and attacker. Military Standard Publishing House of the General Armament Department, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    GJB 4856-2003 Human dimensions of Chinese male pilot population. Military Standard Publishing House of the General Armament Department, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sun M, Liu Q, Guo X et al (2011) 3-D Measurement of working eye position of pilots in simulated aircraft cockpit. In: Long S and Dhillon BS (ed) Man-machine-environment system engineering: proceedings of the 11th conference on man-machine-environment system engineering. Scientific Research Publishing, USAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guo X, Wang Y, Liu Q et al (2016) Q-Q test for pilot evaluation of ergonomics in aircraft cockpit. In: Long S and Dhillon BS (ed) Man-machine-environment system engineering, lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 406. Springer, pp 13–19Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guo X, Liu Q, Xiong D et al (2019) Two-step subjective rating technique of pilot evaluation in Q-Q test for aircraft cockpit. In: Long S, Dhillon BS (ed) Man-machine-environment system engineering, lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 527. Springer, pp 87–96Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang Y, Guo X, Liu Q et al (2018) Three-dimensional measurement applied in design eye point of aircraft cockpits. Aerospace Med Hum Perform 89(4):371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    MIL-STD-1472G (2012) Human engineering. Department of Defense, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Air Force Medical Center of FMMUBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations