Advertisement

Contribution of Learner Characteristics in the Development of Adaptive Learner Model

  • Amit KumarEmail author
  • Vishal Bharti
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 989)

Abstract

Learner models are built to enable adaptive and personalized instructions to prospective learners in Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring Systems (AITS). They are created parallel to the advancement of adaptive intelligent tutoring frameworks and consequently, connected to the system’s advancement. This paper presents the critical literature review from 2002 to 2017 in the research area of learner characteristics in the development of a learner model for the particular field of AITS. The primary aim of this literature review is to answer the two fundamental questions. First, what are the main characteristics of learners to be modeled second, what is the contributions of learner characteristics in the development of the learner model? The learner characteristics model along with a model application and their comparative study has been discussed in ITS. The goal of this paper is to give the gained information to educationalists, developers, researchers, and scholars for making decisions about what the learner’s characteristics are should be followed while developing an effective learner model.

Keywords

Learner model Learner characteristics Adaptivity E-learning Intelligent tutoring system 

References

  1. 1.
    Kumar, A., Singh, N., Ahuja, N.J.: Learner characteristics based learning style models classification and its implications on teaching. Int. J. Pure Appl. Math. (IJPAM) 118(20), 175–184 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kumar, A., Singh, N., Ahuja, N.J.: Learning styles based adaptive intelligent tutoring systems: Document analysis of articles published between 2001. and 2016. Int. J. Cogn. Res. Sci. Eng. Educ. (IJCRSEE) 5(2), 83–98 (2017)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bull, S., Greer, J., McCalla, G., Kettel, L., Bowes, J.: User modelling in i-help: what, why, when and how. In: International Conference on User Modeling, pp. 117–126. Springer, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44566-8_12 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bull, S.: Supporting learning with open learner models. Planning 29(14), 1 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive hypermedia. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 11(1–2), 87–110 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brusilovsky, P., Millán, E.: User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In: The Adaptive Web, pp. 3–53. Springer, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_1 (2007)
  7. 7.
    Wenger, E.: Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Morgan Kaufman Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1987). ISBN 0-934613-26-5Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brusilovsky, P.: Student model centered architecture for intelligent learning environments. In: Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on User Modeling, Hyannis, MA, pp. 31–36, 15–19 Aug 1994. MITRE (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Self, J., Lawler, R.W., Yazdani, M.: The application of machine learning to student modelling. In: Artificial Intelligence and Education, vol. 1, pp. 267–280. Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00051826 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Self, J.A.: Realism in student modelling. In: Alvey-IKBS Research Workshop Tutoring Systems. University of ExeterGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Self, J. (ed.): Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning: Intelligent Computer-Aided Instruction. Chapman and Hall, London (1988a)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Self, J.A.: Student models: what use are they? In: Ercoli, P., Lewis, R. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence Tools in Education, pp. 73–86. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1988b)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gilmore, D., Self, J.: The application of machine learning to intelligent tutoring systems. In: Artificial Intelligence and Human Learning, Intelligent Computer-Assisted Instruction, pp. 179–196. Chapman and Hall, New York (1988)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, N., Cohen, W.W., Koedinger, K.R., Matsuda, N.: A machine learning approach for automatic student model discovery. In: EDM, pp. 31–40 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    González, C., Burguillo, J. C., Llamas, M.: A qualitative comparison of techniques for student modeling in intelligent tutoring systems. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 36th Annual, pp. 13–18 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jeremić, Z., Jovanović, J., Gasević, D.: Student modeling and assessment in intelligent tutoring of software patterns. Expert. Syst. Appl. 39(1), 210–222 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Graesser, A.C., D’Mello, S.: Moment-To-moment emotions during reading. Read. Teach. 66(3), 238–242 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Essalmi, F., Ayed, L.J.B., Jemni, M., Graf, S.: A fully personalization strategy of e-learning scenarios. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(4), 581–591 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ozyurt, O., Ozyurt, H.: Learning styles based individualized adaptive e-learning environments: content analysis of the articles published from 2005 to 2015. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 349–358 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Truong, H.M.: Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: current developments, problems and opportunities. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 1185–1193 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tseng, J.C.R., Chu, H.C., Hwang, G.J., Tsai, C.C.: Development of an adaptive learning system with two sources of personalization information. Comput. Educ. 51(2), 776–786 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Graf, S., Liu, T.C., Kinshuk. Analysis of learners’ navigational behavior and their learning styles in an online course. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26(2), 116–131 (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Graf, S., Liu, T.C., Kinshuk, Chen, N.S., Yang, S.J.H.: Learning styles and cognitive traits—their relationship and its benefits in web-based educational systems. Comput. Hum. Behav. 25(6), 1280–1289 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Katsionis, G., Virvou, M.: A cognitive theory for affective user modelling in a virtual reality educational game. In: 2004 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 2, pp. 1209–1213. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Balakrishnan, A.: On modeling the affective effect on learning. In: International Workshop on Multi-disciplinary Trends in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 225–235. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dorça, F.A., Lima, L.V., Fernandes, M.A., Lopes, C.R.: Comparing strategies for modeling students learning styles through reinforcement learning in adaptive and intelligent educational systems: An experimental analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(6), 2092–2101 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mitrovic, A., Martin, B.: Evaluating the effects of open student models on learning. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, pp. 296–305 (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Chrysafiadi, K., Virvou, M.: Personalized teaching of a programming language over the web: Stereotypes and rule-based mechanisms. In: JCKBSE (pp. 484–492) (2008, June)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kumar, A.N.: Using Enhanced Concept Map for Student Modeling in Programming Tutors. In FLAIRS Conference, pp. 527–532 (2006a)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kumar, A.: A scalable solution for adaptive problem sequencing and its evaluation. In: International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, pp. 161–171. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006b, June)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Millán, E., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J.L.: A Bayesian diagnostic algorithm for student modeling and its evaluation. User Model. User-Adap. Inter. 12(2–3), 281–330 (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Surjono, H.D., Maltby, J.R.: Adaptive educational hypermedia based on multiple student characteristics. In International Conference on Web-Based Learning, pp. 442–449. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2003, August)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Xu, D., Wang, H., Su, K.: Intelligent student profiling with fuzzy models. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 8–pp IEEE (2002, January)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., Wagner, A.Z.: Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: when students game the system. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 383–390. ACM (2004, April)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baker, R.S., Goldstein, A.B., Heffernan, N.T.: Detecting the moment of learning. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 25–34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010, June)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stathacopoulou, R., Magoulas, G.D., Grigoriadou, M., Samarakou, M.: Neuro-fuzzy knowledge processing in intelligent learning environments for improved student diagnosis. Inf. Sci. 170(2–4), 273–307 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Goel, G., Lallé, S., Luengo, V.: Fuzzy logic representation for student modelling. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 428–433. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012, June)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pramitasari, L., Hidayanto, A.N., Aminah, S., Krisnadhi, A.A., Ramadhanie, A.M.: Development of student model ontology for personalization in an e-learning system based on semantic web. In International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS09), Indonesia, December (pp. 7–8) (2009, December)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wang, X., Yang, Y., Wen, X.: Study on blended learning approach for english teaching. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 4641–4644. IEEE (2009, October) Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baschera, G.M., Gross, M.: Poisson-based inference for perturbation models in adaptive spelling training. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 20(4), 333–360 (2010)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cetintas, S., Si, L., Xin, Y.P.P., Hord, C.: Automatic detection of off-task behaviors in intelligent tutoring systems with machine learning techniques. IEEE T Learn Technol. 3(3), 228–236 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jia, B., Zhong, S., Zheng, T., Liu, Z.: The study and design of adaptive learning system based on fuzzy set theory. In Transactions on edutainment IV, pp. 1–11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Millán, E., Loboda, T., Pérez-De-La-Cruz, J.L.: Bayesian networks for student model engineering. Comput. Educ. 55(4), 1663–1683 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Balakrishnan, A.: On modeling the affective effect on learning. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on multi-disciplinary trends in artificial intelligence, pp. 225–235. Hyderabad, India (2011)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Al-Hmouz, A., Shen, J., Yan, J., Al-Hmouz, R.: Enhanced learner model for adaptive mobile learning. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on information integration and web-based applications & services, pp. 783–786. ACM. (2010, November)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ayala, A.P., Sossa, H.: Semantic representation and management of student models: an approach to adapt lecture sequencing to enhance learning. In Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 175–186. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010, November)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Salim, N., Haron, N.: The construction of fuzzy set and fuzzy rule for mixed approach in adaptive hypermedia learning system. In International Conference on Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment, pp. 183–187. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006, April) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Baker, R.S.: Modeling and understanding students' off-task behavior in intelligent tutoring systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 1059–1068. ACM (2007, April)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Carmona, C., Conejo, R.: A learner model in a distributed environment. In International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, pp. 353–359. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2004, August) Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kofod-Petersen, A., Abbas, S., Gunhild, P., Bye, G., Kolås, L., Staupe, A.: Learning in an ambient intelligent environment towards modelling learners through stereotypes (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Conati, C., Maclaren, H.: Empirically building and evaluating a probabilistic model of user affect. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 19(3), 267–303 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Conati, C., Zhou, X.: Modeling students’ emotions from cognitive appraisal in educational games. In International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pp. 944–954. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2002, June)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Alepis, E., Virvou, M.: Automatic generation of emotions in tutoring agents for affective e-learning in medical education. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 9840–9847 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kassim, A.A., Kazi, S.A., Ranganath, S. U. R. E. N. D. R. A.: A web-based intelligent learning environment for digital systems. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 20(1), 13–23 (2004).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Le, N.T., Menzel, W.: Using weighted constraints to diagnose errors in logic programming–the case of an Ill-defined domain. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 19(4), 381–400 (2009)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Martin, B.: Constraint-based student modeling: representing student knowledge. In New Zealand Computer Science Research Students’ Conference, pp. 22–29 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Petroleum and Energy StudiesDehradunIndia
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringDIT UniversityDehradunIndia

Personalised recommendations