Advertisement

Ergonomics Analysis of Hand-Held Grinding Operation Working Posture Based on Jack

  • Yanqiu SunEmail author
  • Jianwu Chen
  • Zhenlong Lu
  • Bin Yang
  • Weijiang Liu
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 576)

Abstract

In this paper, it used Jack software to create static simulation environment for hand-held grinding operation workers, who work in different working posture and with different hand loads, workers can work in stand working or squat posture, and hand load is 1.5, 2.0 or 2.3 kg, which is the weight of angle grinder. We analysed hand-held grinding operation by using the lower back analysis tool, static strength prediction tool, fatigue recovery tool and ovako working posture analysis tool in Jack, compared the results of low back compression force, percent capable, recovery time needed and working posture evaluation and so on. The results show that stand working posture should use to the hand-held grinding operation worker, and the weight of angle grinder is smaller, the result is better.

Keywords

Hand-held grinding operation Working posture Hand load Angle grinder Static simulation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0801700), the basic research funding of China Academy of Safety Science and Technology (2019JBKY04, 2019JBKY11).

References

  1. 1.
    Chen J et al (2019) The application of Jack software in the size study of the exhaust hood on a welding torch. In: Long S, Dhillon B (eds) Man-machine-environment system engineering. MMESE 2018. Lecture notes in electrical engineering, vol 527. Springer, Singapore.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2481-9_25Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jack user manual version 8.5 [S]. Siemens Company (2014)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    GB/T 12985-91. General rules of using percentiles of the body dimensions for products designGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang J (2010) Man-machine engineering of product design. Chemical Industry Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Raschke U, Martin BJ, Chaffin DB (1996) Distributed moment histogram: a neurophysiology based method of agonist and antagonist trunk muscle activity prediction. J. Biomech 29(12):1587–1596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Dieen JH, Oude Vrielink HHE (1994) The use of the relation between relative force and endurance time. Ergonomics 37(2):231–243.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139408963641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen J et al (2011) Comparative research on measurement methods of work fatigue. J Safety Sci Technol 7(5):63–66Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Louhevaara V, Suurnäkki T, Hinkkanen S et al (1992) OWAS: a method for the evaluation of postural load during work. Institute of Occupational Health, Centre for Occupational SafetyGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Karhu O, Kansi P, Kuorina I (1977) Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. Appl Ergonom 8:199–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(77)90164-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanqiu Sun
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jianwu Chen
    • 1
  • Zhenlong Lu
    • 2
  • Bin Yang
    • 1
  • Weijiang Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.China Academy of Safety Science and TechnologyBeijingChina
  2. 2.Tiandi Science &Technology Co., Ltd.BeijingChina

Personalised recommendations