Advertisement

Unpacking Teacher Quality: Key Issues for Early Career Teachers

  • Maria Assunção FloresEmail author
Chapter
  • 101 Downloads
Part of the Professional Learning and Development in Schools and Higher Education book series (PROD, volume 16)

Abstract

Teacher quality is seen as a key factor influencing the quality of education. However, while there is consensus on the importance of quality teachers for improving teaching and learning in schools, there is less agreement on how to define and assess quality. The aim of the chapter is twofold: (i) to identify and contrast the ways in which teacher quality has been defined internationally and (ii) to analyse (and deconstruct) the term “quality”, drawing upon empirical evidence from diverse stakeholders. Teacher quality has often been defined narrowly and related to standards, performativity and managerialism. However, it is also possible to identify more comprehensive understandings of teacher quality which take into account contextual, professional, political and personal dimensions. Contradictory trends may be identified in the ways in which teacher professionalism has been defined as well as in real conditions of teachers’ work in schools and classrooms. The chapter discusses the view of teachers as leaders of learning and its core dimensions, namely, motivation, resilience, innovation of practice and committed professionalism, and it concludes with key issues for early career teachers.

References

  1. Alcorn, N. (2014). Teacher education in New Zealand 1974–2014. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 447–460.Google Scholar
  2. Amaral, A. (2005). Bolonha, ensino superior e a competitividade económica. In J. P. Serralheiro (Ed.), O Processo de Bolonha e a formação dos educadores e professores portugueses (pp. 35–45). Porto: Prof. Edições.Google Scholar
  3. Bahia, S., Freire, I., Amaral, A., & Estrela, M. T. (2013). The emotional dimension of teaching in a group of Portuguese teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 19(3), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bakx, A., Koopman, M., de Kruijf, J., & den Brok, P. (2015). Primary school pupils’ views of characteristics of good primary school teachers: An exploratory, open approach for investigating pupils’ perceptions. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(5), 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing schools come out on top. London: McKinsey. http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/socialsector/resources/pdf/Worlds_School_systems_final.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2009.Google Scholar
  6. Beishuizen, J. J., Hof, E., van Putten, C. M., Bouwmeester, S., & Asscher, J. J. (2001). Students’ and teachers’ cognitions about good teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Peretz, M., & Flores, M. A. (2018). Tensions and paradoxes in teaching: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 202.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2018.1431216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conway, P., Murphy, R., Rath, A., & Hall, K. (2009). Learning to teach and its implications for the continuum of teacher education: A nine-country cross-national study. Cork: Teaching Council, University College.Google Scholar
  9. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Reconhecer e potenciar a eficácia docente: Guia para decisores politicos. In M. A. Flores (Ed.), A Avaliação de professores numa perspetiva internacional: Sentidos e implicações (pp. 197–235). Porto: Areal Editores.Google Scholar
  11. Darling-Hammond, L. (2013). Building a profession of teaching. In M. A. Flores et al. (Eds.), Back to the future: Legacies, continuities and changes in educational policy, practice and research (pp. 3–27). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Darling-Hammond, L., & Lieberman, A. (2012). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? In L. Darling-Hammond & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices (pp. 151–169). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzmann, J. D., Gatlin, S., & Heiling, V. J. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 1–51.Google Scholar
  15. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2014). Resilient teachers, resilient schools. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Direção-Geral de Estatísticas da Educação e Ciência. (2016). Perfil do docente 2014/2015. http://www.dgeec.mec.pt.
  17. European Commission. (2007). Improving the quality of teacher education (COM 392 Final). Brussels: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/education/com392_en.pdf. Accessed 10 July 2011.Google Scholar
  18. European Commission. (2013). Supporting teacher competence development for better learning outcomes. Brussels: European Commission Education and Training UE.Google Scholar
  19. European Union. (2009). Council conclusions of 26 November 2009 on the professional development of teachers and school leaders (Official Journal 2009/C 302/04, 12 December 2009).Google Scholar
  20. European Union. (2014). Council conclusions of 20 May 2014 on effective teacher education (Official Journal 2014/C 183/05, 14 June 2014).Google Scholar
  21. Flores, M. A. (2012a). The implementation of a new policy on teacher appraisal in Portugal: How do teachers experience it at school? Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 24(4), 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Flores, M. A. (2012b). Teachers’ work and lives: A European perspective. In C. Day (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of teacher and school development (pp. 94–107). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Flores, M. A. (2016a). O futuro da profissão de professor (The future of the teaching profession). In M. L. Spazziani (Ed.), Profissão Professor: cenários, tensões e perspectivas (pp. 332–355). São Paulo: Editora Unesp.Google Scholar
  24. Flores, M. A. (2016b). Teacher education curriculum. In J. Loughran & M. L. Hamilton (Eds.), International handbook of teacher education (pp. 187–230). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flores, M. A., & Derrington, M. L. (2017). School principals’ views of teacher evaluation policy: Lessons learned from two empirical studies. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(4), 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Flores, M. A., & Ferreira, F. I. (2016). Education and child poverty in times of austerity in Portugal: Implications for teachers and teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(4), 404–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frost, D. (2012). From professional development to system change: Teacher leadership and innovation. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2007). Teachers’ resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 1302–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Paper presented at Australian Council for Educational Research Conference, Melbourne, October. http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003/4. Accessed 13 Mar 2018.
  30. Hilton, G., Flores, M. A., & Niklasson, L. (2013). Teacher quality, professionalism and professional development: Findings from a European project. Teacher Development, 17(4), 431–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Imig, D., Wiseman, D., & Neel, M. (2014). A formação de professores nos EUA: Mudanças dinâmicas, resultados incertos. In M. A. Flores (Ed.), Formação e desenvolvimento profissional de professores: Contributos internacionais (pp. 61–80). Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
  32. Kutnick, P., & Jules, V. (1993). Pupils’ perceptions of a good teacher: A developmental perspective from Trinidad and Tobago. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(3), 400–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laurie, R., Nonoyama-Tarumi, Y., McKeown, R., & Hopkins, C. (2016). Contributions of Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) to quality education: A synthesis of research. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 226–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Maguire, M. (2014). Reforming teacher education in England: ‘An economy of discourses of truth’. Journal of Education Policy, 29(6), 774–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayer, D. (2014). Forty years of teacher education in Australia: 1974–2014. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(5), 461–473.Google Scholar
  36. Menter, I., & Hulme, M. (2011). Teacher education reform in Scotland: National and global influences. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(4), 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Ng, P. T. (2015). What is quality education? How can it be achieved? The perspectives of school middle leaders in Singapore. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27(4), 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nikel, J., & Lowe, J. (2010). Talking of fabric: A multi-dimensional model of quality in education. Compare, 40(5), 589–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers – final report. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., Hadar, L. L., Smith, K., & Helleve, I. (2017). Teachers’ perceived professional space and their agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 62, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poekert, P. E. (2012). Teacher leadership and professional development: Examining links between two concepts central to school improvement. Professional Development in Education, 38(2), 169–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Santelices, M. V., Valencia, E., Gonzalez, G., & Taut, S. (2017). Two teacher quality measures and the role of context: Evidence from Chile. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29, 111–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snoek, M., Clouder, C., De Ganck, J., Klonari, K., Lorist, P., Lukasova, H., Nilsen, E., Peklaj, C., Pfeifer, B., Putkiewitz, E., Rehn, J., & Spilkova, V. (2009). Teacher quality in Europe: Comparing formal descriptions. Paper presented at the Association for Teacher Education in Europe (ATEE) Conference, Majorca, Spain, 29 August–2 September.Google Scholar
  45. Tikly, L., & Barrett, A. M. (2011). Social justice, capabilities and the quality of education in low-income countries. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Townsend, T. (2011). Searching high and searching low, searching east and searching west: Looking for trust in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(4), 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2004). Education for all: The quality imperative: Education for all global monitoring report 2005. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  48. Vekeman, E., Devos, G., & Tuytens, M. (2015). The influence of teachers’ expectations on principals’ implementation of a new teacher evaluation policy in Flemish secondary education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 27(2), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Willis, J. S., & Haymore Sandholtz, J. (2009). Constrained professionalism: Dilemmas of teaching in the face of test-based accountability. Teachers College Record, 111(4), 1065–1114.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MinhoBragaPortugal

Personalised recommendations