Advertisement

Development and Application of Test Software of Fine Operation Ability of Directional Motion

  • Weicai Tang
  • Yi XiaoEmail author
  • Fenggang Xu
  • Chunhui Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 576)

Abstract

The test software of fine operation ability of directional motion, which is used for handle control, is independently developed on the basis of the C++ program development platform for the discrete-type operation missions such as the spatial manipulator teleoperation, crane, excavator, etc. It aims to test the fine operation ability of directional motion of the operators, including the astronaut. The reliability and validity test results of the software indicate the software has good internal consistency reliability and retest reliability and can well differentiate the operators who have the training experience of manipulator teleoperation and the operators who are not trained. In addition, there is a significant correlation between the test and the operator’s age. The fine operation ability increases progressively with the increase of the age.

Keywords

Fine operation ability Directional motion Test software Reliability Validity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Equipment Advance Foundation of National Key Laboratory, No. 614222201060317.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study was approved by the Logistics Department for Civilian Ethics Committee of China Astronaut Research and Training Center.

All subjects who participated in the experiment were provided with and signed an informed consent form.

All relevant ethical safeguards have been met with regard to subject protection.

References

  1. 1.
    Zhao WF (2012) Advancement in the fine motor control ability of the elder. Chin J Gerontol 32(15):3348–3349Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li BL, Lin L, Dong Q et al (2002) The development of fine motors and their relations to children’s academic achievement. Acta Psychologica Sinica 34(5):52–57Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu PP, Wang JL (2013) The meaning and measurement of the fine motion of hand. Med J Chin People’s Armed Police Forces 24(7):639–640Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang GJ, Zhou JY, Zhang B et al (2011) A survey of teleoperator rendezvous and docking technology. Manned Spaceflight 17(2):38–44Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shayler D (2000) Disasters and accidents in manned spaceflight. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Manzey D, Lorenz B, Schiewe A et al (1995) Dual-mission performance in space: results from a single-case study during a short-term space mission. Human Factors: J Human Factors Ergon Soc 37(4):667–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Manzey D, Lorenz B, Poljakov V (1998) Mental performance in extreme environments: results from a performance monitoring study during a 438-day spaceflight. Ergonomics 41(4):537–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fowler B, Bock O, Comfort D (2000) Is dual-mission performance necessarily impaired in space? Human Factors: J Human Factors Ergon Soc 42(2):318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seidler RD, Reuter-Lorenz PA, Mulavara AP et al (2014) Spaceflight effects on neurocognitive performance: extent, longevity, and neural bases (NeuroMapping)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Forman RE (2011) Objective performance metrics for improved space teleroboticstraining. Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Henderson SE (1992) Motion assessment battery for children[M]. Psychological Corporation, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fowler B, Meehan S, Singhal A (2008) Perceptual-motor performance and associated kinematics in space. Hum Factors 50(6):879–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Summerlin LB (1977) Skylab, classroom in spaceGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang RZ (2009) The review of the effectiveness of various psychological tests in European and American pilot selection. J Civil Aviat Flight Univ China 20(3):17–21Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wu GC (1995) Assessment of flight ability from cognitive psychological point of view. Chin J Aviat Med 6(2):120–124Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    WEI HC (2013) The application research of psychomotor ability in civilaviation pilots selection. The Fourth Military Medical UniversityGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hui DD, Li XJ, Wen ZH et al (2014) Development and application of psychomotor ability test system. Comput Technol Dev 24(12):180–182Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Weicai Tang
    • 1
  • Yi Xiao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fenggang Xu
    • 1
  • Chunhui Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Human Factors EngineeringChina Astronaut Research and Training CenterBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations