Advertisement

Physiological Measures of Mental Workload: Evidence from Empirical Studies

  • Da Tao
  • Xu Zhang
  • Jian Cai
  • Haibo Tan
  • Xiaoyan Zhang
  • Tingru ZhangEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 576)

Abstract

Mental workload (MWL) is widely used in the design and evaluation of complex human–machine systems and can be measured by a number of physiological measures. However, the effectiveness of these measures seems unknown. This study was conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the effectiveness of physiological measures of MWL. Four electronic databases were systematically searched for empirical studies measuring MWL with physiological measures. Ninety-four studies were included for analysis. We identified 36 physiological measures and grouped them into electrocardiogram, eye movement, electroencephalogram, respiration, electromyogram, and skin measures. Thirty-three measures were reported to have significant associations with MWL, but their effectiveness varied. We also identified 11 physiological measures that were widely used and demonstrated high effectiveness in assessing MWL. However, their effectiveness did not remain consistent across different application domains. Our study offers insights into the understanding and selection of appropriate physiological measures to evaluate MWL in varied human–machine systems.

Keywords

Physiological measure Mental workload Human–machine system 

References

  1. 1.
    Young MS, Brookhuis KA, Wickens CD, Hancock PA (2015) State of science: mental workload in ergonomics. Ergonomics 58(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Galy E (2018) Consideration of several mental workload categories: perspectives for elaboration of new ergonomic recommendations concerning shiftwork AU—Galy, Edith. Theor Issues Ergonomics Sci 19(4):483–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marquart G, Cabrall C, Winter JD (2015) Review of eye-related measures of drivers’ mental workload. Procedia Manuf 3:2854–2861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Qin G, Yang W, Fei S, Zhizhong L, Xiaolu D (2013) Mental workload measurement for emergency operating procedures in digital nuclear power plants. Ergonomics 56(7):1070–1085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lean Y, Shan F (2012) Brief review on physiological and biochemical evaluations of human mental workload. Hum Factors Ergonomics Manuf Serv Ind 22(3):177–187MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Young MS, Stanton NA (2005) Mental workload. In: Stanton NA, Hedge A, Brookhuis K, Salas E, Hendrick HW (eds) Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods. Taylor & Francis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charles RL, Nixon J (2019) Measuring mental workload using physiological measures: a systematic review. Appl Ergonomics 74:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nixon J, Charles R (2017) Understanding the human performance envelope using electrophysiological measures from wearable technology. Cognit Technol Work 19(4):655–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jorna PGAM (1992) Spectral analysis of heart rate and psychological state: a review of its validity as a workload index. Biol Psychol 34(2):237–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Rivecourt M, Kuperus MN, Post WJ, Mulder LJM (2008) Cardiovascular and eye activity measures as indices for momentary changes in mental effort during simulated flight. Ergonomics 51(9):1295–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fairclough SH, Venables L, Tattersall A (2005) The influence of task demand and learning on the psychophysiological response. Int J Psychophysiol 56(2):171–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mehler B, Reimer B, Coughlin JF, Dusek JA (2009) Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transp Res Record 2138(1):6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fournier LR, Wilson GF, Swain CR (1999) Electrophysiological, behavioral, and subjective indexes of workload when performing multiple tasks: manipulations of task difficulty and training. Int J Psychophysiol 31(2):129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Da Tao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Xu Zhang
    • 2
  • Jian Cai
    • 2
  • Haibo Tan
    • 1
  • Xiaoyan Zhang
    • 2
  • Tingru Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Nuclear Power Safety Monitoring Technology and EquipmentShenzhenChina
  2. 2.Institute of Human Factors and Ergonomics, Shenzhen UniversityShenzhenChina

Personalised recommendations